The Tenth Circuit ruled 2-1 against Custodia Bank, upholding the Federal Reserve's authority to deny master account applications from crypto-focused state-chartered banks. The post Fed Wins Legal Battle Over Custodia Bank Master Account Denial appeared first on Coinspeaker.The Tenth Circuit ruled 2-1 against Custodia Bank, upholding the Federal Reserve's authority to deny master account applications from crypto-focused state-chartered banks. The post Fed Wins Legal Battle Over Custodia Bank Master Account Denial appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Fed Wins Legal Battle Over Custodia Bank Master Account Denial

2025/11/01 03:32

The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled against Custodia Bank on Oct. 31, affirming the Federal Reserve’s authority to deny the crypto-focused bank’s application for a master account. The 2-1 decision upheld a lower court judgment in favor of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

The court held that Federal Reserve Banks have discretion to reject master account applications from statutorily eligible institutions. Judge Ebel’s majority opinion rejected Custodia’s argument that Section 248a(c)(2) of the Monetary Control Act, which states services “shall be available,” creates a mandatory duty to grant accounts, according to the court opinion. The majority found that Section 342 of the Federal Reserve Act, which states a Reserve Bank “may receive” deposits, grants discretionary authority.

Master accounts provide banks with direct access to the Federal Reserve’s payment systems and allow institutions to hold reserves at the Fed.

Custodia had argued the Monetary Control Act’s language requiring that Federal Reserve services “shall be available” created a non-discretionary obligation. The bank contended that as a Wyoming-chartered Special Purpose Depository Institution eligible under federal law, it was entitled to an account.

Court’s Reasoning and Dissent

The majority opinion stated that reading a major access mandate into the Monetary Control Act’s pricing principles would be “finding an elephant in a mousehole.” The court also cited the 2022 Toomey Amendment, which requires reporting on rejected applications from eligible entities, as evidence that Congress understood rejections could occur.

Judge Tymkovich wrote a dissent arguing the Monetary Control Act’s “shall be available” language is a clear command. The dissent raised concerns under the Appointments Clause, warning the majority’s ruling grants “significant yet unreviewable executive authority” to unappointed officials.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City denied Custodia’s application in January 2023, citing heightened risks from its “novel” and “crypto-asset focused” business model.

Custodia CEO Caitlin Long, a Wall Street veteran, founded the bank to serve digital asset companies using a Wyoming SPDI charter.

Unlike federally chartered banks, which automatically receive master accounts, state-chartered institutions like Custodia must apply separately for Fed access. The bank had applied for the account in October 2020 and initially sued the Fed in 2022 over alleged delays exceeding 19 months.

next

The post Fed Wins Legal Battle Over Custodia Bank Master Account Denial appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

XRP Liquidation Imbalance: Analyst Explains What It Means

XRP Liquidation Imbalance: Analyst Explains What It Means

The post XRP Liquidation Imbalance: Analyst Explains What It Means appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple (XRP) experienced sharp volatility in the cryptocurrency market over the last 24 hours. According to CoinGlass data, a total of $7.93 million worth of XRP positions were liquidated. $7.21 million of this came from long positions and $718,000 from short positions. This brought the daily liquidation imbalance to a record 903%. The XRP price fell from $3.04 to $2.98 during the day, falling below the critical $3 psychological support level. While the $2.90 level is currently being held as support, the market is showing no signs of a strong recovery. The sharp decline was not limited to XRP alone. On the Ethereum (ETH) side, a total of $61.5 million worth of long positions were liquidated, while short losses were limited to $4.14 million. A similar picture was seen for Bitcoin (BTC): $35.1 million was liquidated, $33.1 million of which came from long positions. The higher liquidation rate for long positions compared to short positions may indicate a weakening of buyer appetite in the market. Some analysts suggest that the decline may be due to strategic price pressure from institutional investors rather than a simple correction. Black Swan Capitalist founder Versan Aljarrah and financial writer Jim Willie argue that institutions are holding back the rally to accumulate XRP at its low price. “If it weren’t for these pressures, XRP could have risen to at least $7-$8 from its recent price movements,” Willie said, adding that institutions see XRP as a liquidity tool instead of the US dollar and take long-term positions. *This is not investment advice. Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data! Source: https://en.bitcoinsistemi.com/xrp-liquidation-imbalance-analyst-explains-what-it-means/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/21 05:37