TLDRs; Appeals court rules against Apple, questioning legality of its 27% off-store App Store commission. Epic Games gains key victory as Apple faces scrutiny overTLDRs; Appeals court rules against Apple, questioning legality of its 27% off-store App Store commission. Epic Games gains key victory as Apple faces scrutiny over

Apple Loses Appeal in Epic App Store Battle, Court Challenges 27% Off-Store Commission

2025/12/12 19:19

TLDRs;

  • Appeals court rules against Apple, questioning legality of its 27% off-store App Store commission.
  • Epic Games gains key victory as Apple faces scrutiny over external payment restrictions.
  • Apple may have to revise App Store fees, impacting developers and revenue streams.
  • Court instructs trial judge to reconsider Apple’s commission structure following previous injunction violations.

Apple has suffered a significant legal setback as a U.S. federal appeals court ruled against the tech giant in its long-running dispute with Epic Games over App Store policies. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found that Apple violated a prior court injunction by enforcing a 27% commission on transactions conducted outside the App Store.

The ruling upholds a lower court’s contempt finding against Apple and directs the trial judge to reassess the commission rates Apple can legally charge developers using its intellectual property. The decision marks a pivotal moment in a dispute that has persisted for over five years, reflecting ongoing tensions over app marketplace control and developer freedom.

Epic Games Challenges Apple’s Monopoly

Epic Games has long argued that Apple’s App Store practices restrict competition by limiting how developers can direct users to alternative payment methods. Apple’s commission structure, typically ranging from 15% to 30% for most in-app purchases, has been criticized for stifling innovation and maintaining a monopolistic hold over iOS app transactions.

The court’s decision strengthens Epic’s position and raises questions about the potential for reduced App Store fees or increased flexibility for developers. Legal experts suggest that the ruling may encourage more companies to push for alternative payment solutions, potentially reshaping how digital purchases are processed on Apple devices.

Regulatory Pressure and Global Precedents

While the appeals court’s decision casts doubt on Apple’s off-store commission, past regulatory actions indicate that any immediate changes may be moderate. In South Korea, Apple imposes a 26% commission on third-party payments, while Dutch dating apps face a 27% rate, both under regulatory oversight.

Meanwhile, Google’s “user choice billing” program allows Android developers to reduce fees by around 4 percentage points, though conversion friction often offsets these savings. In the European Union, Apple’s Digital Markets Act-compliant rates range from 10% to 17%, plus a €0.50 Core Technology Fee per first annual install exceeding one million downloads.

Experts argue that even with legal adjustments, Apple is likely to maintain revenue-protecting mechanisms such as distinct app binaries, audits, and complex fee structures.

Potential Impact on Payments and Subscriptions

A reduction in Apple’s commission could shift significant spending from in-app purchases to external payment methods, benefiting payment processors and subscription platforms. Consumer spending on non-game apps across iOS and Google Play reached $19.2 billion in Q4 2024, with productivity apps up 46% and finance apps nearing 7.5 billion downloads.

TikTok alone generated approximately $1.9 billion in in-app revenue during the same period. If off-store fees decrease meaningfully, developers may redirect users to web-based checkouts, boosting revenue opportunities for platforms that facilitate app-to-web transactions. The streaming and social media sectors, which collectively amassed over $23 billion in spending in 2024, could also see growing use of alternative payment solutions.

The ruling underscores the continuing tension between major tech platforms and regulators, as courts, lawmakers, and developers increasingly push for a more competitive digital marketplace. While Apple may appeal or adjust its policies strategically, the decision signals that App Store practices will remain under intense scrutiny in the years ahead.

The post Apple Loses Appeal in Epic App Store Battle, Court Challenges 27% Off-Store Commission appeared first on CoinCentral.

Piyasa Fırsatı
Epic Chain Logosu
Epic Chain Fiyatı(EPIC)
$0.5258
$0.5258$0.5258
+12.66%
USD
Epic Chain (EPIC) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41