PANews reported on November 7th that, according to Lookonchain, three new addresses withdrew 4,920 ETH (approximately $16.25 million) from Tornado.Cash and sold it at a price of approximately $3,302. Lookonchain stated that Richard Heart (founder of HEX, PulseChain, and PulseX) purchased 162,937 ETH (approximately $619 million) this year at approximately $3,800 and deposited it all into Tornado.Cash two days ago; it is currently unclear whether the aforementioned sell-off is related to him or was the work of a hacker.PANews reported on November 7th that, according to Lookonchain, three new addresses withdrew 4,920 ETH (approximately $16.25 million) from Tornado.Cash and sold it at a price of approximately $3,302. Lookonchain stated that Richard Heart (founder of HEX, PulseChain, and PulseX) purchased 162,937 ETH (approximately $619 million) this year at approximately $3,800 and deposited it all into Tornado.Cash two days ago; it is currently unclear whether the aforementioned sell-off is related to him or was the work of a hacker.

Three new wallets, suspected to be linked to Richard Heart, withdrew 4,920 ETH from Tornado.Cash and sold them.

2025/11/07 11:48

PANews reported on November 7th that, according to Lookonchain, three new addresses withdrew 4,920 ETH (approximately $16.25 million) from Tornado.Cash and sold it at a price of approximately $3,302. Lookonchain stated that Richard Heart (founder of HEX, PulseChain, and PulseX) purchased 162,937 ETH (approximately $619 million) this year at approximately $3,800 and deposited it all into Tornado.Cash two days ago; it is currently unclear whether the aforementioned sell-off is related to him or was the work of a hacker.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Starknet bids to make bitcoin productive with new BTCfi push

Starknet bids to make bitcoin productive with new BTCfi push

The post Starknet bids to make bitcoin productive with new BTCfi push appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Starknet is stepping up efforts to attract bitcoin onto its layer-2 network. It’s rolling out a 100 million STRK incentive program alongside new staking mechanics in hopes to position the rollup as bitcoin’s “execution layer.” The campaign, branded BTCFi on Starknet, comes as rival projects Babylon and Botanix pitch their own competing models for putting idle BTC to work. Babylon channels bitcoin into securing external proof-of-stake chains, while Botanix earlier this month launched stBTC, a vault that redistributes half of its gas fees — paid in bitcoin — directly to users. Starknet’s pitch is different, according to Tom Brand, StarkWare’s head of product. Bitcoin stakers will help secure the rollup itself. Read more: Botanix launches stBTC to deliver Bitcoin-native yield “Babylon focuses on staking BTC to secure external [proof-of-stake] chains, and Botanix builds an EVM chain on Bitcoin,” Brand told Blockworks. “Starknet, by contrast, lets BTC directly secure a real, high-throughput zk rollup with active DeFi and BTCFi use, so staked Bitcoin underpins real economic activity, not just theoretical security.” For now, however, Starknet staking relies on wrapped assets such as tBTC, LBTC, WBTC and SolvBTC rather than native bitcoin. That means users gain exposure via smart contracts on Starknet, but custody ultimately depends on the safety of wrapper infrastructure and cross-chain bridges. “Staking is ‘trustless’ in the sense that users retain control via smart contracts on Starknet and do not hand BTC to a centralized custodian,” Brand said, acknowledging the “BTC is wrapped and bridged, introducing trust assumptions tied to the wrapper infrastructure and the bridge itself.” There are other caveats. Unlike proof-of-stake systems where validators risk losing funds if they misbehave, Starknet’s BTC staking has no slashing mechanism today. “The architecture allows for slashing to be added in the future, but none is active now,” Brand said. That…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/30 13:49