The post Stream’s xUSD Faces Scrutiny Over High Leverage and Transparency appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Concerns over Stream’s xUSD leverage and asset backing transparency. xUSD’s 4.1x leverage fuels market concern. Stream’s founder addresses issues, promises transparency. Stream’s xUSD token faces scrutiny after KOL CBB0FE warns of risky leverage levels and asset backing discrepancies, prompting a response from the founder about transparency and collateralization improvements. The event highlights potential systemic risks within DeFi, emphasizing the importance of transparency and proper asset management amid volatile market conditions and heightened community skepticism. xUSD’s 4.1x Leverage Spurs Market Scrutiny CBB0FE’s warning spotlighted Stream’s xUSD, which has approximately $170 million in on-chain assets backing, while borrowing around $530 million. This discrepancy led to criticism about its illiquidity and leverage position, emphasizing risks involved with Morpho/Euler vaults. As CBB0FE, a Key Opinion Leader, stated, “Stream’s xUSD has only about $170 million in on-chain asset backing, yet it has borrowed about $530 million from various lending protocols. This means its leverage is as high as 4.1 times—built on a large number of extremely illiquid positions. This is not ‘yield farming,’ but outright degenerate gambling leverage speculation. Stay away from it. Do not touch anything related to the Morpho/Euler vaults.” Efforts to improve transparency by Stream’s founder include integrating third-party attestors and clarifying that xUSD is not a stablecoin. The reclassification as a tokenized market neutral fund aims to alleviate concerns. However, further developments are expected as the founder pledged to enhance transparency and address miscommunication. Market reactions to the controversy have been mixed, with some seeing it as a call for caution. CBB0FE’s public warning was widely shared, while Stream’s response focused on correcting miscommunication and stressing their insurance fund. Regulation and Analysis: xUSD’s Future Challenges Did you know? Excessive leverage reminiscent of previous collapses, such as the October 2025 (record USD 19 billion in liquidated positions) scenario, underscores the… The post Stream’s xUSD Faces Scrutiny Over High Leverage and Transparency appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Concerns over Stream’s xUSD leverage and asset backing transparency. xUSD’s 4.1x leverage fuels market concern. Stream’s founder addresses issues, promises transparency. Stream’s xUSD token faces scrutiny after KOL CBB0FE warns of risky leverage levels and asset backing discrepancies, prompting a response from the founder about transparency and collateralization improvements. The event highlights potential systemic risks within DeFi, emphasizing the importance of transparency and proper asset management amid volatile market conditions and heightened community skepticism. xUSD’s 4.1x Leverage Spurs Market Scrutiny CBB0FE’s warning spotlighted Stream’s xUSD, which has approximately $170 million in on-chain assets backing, while borrowing around $530 million. This discrepancy led to criticism about its illiquidity and leverage position, emphasizing risks involved with Morpho/Euler vaults. As CBB0FE, a Key Opinion Leader, stated, “Stream’s xUSD has only about $170 million in on-chain asset backing, yet it has borrowed about $530 million from various lending protocols. This means its leverage is as high as 4.1 times—built on a large number of extremely illiquid positions. This is not ‘yield farming,’ but outright degenerate gambling leverage speculation. Stay away from it. Do not touch anything related to the Morpho/Euler vaults.” Efforts to improve transparency by Stream’s founder include integrating third-party attestors and clarifying that xUSD is not a stablecoin. The reclassification as a tokenized market neutral fund aims to alleviate concerns. However, further developments are expected as the founder pledged to enhance transparency and address miscommunication. Market reactions to the controversy have been mixed, with some seeing it as a call for caution. CBB0FE’s public warning was widely shared, while Stream’s response focused on correcting miscommunication and stressing their insurance fund. Regulation and Analysis: xUSD’s Future Challenges Did you know? Excessive leverage reminiscent of previous collapses, such as the October 2025 (record USD 19 billion in liquidated positions) scenario, underscores the…

Stream’s xUSD Faces Scrutiny Over High Leverage and Transparency

2025/10/29 14:38
Key Points:
  • Concerns over Stream’s xUSD leverage and asset backing transparency.
  • xUSD’s 4.1x leverage fuels market concern.
  • Stream’s founder addresses issues, promises transparency.

Stream’s xUSD token faces scrutiny after KOL CBB0FE warns of risky leverage levels and asset backing discrepancies, prompting a response from the founder about transparency and collateralization improvements.

The event highlights potential systemic risks within DeFi, emphasizing the importance of transparency and proper asset management amid volatile market conditions and heightened community skepticism.

xUSD’s 4.1x Leverage Spurs Market Scrutiny

CBB0FE’s warning spotlighted Stream’s xUSD, which has approximately $170 million in on-chain assets backing, while borrowing around $530 million. This discrepancy led to criticism about its illiquidity and leverage position, emphasizing risks involved with Morpho/Euler vaults. As CBB0FE, a Key Opinion Leader, stated, “Stream’s xUSD has only about $170 million in on-chain asset backing, yet it has borrowed about $530 million from various lending protocols. This means its leverage is as high as 4.1 times—built on a large number of extremely illiquid positions. This is not ‘yield farming,’ but outright degenerate gambling leverage speculation. Stay away from it. Do not touch anything related to the Morpho/Euler vaults.”

Efforts to improve transparency by Stream’s founder include integrating third-party attestors and clarifying that xUSD is not a stablecoin. The reclassification as a tokenized market neutral fund aims to alleviate concerns. However, further developments are expected as the founder pledged to enhance transparency and address miscommunication.

Market reactions to the controversy have been mixed, with some seeing it as a call for caution. CBB0FE’s public warning was widely shared, while Stream’s response focused on correcting miscommunication and stressing their insurance fund.

Regulation and Analysis: xUSD’s Future Challenges

Did you know? Excessive leverage reminiscent of previous collapses, such as the October 2025 (record USD 19 billion in liquidated positions) scenario, underscores the potential tail risks of DeFi protocols.

Ethereum (ETH), as a core platform for DeFi lending, is currently valued at $4,028.46 with a market cap of $486.23 billion. Daily volume has reached $37.61 billion, and while last 24-hour prices slipped by 1.38%, a 4.28% gain is noted over a week. Further statistics and details are provided by CoinMarketCap.

Ethereum(ETH), daily chart, screenshot on CoinMarketCap at 06:30 UTC on October 29, 2025. Source: CoinMarketCap

Insights from Coincu Research suggest possible regulatory evaluations given the complexities of xUSD’s leverage, enhancing oversight could emerge for similar DeFi products as risk management becomes a priority.

Source: https://coincu.com/news/xusd-leverage-transparency-concerns/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

“Circle Just Solved the $29 Trillion Crypto Adoption Problem

“Circle Just Solved the $29 Trillion Crypto Adoption Problem

Circle’s new project, ARC Testnet, has caught the financial world’s attention for one reason: the list of participants is staggering. BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, Visa, Mastercard, and Deutsche Bank are all tied in. But the real breakthrough lies in a simple innovation, USD-denominated gas fees. By allowing blockchain transactions to be paid directly in dollars rather than volatile crypto, Circle may have just eliminated the final obstacle keeping $29 trillion in global pension funds out of the digital asset markets. For years, institutional investors have hesitated to enter crypto not because of lack of infrastructure, but because of operational risk tied to crypto-denominated fees and fluctuating assets. Circle’s ARC testnet bypasses that entirely, creating a compliance-friendly environment where gas can be paid in stablecoins. This seemingly small detail creates massive implications. Suddenly, large funds can settle, custody, and transact entirely within a digital framework that still operates in fiat terms. That’s an open invitation for financial institutions that already manage tens of trillions in traditional markets. While ARC mainnet is not expected until 2026, insiders say budget allocations for pilot programs are already happening now. Financial institutions are treating ARC preparedness as a 2025 line item. The timing could not be more strategic given that Circle’s anticipated IPO will require a strong growth narrative. By positioning ARC as the missing layer between traditional money and blockchain efficiency, Circle is painting itself as the company that can finally merge the financial system’s past and future. If the rollout continues smoothly, the stablecoin issuer could pivot from utility provider to infrastructure backbone for institutional crypto adoption. Circle’s pitch isn’t about speculation anymore, it’s about owning the rails of the next global financial upgrade. “Circle Just Solved the $29 Trillion Crypto Adoption Problem was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/10/30 14:46
Speculation as Culture

Speculation as Culture

We used to build things because we believed in them. Now, we build because someone might buy them. Speculation isn’t just a financial behavior anymore — it’s a cultural operating system. From crypto tokens to content virality to design trends, we live in a world where potential value has replaced real value. Everything is a pre-launch, a teaser, a drop. Even ideas are traded like assets, inflated with hype before they ever mature. Web3 was supposed to decentralize ownership, but what it really decentralized was attention. We all became investors in narratives. Every creator is now a startup; every tweet is an IPO. The new capitalism isn’t about production — it’s about participation in momentum. The problem? Momentum doesn’t create meaning. Design has absorbed this sickness too. Products are released half-finished, optimized for FOMO instead of function. Brands trade authenticity for aesthetics that look “investable.” And creatives — once obsessed with craft — are now caught in loops of engagement farming. It’s not “What did you make?” anymore. It’s “How many noticed before it was over?” Speculation rewards velocity, not vision. It turns creativity into a casino, where we keep betting on our own relevance. Even the language of art has shifted — “drops,” “floor price,” “community alpha.” We stopped talking about what something means and started asking what it’s worth. This economy of anticipation keeps us in a constant state of almost. We’re always on the verge of the next thing — but nothing lands, nothing lingers. Attention, like capital, has become liquidity. To create meaning again, design has to resist this speculative loop. It has to slow down, to reclaim patience as a form of rebellion. The future shouldn’t just be bought early — it should be built deliberately. Because right now, speculation is our culture’s addiction. And the house always wins. Speculation as Culture was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/10/30 14:46