U.S. stocks moved unevenly after the Fed's rate cut, with Dow rising but S&P 500 and Nasdaq slipping.U.S. stocks moved unevenly after the Fed's rate cut, with Dow rising but S&P 500 and Nasdaq slipping.

Stocks, dollar, gold, dil, and Bitcoin show diverging moves post-Fed rate cut

2025/09/18 16:47

Markets didn’t sit still after the Federal Reserve slashed its benchmark rate by a quarter percentage point on Wednesday after 10 long months.

What came after was a messy, high-stakes dance across the world’s asset classes, as stocks, commodities, and currencies all moved, but not in one direction.

Traders and investors are trying to make sense of a complicated new environment. Risk is back on the table, but not everything is rallying the same way.

U.S. equity futures were slightly green, but the mood was anything but euphoric. S&P 500 futures ticked up just 0.2%, same as the Nasdaq 100, while Dow Jones futures added a mild 0.1%, that’s 50 points, nothing to write home about.

This lukewarm reaction came after a jittery Wednesday session where the Dow Jones managed a 260-point gain, or 0.57%, while both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite actually dropped, as Cryptopolitan reported.

Gold loses steam while the dollar flexes and bonds plunges

If [like us] you thought the rate cut would lift gold, think again. Prices for the yellow metal actually slipped as the dollar got stronger, because, of course, that’s what always happens when traders sniff less dovishness from the Fed than they wanted.

Spot gold fell 0.6%, now sitting at $3,637.41 per ounce after briefly touching a record high of $3,707.40 the day before. U.S. gold futures for December sank by 1.2% to $3,671.30.

Silver fell by 0.6% to $41.40 per ounce, and platinum ticked up slightly by 0.5% to $1,371.6, but palladium inched down 0.2%, now at $1,152.24, according to data from Bloomberg. Even SPDR Gold Trust, the heavyweight among gold ETFs, saw its holdings drop by 0.44%, from 979.95 tonnes to 975.66 in one day.

Bloomberg’s dollar index gained 0.4%, the biggest one-day move in two weeks. Traders pulled back on aggressive rate-cut forecasts, and currencies like the New Zealand dollar and the South Korean won took the hit.

Meanwhile, the 10-year Treasury yield dipped by over 3 basis points to 4.045 and the 2-year Treasury yield plunged by over 2 basis points to 3.524%. The 30-year Treasury bond yield is also 3 basis points lower at 4.643%.

Asia-Pacific trades split as energy shock rocks Australia

Markets in Asia didn’t move in sync either. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged 1.15% and closed at a fresh all-time high of 45,303.43. Gains came mostly from real estate and tech names.

Top performers included Resonac Holdings, which popped over 11%, Sumco Corp, which climbed 7.39%, and Mitsui Mining & Smelting, up more than 5%. South Korea’s Kospi wasn’t far behind, rising 1.40% to end at 3,461.3.

But not everyone had a good day. Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 slumped 0.83%, closing at 8,745.2. The standout loser? Santos, the major Aussie gas producer, whose shares plunged over 11% last week after ADNOC, the oil giant from Abu Dhabi, walked away from an $18.7 billion acquisition.

That acquisition deal had dragged on for months due to pricing and legal headaches, and ADNOC finally tapped out. So Santos is now licking its wounds with its stock down to A$6.78.

Back to Asia, China didn’t exactly glow either. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index lost 1.31%, and the mainland CSI 300 dropped 1.16% to land at 4,498.11.

Europe, on the other hand, woke up feeling hopeful. Stoxx 600 was up 0.5% in early London trade, and for once, nearly all regional indexes joined the ride.

The Euro Stoxx Banks Index jumped 0.9% in early trade, while the region’s biggest banks Deutsche Bank, Santander, and Monte dei Paschi all surged by about 2% respectively, which we think means that financials could benefit from the transatlantic macro picture.

And finally, no global cross-asset report would be complete without Bitcoin. The crypto king was caught in the middle; neither rallying hard nor breaking down. That alone is telling.

In an environment where stocks are twitchy, gold is fading, and the dollar is punching up, Bitcoin’s sideways grind says more than a breakout would. At press time, the OG crypto was worth $117,782.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Bitcoin Holds Price Range Despite Drop to $108K as Whale Rotation Keep Traders Cautious

Bitcoin Holds Price Range Despite Drop to $108K as Whale Rotation Keep Traders Cautious

Your daily access to the backroom
Share
Blockhead2025/11/03 15:03
Series A funding, Series B retirement: A crash course in wealth for crypto founders

Series A funding, Series B retirement: A crash course in wealth for crypto founders

Source: Fortune Original title: Crypto founders are getting very rich, very fast—again Compiled and edited by: BitpushNews In the startup world, we are used to stories where founders work hard for years and eventually become millionaires when their companies go public or are acquired. Such wealth stories are also playing out in the cryptocurrency field, only this path to riches is often much shorter. A prime example is Bam Azizi. He founded the crypto payments company Mesh in 2020, and this year completed an $82 million Series B funding round. Normally, this kind of financing should all be invested in the company's development, but this time at least $20 million went directly into Azizi's personal pocket. This money comes from "secondary sales"—investors buying shares from founders or other early participants. This means that while the funding amount looks impressive, the actual amount reaching the company's account may be significantly less. However, for founders, they don't need to wait years; they can achieve financial freedom in the blink of an eye. This isn't necessarily a bad thing. A Mesh spokesperson pointed out that the company's partnership with PayPal and the launch of its AI wallet are progressing well. However, the problem is that in the current bull market, founders are cashing out early through secondary sales, making a fortune before the company has truly proven its value. Luxury mansion worth tens of millions Azizi is not an isolated case. In this bull market that began last year, Bitcoin has soared from $45,000 to $125,000, creating countless wealth myths. In mid-2024, the crypto social platform Farcaster completed a $150 million Series A funding round, with at least $15 million used to acquire shares held by founder Dan Romero. This former Coinbase employee has never hidden his wealth. In an interview with Architectural Digest, he showed in detail his $7.3 million mansion on Venice Beach, a four-building estate that the magazine called an "Italian-style garden." Although the renovation was a success, Farcaster's development has not been smooth sailing. According to reports, the platform currently has fewer than 5,000 daily active users, far behind competitors such as Zora. Romero has not responded to this. Omer Goldberg also benefited. Of the $55 million Series A funding round his security company Chaos Labs raised this year, $15 million went to him personally. This company, backed by PayPal Ventures, has become a significant voice in the blockchain security field, but has also remained silent about the deal. Why are venture capitalists willing to pay? According to industry insiders, secondary sales are becoming increasingly common in the current hot cryptocurrency market and popular sectors such as AI. Top venture capital firms like Paradigm and Andreessen Horowitz often agree to acquire shares from founders to secure lead funding for high-quality projects. For investors, this is essentially a gamble. The common equity they acquire offers limited returns, far less than preferred stock in conventional financing. But in an industry accustomed to making grand promises, whether it's appropriate to be so generous in rewarding founders who haven't yet succeeded is certainly debatable. Veteran cryptocurrency observers will be familiar with this scenario. During the ICO craze of 2016, countless projects easily raised hundreds of millions of dollars by issuing tokens. They promised to revolutionize blockchain technology and surpass Ethereum, but most have since disappeared. At the time, investors tried to use "governance tokens" to constrain the founders, but one venture capitalist admitted, "They're called governance tokens, but they don't actually govern anything." By the time the new bull market arrived in 2021, financing models began to resemble the traditional Silicon Valley model, but the phenomenon of founders cashing out in advance still existed. In a $555 million funding round, executives at payment company MoonPay cashed out $150 million. The market was beginning to cool down when the media reported that the CEO had spent $40 million to buy a luxury mansion in Miami. OpenSea, a once-star project, followed a similar path, with its founding team cashing out a significant portion of their funding. However, as the NFT craze faded, the company is now forced to seek a transformation. You are building a faith community. Why don't venture capitalists stick to a more traditional incentive model—allowing founders to meet their basic financial needs in Series B or C rounds, but only allowing them to receive huge returns once the company truly succeeds? Veteran trading lawyer Derek Colla pointed out the key: most cryptocurrency companies are "asset-light" and do not require the huge capital investment that is required in the chip industry, so this capital naturally flows to the founders. He further explained, "This industry is extremely reliant on influence marketing; there are far too many people willing to throw money at founders. Essentially, you're building a belief community." Secondary market expert Glen Anderson put it more bluntly: "In hype cycles like AI and cryptocurrency, you can easily cash out as long as you tell a good story." However, he emphasized that founders cashing out does not mean they have lost faith in the project. Colla, the lawyer, believes that massive cash-outs do not diminish a founder's enthusiasm. He cites MoonPay as an example: although the founder faced criticism over the mansion incident, the company's business continued to thrive. Farcaster's failure was not due to the founder's lack of effort; "he worked harder than most people." However, he also acknowledged that truly great entrepreneurs choose to hold shares for the long term because they believe these shares will multiply in value when the company goes public. "Great founders never want to sell on the secondary market," Colla concluded. In this industry brimming with both opportunities and bubbles, wealth comes and goes quickly. As a new wave of wealth creation sweeps in, perhaps we should consider: what kind of incentives can truly nurture great companies?
Share
PANews2025/11/03 15:00