Written by Reid A. Winthrop, Managing Partner, Winthrop Law Group, PC
Digital assets have moved from the fringes of speculation into the mainstream of finance. According to CoinDesk, stablecoins alone now account for more than $288 billion in circulation, with nearly 99% pegged to the US dollar. Tokenised bonds, real estate and even art are being traded daily across distributed ledgers and these real world assets that have been tokenised are projected to be worth $24 billion by the end of 2025 and up to $30 trillion by 2034. Yet beneath the promise of borderless liquidity and programmable money lies a vulnerability often overlooked until it is too late. What happens to digital wealth when its owner dies?
5% of Ethereum tokens and 20% of Bitcoins potentially lost forever
Source: X/Coinbureau
The central problem is one of irretrievability. In traditional finance, executors can locate bank accounts, contact custodians and obtain court orders to access frozen funds. On the blockchain, there is no such recourse — lose the private keys, and the assets are gone forever. Chainalysis estimates that as much as 3.7million Bitcoins worth approximately 20% of all Bitcoin has been lost and 5% of Ethereum tokens are lost due to inaccessible wallets, some forever locked behind forgotten seed phrases. The BBC reported the case of James Howells, who inadvertently threw away a hard drive containing 8,000 BTC, now worth close to a billion and the local council will not allow him to go search for his computer in the refuse tip where he believes the Bitcoins are stored. Unlike a misplaced stock certificate, blockchain-powered digital assets can vanish without a trace once authentication fails. Lawmakers are only beginning to grapple with this new frontier of inheritance. In the United States, adoption of the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (RUFADAA) has given executors conditional rights to access accounts, provided explicit
authorisation exists in wills or trusts. The Uniform Law Commission notes, however, that implementation varies widely across states, leaving estates vulnerable to patchwork enforcement. In the United Kingdom, the proposed Property (Digital Assets) Bill aims to classify crypto holdings as property, making them formally inheritable. Yet even here, the General Data Protection Regulation in Europe complicates matters, sometimes preventing executors from accessing personal digital data without explicit pre-death consent. In emerging markets, where tokenisation is accelerating fastest, probate systems often do not recognise digital assets at all, leaving heirs with no enforceable claim.
The legal uncertainty is compounded by technical barriers. Many exchanges and platforms employ strict two-factor authentication systems that are tied to personal devices. If a phone is lost or a SIM card deactivated, heirs can find themselves permanently locked out. Terms of service often bar third-party access, even for executors with court approval. Big technology firms have tried to provide workarounds: Apple has introduced its “Legacy Contact” program, allowing users to designate successors to iCloud data and Google offers an “Inactive Account Manager” that transfers access after prolonged inactivity. Yet these remain fragmented solutions in a world where most blockchain-native platforms lack similar mechanisms. At the heart of the issue lies a deeper philosophical tension between self-custody and traditional custody services. Advocates of self-sovereignty argue that control of private keys embodies the very ethos of blockchain — financial independence from institutions. Yet this autonomy creates a profound estate planning risk if owners fail to pass on keys securely. According to Fidelity, fewer than 15% of holders of digital assets in 2024 had included these assets in their estate plans. By contrast, custodial models, where banks, platforms or exchanges manage client assets, allow smoother inheritance procedures but often blur the line between ownership and custodianship. When FTX and Celsius collapsed, users discovered that “their” crypto was legally part of the bankruptcy estate, leaving heirs with nothing more than creditor claims, as Reuters has detailed.
Solutions are emerging, but none are yet universal. Some estate planners recommend maintaining a secure digital asset inventory, i.e. an encrypted record of wallets, platforms and authentication instructions kept offline or in a safety deposit box. Blockchain developers are experimenting with inheritance modules in smart contracts where ownership can automatically shift to heirs upon verification of a death certificate through trusted oracles. Multi-signature wallets, where heirs, executors and the original owner each hold a share of the signing authority, provide another safeguard, although they require technical literacy and trust. The notion of a “digital executor” is
also gaining ground: a professional specifically tasked with navigating the technical and legal dimensions of digital estate transfer. But without global standards, such roles remain vulnerable to conflict across jurisdictions. Beyond the legal and technical hurdles lies a human reality — inheriting wealth is already a time of emotional complexity and therefore adding layers of cryptographic processes can deepen the burden. For heirs unfamiliar with digital finance, a stablecoin wallet or tokenised property dashboard may feel alien, even intimidating; the risk is that assets are sold prematurely, transferred incorrectly, or abandoned entirely. Clear communication in life, explaining what digital assets exist, how they fit into an investment strategy and why they were chosen may be as important as estate planning when it comes to digital assets. In the end, inheritance is not just about transmitting value, but about transmitting meaning. The next decade is likely to bring significant convergence between law, technology and financial practice. Regulators are beginning to recognise that tokenisation is not a niche but a structural shift. The European Union’s plan for a
unified digital identity wallet could eventually integrate inheritance rights across borders. Platforms issuing tokenised assets may embed succession planning into their protocols, allowing owners to set heirs, contingent beneficiaries, and even conditional allocations directly into smart contracts. This could reduce disputes and ensure that assets remain productive rather than frozen in limbo.
Yet technology cannot erase the paradox at the heart of the issue. The same features that make blockchain valuable (immutability, decentralisation and autonomy) make it resistant to human contingencies such as death. Will we see digital assets that have not been claimed or moved for 15 years being subject to the UK’s Dormant Assets Scheme, which, already, according the UK government, “has unlocked more than £745m for social and environmental initiatives, from over £1.35bn in dormant bank and building society accounts”? Legal harmonisation may narrow gaps, custodial platforms may offer bridges and smart contracts may automate transfers, but the irreducible challenge remains. How to align a self-sovereign system with the collective needs of society? How can we protect a decentralised product from being lost forever? And, is there an insurance product that can be developed to bring confidence to these assets?
Digital inheritance is thus more than a private planning concern — it is a stress test for the entire digital economy. If billions in tokenised wealth disappear each year into inaccessible wallets, confidence in blockchain as an infrastructure for intergenerational wealth will erode. Conversely, if frameworks for secure transfer mature, blockchain technology could underpin not just the circulation of value in life, but the preservation of legacies across generations. Which raises the central question: can digital finance evolve fast enough to ensure that the wealth we create in code survives us in the world of flesh and blood?
Reid Winthrop is an attorney at Winthrop Law Group, PC in Newport Beach, California, where he advises clients on business and technology matters, including digital asset regulation and insurance issues. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. The views expressed are those of the author and not legal advice. Readers should consult qualified counsel regarding their own circumstances.
Lost keys, lost fortunes: the inheritance crisis of digital assets was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this storyWritten by Reid A. Winthrop, Managing Partner, Winthrop Law Group, PC
Digital assets have moved from the fringes of speculation into the mainstream of finance. According to CoinDesk, stablecoins alone now account for more than $288 billion in circulation, with nearly 99% pegged to the US dollar. Tokenised bonds, real estate and even art are being traded daily across distributed ledgers and these real world assets that have been tokenised are projected to be worth $24 billion by the end of 2025 and up to $30 trillion by 2034. Yet beneath the promise of borderless liquidity and programmable money lies a vulnerability often overlooked until it is too late. What happens to digital wealth when its owner dies?
5% of Ethereum tokens and 20% of Bitcoins potentially lost forever
Source: X/Coinbureau
The central problem is one of irretrievability. In traditional finance, executors can locate bank accounts, contact custodians and obtain court orders to access frozen funds. On the blockchain, there is no such recourse — lose the private keys, and the assets are gone forever. Chainalysis estimates that as much as 3.7million Bitcoins worth approximately 20% of all Bitcoin has been lost and 5% of Ethereum tokens are lost due to inaccessible wallets, some forever locked behind forgotten seed phrases. The BBC reported the case of James Howells, who inadvertently threw away a hard drive containing 8,000 BTC, now worth close to a billion and the local council will not allow him to go search for his computer in the refuse tip where he believes the Bitcoins are stored. Unlike a misplaced stock certificate, blockchain-powered digital assets can vanish without a trace once authentication fails. Lawmakers are only beginning to grapple with this new frontier of inheritance. In the United States, adoption of the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (RUFADAA) has given executors conditional rights to access accounts, provided explicit
authorisation exists in wills or trusts. The Uniform Law Commission notes, however, that implementation varies widely across states, leaving estates vulnerable to patchwork enforcement. In the United Kingdom, the proposed Property (Digital Assets) Bill aims to classify crypto holdings as property, making them formally inheritable. Yet even here, the General Data Protection Regulation in Europe complicates matters, sometimes preventing executors from accessing personal digital data without explicit pre-death consent. In emerging markets, where tokenisation is accelerating fastest, probate systems often do not recognise digital assets at all, leaving heirs with no enforceable claim.
The legal uncertainty is compounded by technical barriers. Many exchanges and platforms employ strict two-factor authentication systems that are tied to personal devices. If a phone is lost or a SIM card deactivated, heirs can find themselves permanently locked out. Terms of service often bar third-party access, even for executors with court approval. Big technology firms have tried to provide workarounds: Apple has introduced its “Legacy Contact” program, allowing users to designate successors to iCloud data and Google offers an “Inactive Account Manager” that transfers access after prolonged inactivity. Yet these remain fragmented solutions in a world where most blockchain-native platforms lack similar mechanisms. At the heart of the issue lies a deeper philosophical tension between self-custody and traditional custody services. Advocates of self-sovereignty argue that control of private keys embodies the very ethos of blockchain — financial independence from institutions. Yet this autonomy creates a profound estate planning risk if owners fail to pass on keys securely. According to Fidelity, fewer than 15% of holders of digital assets in 2024 had included these assets in their estate plans. By contrast, custodial models, where banks, platforms or exchanges manage client assets, allow smoother inheritance procedures but often blur the line between ownership and custodianship. When FTX and Celsius collapsed, users discovered that “their” crypto was legally part of the bankruptcy estate, leaving heirs with nothing more than creditor claims, as Reuters has detailed.
Solutions are emerging, but none are yet universal. Some estate planners recommend maintaining a secure digital asset inventory, i.e. an encrypted record of wallets, platforms and authentication instructions kept offline or in a safety deposit box. Blockchain developers are experimenting with inheritance modules in smart contracts where ownership can automatically shift to heirs upon verification of a death certificate through trusted oracles. Multi-signature wallets, where heirs, executors and the original owner each hold a share of the signing authority, provide another safeguard, although they require technical literacy and trust. The notion of a “digital executor” is
also gaining ground: a professional specifically tasked with navigating the technical and legal dimensions of digital estate transfer. But without global standards, such roles remain vulnerable to conflict across jurisdictions. Beyond the legal and technical hurdles lies a human reality — inheriting wealth is already a time of emotional complexity and therefore adding layers of cryptographic processes can deepen the burden. For heirs unfamiliar with digital finance, a stablecoin wallet or tokenised property dashboard may feel alien, even intimidating; the risk is that assets are sold prematurely, transferred incorrectly, or abandoned entirely. Clear communication in life, explaining what digital assets exist, how they fit into an investment strategy and why they were chosen may be as important as estate planning when it comes to digital assets. In the end, inheritance is not just about transmitting value, but about transmitting meaning. The next decade is likely to bring significant convergence between law, technology and financial practice. Regulators are beginning to recognise that tokenisation is not a niche but a structural shift. The European Union’s plan for a
unified digital identity wallet could eventually integrate inheritance rights across borders. Platforms issuing tokenised assets may embed succession planning into their protocols, allowing owners to set heirs, contingent beneficiaries, and even conditional allocations directly into smart contracts. This could reduce disputes and ensure that assets remain productive rather than frozen in limbo.
Yet technology cannot erase the paradox at the heart of the issue. The same features that make blockchain valuable (immutability, decentralisation and autonomy) make it resistant to human contingencies such as death. Will we see digital assets that have not been claimed or moved for 15 years being subject to the UK’s Dormant Assets Scheme, which, already, according the UK government, “has unlocked more than £745m for social and environmental initiatives, from over £1.35bn in dormant bank and building society accounts”? Legal harmonisation may narrow gaps, custodial platforms may offer bridges and smart contracts may automate transfers, but the irreducible challenge remains. How to align a self-sovereign system with the collective needs of society? How can we protect a decentralised product from being lost forever? And, is there an insurance product that can be developed to bring confidence to these assets?
Digital inheritance is thus more than a private planning concern — it is a stress test for the entire digital economy. If billions in tokenised wealth disappear each year into inaccessible wallets, confidence in blockchain as an infrastructure for intergenerational wealth will erode. Conversely, if frameworks for secure transfer mature, blockchain technology could underpin not just the circulation of value in life, but the preservation of legacies across generations. Which raises the central question: can digital finance evolve fast enough to ensure that the wealth we create in code survives us in the world of flesh and blood?
Reid Winthrop is an attorney at Winthrop Law Group, PC in Newport Beach, California, where he advises clients on business and technology matters, including digital asset regulation and insurance issues. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. The views expressed are those of the author and not legal advice. Readers should consult qualified counsel regarding their own circumstances.
Lost keys, lost fortunes: the inheritance crisis of digital assets was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Lost keys, lost fortunes: the inheritance crisis of digital assets
2025/11/05 13:53
Written by Reid A. Winthrop, Managing Partner, Winthrop Law Group, PC
Digital assets have moved from the fringes of speculation into the mainstream of finance. According to CoinDesk, stablecoins alone now account for more than $288 billion in circulation, with nearly 99% pegged to the US dollar. Tokenised bonds, real estate and even art are being traded daily across distributed ledgers and these real world assets that have been tokenised are projected to be worth $24 billion by the end of 2025 and up to $30 trillion by 2034. Yet beneath the promise of borderless liquidity and programmable money lies a vulnerability often overlooked until it is too late. What happens to digital wealth when its owner dies?
5% of Ethereum tokens and 20% of Bitcoins potentially lost forever
Source: X/Coinbureau
The central problem is one of irretrievability. In traditional finance, executors can locate bank accounts, contact custodians and obtain court orders to access frozen funds. On the blockchain, there is no such recourse — lose the private keys, and the assets are gone forever. Chainalysis estimates that as much as 3.7million Bitcoins worth approximately 20% of all Bitcoin has been lost and 5% of Ethereum tokens are lost due to inaccessible wallets, some forever locked behind forgotten seed phrases. The BBC reported the case of James Howells, who inadvertently threw away a hard drive containing 8,000 BTC, now worth close to a billion and the local council will not allow him to go search for his computer in the refuse tip where he believes the Bitcoins are stored. Unlike a misplaced stock certificate, blockchain-powered digital assets can vanish without a trace once authentication fails. Lawmakers are only beginning to grapple with this new frontier of inheritance. In the United States, adoption of the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (RUFADAA) has given executors conditional rights to access accounts, provided explicit
authorisation exists in wills or trusts. The Uniform Law Commission notes, however, that implementation varies widely across states, leaving estates vulnerable to patchwork enforcement. In the United Kingdom, the proposed Property (Digital Assets) Bill aims to classify crypto holdings as property, making them formally inheritable. Yet even here, the General Data Protection Regulation in Europe complicates matters, sometimes preventing executors from accessing personal digital data without explicit pre-death consent. In emerging markets, where tokenisation is accelerating fastest, probate systems often do not recognise digital assets at all, leaving heirs with no enforceable claim.
The legal uncertainty is compounded by technical barriers. Many exchanges and platforms employ strict two-factor authentication systems that are tied to personal devices. If a phone is lost or a SIM card deactivated, heirs can find themselves permanently locked out. Terms of service often bar third-party access, even for executors with court approval. Big technology firms have tried to provide workarounds: Apple has introduced its “Legacy Contact” program, allowing users to designate successors to iCloud data and Google offers an “Inactive Account Manager” that transfers access after prolonged inactivity. Yet these remain fragmented solutions in a world where most blockchain-native platforms lack similar mechanisms. At the heart of the issue lies a deeper philosophical tension between self-custody and traditional custody services. Advocates of self-sovereignty argue that control of private keys embodies the very ethos of blockchain — financial independence from institutions. Yet this autonomy creates a profound estate planning risk if owners fail to pass on keys securely. According to Fidelity, fewer than 15% of holders of digital assets in 2024 had included these assets in their estate plans. By contrast, custodial models, where banks, platforms or exchanges manage client assets, allow smoother inheritance procedures but often blur the line between ownership and custodianship. When FTX and Celsius collapsed, users discovered that “their” crypto was legally part of the bankruptcy estate, leaving heirs with nothing more than creditor claims, as Reuters has detailed.
Solutions are emerging, but none are yet universal. Some estate planners recommend maintaining a secure digital asset inventory, i.e. an encrypted record of wallets, platforms and authentication instructions kept offline or in a safety deposit box. Blockchain developers are experimenting with inheritance modules in smart contracts where ownership can automatically shift to heirs upon verification of a death certificate through trusted oracles. Multi-signature wallets, where heirs, executors and the original owner each hold a share of the signing authority, provide another safeguard, although they require technical literacy and trust. The notion of a “digital executor” is
also gaining ground: a professional specifically tasked with navigating the technical and legal dimensions of digital estate transfer. But without global standards, such roles remain vulnerable to conflict across jurisdictions. Beyond the legal and technical hurdles lies a human reality — inheriting wealth is already a time of emotional complexity and therefore adding layers of cryptographic processes can deepen the burden. For heirs unfamiliar with digital finance, a stablecoin wallet or tokenised property dashboard may feel alien, even intimidating; the risk is that assets are sold prematurely, transferred incorrectly, or abandoned entirely. Clear communication in life, explaining what digital assets exist, how they fit into an investment strategy and why they were chosen may be as important as estate planning when it comes to digital assets. In the end, inheritance is not just about transmitting value, but about transmitting meaning. The next decade is likely to bring significant convergence between law, technology and financial practice. Regulators are beginning to recognise that tokenisation is not a niche but a structural shift. The European Union’s plan for a
unified digital identity wallet could eventually integrate inheritance rights across borders. Platforms issuing tokenised assets may embed succession planning into their protocols, allowing owners to set heirs, contingent beneficiaries, and even conditional allocations directly into smart contracts. This could reduce disputes and ensure that assets remain productive rather than frozen in limbo.
Yet technology cannot erase the paradox at the heart of the issue. The same features that make blockchain valuable (immutability, decentralisation and autonomy) make it resistant to human contingencies such as death. Will we see digital assets that have not been claimed or moved for 15 years being subject to the UK’s Dormant Assets Scheme, which, already, according the UK government, “has unlocked more than £745m for social and environmental initiatives, from over £1.35bn in dormant bank and building society accounts”? Legal harmonisation may narrow gaps, custodial platforms may offer bridges and smart contracts may automate transfers, but the irreducible challenge remains. How to align a self-sovereign system with the collective needs of society? How can we protect a decentralised product from being lost forever? And, is there an insurance product that can be developed to bring confidence to these assets?
Digital inheritance is thus more than a private planning concern — it is a stress test for the entire digital economy. If billions in tokenised wealth disappear each year into inaccessible wallets, confidence in blockchain as an infrastructure for intergenerational wealth will erode. Conversely, if frameworks for secure transfer mature, blockchain technology could underpin not just the circulation of value in life, but the preservation of legacies across generations. Which raises the central question: can digital finance evolve fast enough to ensure that the wealth we create in code survives us in the world of flesh and blood?
Reid Winthrop is an attorney at Winthrop Law Group, PC in Newport Beach, California, where he advises clients on business and technology matters, including digital asset regulation and insurance issues. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. The views expressed are those of the author and not legal advice. Readers should consult qualified counsel regarding their own circumstances.
Lost keys, lost fortunes: the inheritance crisis of digital assets was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights
You May Also Like
CaaS: The "SaaS Moment" for Blockchain
Source: VeradiVerdict Compiled by: Zhou, ChainCatcher Summary Crypto as a Service (CaaS) is the "Software as a Service (SaaS) era" in the blockchain space. Banks and fintech companies no longer need to build crypto infrastructure from scratch. They can simply connect to APIs and white-label platforms to launch digital asset functionality within days or weeks, instead of the years that used to take. ( Note: White-labeling essentially involves one party providing a product or technology, while another party brands it for sale or operation. In the finance/crypto field, this refers to banks or exchanges using third-party trading systems, wallets, or payment gateways and then rebranding them.) Mainstream markets are accelerating adoption through three channels. Banks are partnering with custodians like Coinbase, Anchorage, and BitGo while actively exploring tokenized assets; fintech companies are issuing their own stablecoins using platforms like M^0; and payment processors such as Western Union (with $300 billion in annual transactions) and Zelle (with over $1 trillion in annual transactions) are now integrating stablecoins to enable instant, low-cost cross-border settlements. Crypto as a Service (CaaS) isn't actually that complicated. Essentially, it's Software as a Service (SaaS) based on cryptocurrency, making it a hundred times easier for institutions and businesses to integrate into the cryptocurrency space. Banks, fintech companies, and enterprises no longer need to painstakingly build internal cryptocurrency functionality. Instead, they can simply plug and play, deploying within days using proven APIs and white-label platforms. Businesses can focus on their customers without worrying about the complexities of blockchain. They can leverage existing infrastructure to participate in cryptocurrency transactions more efficiently and cost-effectively. In other words, they can easily and seamlessly integrate into the digital asset ecosystem. CaaS is poised for exponential growth. CaaS is a cloud-based business model and infrastructure solution that enables businesses, fintech companies, and developers to integrate cryptocurrency and blockchain functionality into their operations without having to build or maintain the underlying technology from scratch. CaaS provides ready-to-use, scalable services, typically delivered via APIs or white-label platforms, such as crypto wallets, trading engines, payment gateways, asset storage, custody, and compliance tools. This allows businesses to quickly offer digital asset functionality under their own brand, reducing development costs, time, and required technical expertise. Like other "as-a-service" offerings, this model allows businesses of all sizes, from startups to established companies, to participate in a cost-effective manner. In September 2025, Coinbase Institutional listed CaaS as one of its biggest growth areas. Since 2013, Pantera Capital has been committed to driving the development of CaaS through investment. We strategically invest in infrastructure, tools, and technology to ensure that CaaS can operate at scale. By accelerating the development of backend fund management, custody, and wallets, we have significantly enhanced the service tier of CaaS. Advantages of CaaS By using CaaS to transparently integrate encryption capabilities into their systems, enterprises can achieve numerous strategic and operational advantages more quickly and cost-effectively. These advantages include: One-stop integration and seamless embedding : The CaaS platform eliminates the need for custom development cycles, enabling teams to activate features in days rather than months. Flexible profit models : Businesses can choose a subscription-based fixed-price model for predictable costs, or a pay-as-you-go billing model to keep expenses in line with revenue. Either approach avoids large upfront capital investments. Outsourcing blockchain complexity : Enterprises can offload technical management while benefiting from a powerful enterprise-grade backend, ensuring near-perfect uptime, real-time monitoring, and automatic failover. Developer-friendly APIs and SDKs : Developers can embed wallet creation and key management functions, smoothly handle on-chain settlements, trigger smart contract interactions, and create a comprehensive sandbox environment. White-label branding and an intuitive interface : The CaaS solution is easy to customize, enabling non-technical teams to configure free infrastructure, supported assets, and user onboarding processes. Other value-added features : Leading providers bundle ancillary services together, such as fraud detection based on on-chain analytics; automated tax filing; multi-signature fund management; and cross-chain bridging for asset interoperability. These characteristics transform cryptocurrency from a technological novelty into a revenue-generating product line while maintaining a focus on core business capabilities. Three core use cases We believe the world is rapidly evolving towards a cryptocurrency-native environment, with individuals and businesses interacting more frequently with digital assets. This shift is driven by increasing user acceptance of blockchain wallets, decentralized applications, and on-chain transactions, which in turn benefits from continuously improving user interfaces, abundant educational resources, and practical application value. However, for cryptocurrencies to truly integrate into the mainstream and achieve widespread adoption, a strong and seamless bridge must be built to bridge the gap between traditional finance (TradFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi). Institutions seek the advantages of cryptocurrencies (speed, programmability, and global accessibility) while relying on trustworthy intermediaries to manage their underlying complexities: tools, security, technology stack, and liquidity provision. Ultimately, this ecosystem integration could gradually bring billions of users onto the blockchain. Use Case 1: Bank Banks are increasingly partnering with regulated cryptocurrency custodians such as Coinbase Custody, Anchorage Digital, and BitGo to provide institutional-grade custody, insured storage, and seamless spot trading services for digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum. These foundational services—custody, execution, and basic lending—represent the most readily achievable aspects of cryptocurrency integration, enabling banks to easily embrace customers without forcing them out of the traditional banking system. Beyond these fundamental elements, banks can leverage decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols to generate competitive returns from idle treasury assets or customer deposits. For example, they can deploy stablecoins into permissionless lending markets (such as Morpho, Aave, or Compound) or liquidity pools of automated market makers (AMMs) like Uniswap to obtain real-time, transparent returns that typically outperform traditional fixed-income products. The tokenization of Real-World Assets (RWAs) presents transformative opportunities. Banks can initiate and distribute on-chain versions of traditional securities (e.g., tokenized U.S. Treasury bonds, corporate bonds, private credit, or even real estate funds issued through BlackRock's BUIDL fund), bringing off-chain value to public blockchains like Ethereum, Polygon, or Base. These RWAs can then be traded peer-to-peer through DeFi protocols such as Morpho (for optimizing lending), Pendle (for yield sharing), or Centrifuge (for private credit pools), while ensuring KYC/AML compliance through whitelisted wallets or institutional vaults. RWAs can also serve as high-quality collateral in the DeFi lending market. Crucially, banks can offer seamless stablecoin access without losing customers. Through embedded wallets or custodial sub-accounts, customers can hold USDC, USDT, or FDIC-insured digital dollars directly within the bank's app (for payments, remittances, or yield-generating investments) without leaving the bank's ecosystem. This "walled garden" model resembles a new bank but with regulated trust. Looking ahead, major banks may form alliances to issue branded stablecoins backed 1:1 by centralized reserves. These stablecoins could be settled instantly on public blockchains while complying with regulatory requirements, thus connecting traditional finance with programmable money. If a bank views blockchain as infrastructure, rather than an accessory tool, it is likely to capture the next trillion dollars in value. Use Case 2: Fintech Companies and New Types of Banks Fintech companies and new-age banks are rapidly integrating cryptocurrencies into their core offerings through strategic partnerships with established platforms such as Robinhood, Revolut, and Webull. These collaborations enable seamless use and secure custody of digital assets, while providing instant trading of tokenized versions of traditional stocks, effectively bridging the gap between traditional finance and blockchain-based markets. Beyond partnerships, fintech companies can leverage professional service providers like Alchemy to build and launch their own blockchain infrastructure. Alchemy, a leader in blockchain development platforms, offers scalable node infrastructure, enhanced APIs, and developer tools that simplify the creation of custom Layer-1 or Layer-2 networks. This allows fintech companies to tailor blockchains for specific use cases, such as high-throughput payments, decentralized authentication, or RWA (Risk Weighted Authorization), while ensuring compliance with evolving regulatory requirements and optimizing for low latency and cost-effectiveness. Fintech companies can further deepen their involvement in the cryptocurrency space by issuing their own stablecoins and leveraging decentralized protocols on platforms like M^0 to mint yielding, fungible stablecoins backed by high-quality collateral such as US Treasury bonds. By adopting this model, fintech companies can mint their own tokens on demand, maintain full control over the underlying economic mechanisms (including interest accumulation and redemption mechanisms), ensure regulatory compliance through transparent on-chain reserves, and participate in co-governance through decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs). Furthermore, they can benefit from enhanced liquidity pools on major exchanges and DeFi protocols, reducing fragmentation and increasing user adoption. This approach not only creates new revenue streams but also positions fintech companies as innovators in the field of programmable money and fosters customer loyalty in the competitive digital economy. Use Case 3: Payment Processor Payment companies are building stablecoin "sandwiches": a multi-tiered cross-border settlement system that receives fiat currency at one end and exports instant, low-cost liquidity in another jurisdiction, while minimizing foreign exchange spreads, intermediary fees, and settlement delays. The components of the "sandwich" include: Top Slice (Entry Point) : US customers send US dollars to payment providers such as Stripe, Circle, Ripple, or newer banks like Mercury. Filling (minting) : US dollars are immediately exchanged at a 1:1 ratio for regulated stablecoins—usually USDC (Circle), USDP (Paxos), or bank-issued digital dollars. Bottom Slice (Export) : Stablecoins are bridged or exchanged for local currency stablecoins—for example, aARS (pegged to the Argentine peso), BRLA (Brazil), or MXNA (Mexico)—or become central bank digital currency pilot projects directly (for example, Drex in Brazil). Settlement : Funds arrive in local bank accounts, mobile wallets or merchant payments on a T+0 (instant) basis, with total costs typically below 0.1%, compared to 3-7% through SWIFT + agent banks. Western Union, a 175-year-old remittance giant that processes over $300 billion in remittances annually, recently announced the integration of stablecoins into its ecosystem. Pantera Capital CEO Devin McGranahan stated in July 2025 that the company had historically been "cautious" about cryptocurrencies, concerned about their volatility and regulatory issues. However, the enactment of the Genius Act has changed this. “As the rules become clearer, we see a real opportunity to integrate digital assets into our business,” McGranahan said on the Q3 2025 earnings call. The result: Western Union is currently actively testing stablecoin solutions for Treasury settlements and customer payments, leveraging blockchain technology to eliminate the cumbersome processes of correspondent banking. Zelle, a bank-backed peer-to-peer payment giant (part of Early Warning Services, a consortium of JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and others), facilitates over $1 trillion in fee-free transfers annually within the United States via simple phone numbers or email addresses, currently boasting over 2,300 partner institutions and 150 million users. However, cross-border payments have been a previous challenge. On October 24, 2025, Early Warning announced a stablecoin plan aimed at bringing Zelle to the international market, offering "the same speed and reliability" overseas. As banks, fintech/new banks, and payment processors integrate cryptocurrencies in an intuitive, plug-and-play, and compliant manner (with as few regulators as possible), they can continue to expand their global reach and strengthen relationships. in conclusion CaaS is not hype—it represents a revolution in infrastructure that makes cryptocurrencies invisible to end users. Just as people don't think of AWS when watching Netflix or Salesforce when checking a CRM, consumers and businesses won't think of blockchain when making instant cross-border payments or accessing tokenized assets. The winners of this revolution are not companies that add cryptocurrencies as an afterthought to traditional systems, but rather institutions and enterprises that see blockchain as infrastructure, and the investors who support the underlying technology that underpins it all.
Share
PANews2025/11/05 16:00
CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options
The post CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. An announcement was made by CME Group, the largest derivatives exchanger worldwide, revealed that it would introduce options for Solana and XRP futures. It is the latest addition to CME crypto derivatives as institutions and retail investors increase their demand for Solana and XRP. CME Expands Crypto Offerings With Solana and XRP Options Launch According to a press release, the launch is scheduled for October 13, 2025, pending regulatory approval. The new products will allow traders to access options on Solana, Micro Solana, XRP, and Micro XRP futures. Expiries will be offered on business days on a monthly, and quarterly basis to provide more flexibility to market players. CME Group said the contracts are designed to meet demand from institutions, hedge funds, and active retail traders. According to Giovanni Vicioso, the launch reflects high liquidity in Solana and XRP futures. Vicioso is the Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products for the CME Group. He noted that the new contracts will provide additional tools for risk management and exposure strategies. Recently, CME XRP futures registered record open interest amid ETF approval optimism, reinforcing confidence in contract demand. Cumberland, one of the leading liquidity providers, welcomed the development and said it highlights the shift beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. FalconX, another trading firm, added that rising digital asset treasuries are increasing the need for hedging tools on alternative tokens like Solana and XRP. High Record Trading Volumes Demand Solana and XRP Futures Solana futures and XRP continue to gain popularity since their launch earlier this year. According to CME official records, many have bought and sold more than 540,000 Solana futures contracts since March. A value that amounts to over $22 billion dollars. Solana contracts hit a record 9,000 contracts in August, worth $437 million. Open interest also set a record at 12,500 contracts.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:39
FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt
De Britse financiële waakhond, de FCA, komt in 2026 met nieuwe regels speciaal voor crypto bedrijven. Wat direct opvalt: de toezichthouder laat enkele klassieke financiële verplichtingen los om beter aan te sluiten op de snelle en grillige wereld van digitale activa. Tegelijkertijd wordt er extra nadruk gelegd op digitale beveiliging,... Het bericht FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt verscheen het eerst op Blockchain Stories.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:33