Jefferies dropped a bomb in front of its investors. Rich Handler, the bank’s CEO, came out swinging on Thursday, saying loud and clear: “We believe we were defrauded, OK?” That statement hit as the firm scrambled to explain why it had so much exposure to First Brands Group, the now-bankrupt auto parts supplier. This wasn’t some minor position. Jefferies had helped the company raise billions in debt while also having its own cash tied up through Point Bonita Capital, one of its investment arms. Over the past month, Jefferies’ shares have dropped 25%, a straight punch to the gut. Handler made the remarks during a tense investor day, where analysts didn’t hold back on questions about how deep the First Brands mess goes. “I’ll just say, this is us personally, we believe we were defrauded,” Handler said, clearly frustrated as the pressure built. Point Bonita fund faces backlash over $715mn First Brands exposure This all comes as broader fears about credit quality hit U.S. banks hard. The KBW Regional Bank Index dropped 6% on Thursday alone, while names like Western Alliance and Zions Bank disclosed their own messy run-ins with allegedly fraudulent borrowers. At the same time, Tricolor, a separate auto lender, is also being scrutinized for loan issues. That’s thrown more fuel on the fire, making some investors say this isn’t just a one-off. One investor flat-out called it a “risk management 101 failure,” referring to the fact that Point Bonita had $715 million worth of exposure tied to First Brands. Ian Lapey from Gabelli said this whole thing was getting harder to spin as some random, isolated event, especially since Jefferies’ own hedge fund recently took a hit from an alleged Ponzi scheme too. Handler had to sit through all of it. Jefferies’ president Brian Friedman pushed back, saying the exposure was mostly to First Brands’ “investment-grade-rated customers,” and tried to frame that as a positive. He argued that Jefferies itself didn’t have as much skin in the game, since it only owned a small part of the equity in the fund. But no one in that room was buying easy answers. Jefferies leveraged finance linked to $6bn deal with First Brands It wasn’t just about Point Bonita. Jefferies’ leveraged finance unit also helped First Brands raise cash multiple times. One big deal, a $6 billion loan, got pulled in August after red flags started popping up. That alone raised questions about what Jefferies really knew, and when. Handler insisted Jefferies wasn’t helping First Brands acquire companies behind the scenes. In his words: “We were actually helping clients sell their companies and they were the buyer.” He even joked at one point that some of the questions were “giving my general counsel a heart attack.” But this isn’t comedy hour. The fund’s exposure and the fact that Jefferies played middleman in debt deals have created a serious credibility issue. Friedman added: “If this was fraud — and we don’t know — there’s going to be a knockdown process in bankruptcy court and we’re going to see what’s learned.” He didn’t offer anything more concrete. Handler also said Jefferies is still doing fine: “We’re basically having a good; can I say we’re having a good quarter? Allowed to?” But that didn’t land well either. Damage is damage. Outside the room, the collapse of First Brands and Tricolor sparked a bigger fight. Handler didn’t sugarcoat it. He said: “There’s a fight going on right now between the banks and direct lenders… each wants to point fingers… it’s your fault, no, it’s your fault.” Jefferies, for now, is pointing right at First Brands. Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.Jefferies dropped a bomb in front of its investors. Rich Handler, the bank’s CEO, came out swinging on Thursday, saying loud and clear: “We believe we were defrauded, OK?” That statement hit as the firm scrambled to explain why it had so much exposure to First Brands Group, the now-bankrupt auto parts supplier. This wasn’t some minor position. Jefferies had helped the company raise billions in debt while also having its own cash tied up through Point Bonita Capital, one of its investment arms. Over the past month, Jefferies’ shares have dropped 25%, a straight punch to the gut. Handler made the remarks during a tense investor day, where analysts didn’t hold back on questions about how deep the First Brands mess goes. “I’ll just say, this is us personally, we believe we were defrauded,” Handler said, clearly frustrated as the pressure built. Point Bonita fund faces backlash over $715mn First Brands exposure This all comes as broader fears about credit quality hit U.S. banks hard. The KBW Regional Bank Index dropped 6% on Thursday alone, while names like Western Alliance and Zions Bank disclosed their own messy run-ins with allegedly fraudulent borrowers. At the same time, Tricolor, a separate auto lender, is also being scrutinized for loan issues. That’s thrown more fuel on the fire, making some investors say this isn’t just a one-off. One investor flat-out called it a “risk management 101 failure,” referring to the fact that Point Bonita had $715 million worth of exposure tied to First Brands. Ian Lapey from Gabelli said this whole thing was getting harder to spin as some random, isolated event, especially since Jefferies’ own hedge fund recently took a hit from an alleged Ponzi scheme too. Handler had to sit through all of it. Jefferies’ president Brian Friedman pushed back, saying the exposure was mostly to First Brands’ “investment-grade-rated customers,” and tried to frame that as a positive. He argued that Jefferies itself didn’t have as much skin in the game, since it only owned a small part of the equity in the fund. But no one in that room was buying easy answers. Jefferies leveraged finance linked to $6bn deal with First Brands It wasn’t just about Point Bonita. Jefferies’ leveraged finance unit also helped First Brands raise cash multiple times. One big deal, a $6 billion loan, got pulled in August after red flags started popping up. That alone raised questions about what Jefferies really knew, and when. Handler insisted Jefferies wasn’t helping First Brands acquire companies behind the scenes. In his words: “We were actually helping clients sell their companies and they were the buyer.” He even joked at one point that some of the questions were “giving my general counsel a heart attack.” But this isn’t comedy hour. The fund’s exposure and the fact that Jefferies played middleman in debt deals have created a serious credibility issue. Friedman added: “If this was fraud — and we don’t know — there’s going to be a knockdown process in bankruptcy court and we’re going to see what’s learned.” He didn’t offer anything more concrete. Handler also said Jefferies is still doing fine: “We’re basically having a good; can I say we’re having a good quarter? Allowed to?” But that didn’t land well either. Damage is damage. Outside the room, the collapse of First Brands and Tricolor sparked a bigger fight. Handler didn’t sugarcoat it. He said: “There’s a fight going on right now between the banks and direct lenders… each wants to point fingers… it’s your fault, no, it’s your fault.” Jefferies, for now, is pointing right at First Brands. Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

Jefferies shares tumble as CEO alleges fraud tied to First Brands exposure

2025/10/18 01:20

Jefferies dropped a bomb in front of its investors. Rich Handler, the bank’s CEO, came out swinging on Thursday, saying loud and clear: “We believe we were defrauded, OK?”

That statement hit as the firm scrambled to explain why it had so much exposure to First Brands Group, the now-bankrupt auto parts supplier. This wasn’t some minor position. Jefferies had helped the company raise billions in debt while also having its own cash tied up through Point Bonita Capital, one of its investment arms.

Over the past month, Jefferies’ shares have dropped 25%, a straight punch to the gut. Handler made the remarks during a tense investor day, where analysts didn’t hold back on questions about how deep the First Brands mess goes. “I’ll just say, this is us personally, we believe we were defrauded,” Handler said, clearly frustrated as the pressure built.

Point Bonita fund faces backlash over $715mn First Brands exposure

This all comes as broader fears about credit quality hit U.S. banks hard. The KBW Regional Bank Index dropped 6% on Thursday alone, while names like Western Alliance and Zions Bank disclosed their own messy run-ins with allegedly fraudulent borrowers.

At the same time, Tricolor, a separate auto lender, is also being scrutinized for loan issues. That’s thrown more fuel on the fire, making some investors say this isn’t just a one-off.

One investor flat-out called it a “risk management 101 failure,” referring to the fact that Point Bonita had $715 million worth of exposure tied to First Brands. Ian Lapey from Gabelli said this whole thing was getting harder to spin as some random, isolated event, especially since Jefferies’ own hedge fund recently took a hit from an alleged Ponzi scheme too. Handler had to sit through all of it.

Jefferies’ president Brian Friedman pushed back, saying the exposure was mostly to First Brands’ “investment-grade-rated customers,” and tried to frame that as a positive. He argued that Jefferies itself didn’t have as much skin in the game, since it only owned a small part of the equity in the fund. But no one in that room was buying easy answers.

Jefferies leveraged finance linked to $6bn deal with First Brands

It wasn’t just about Point Bonita. Jefferies’ leveraged finance unit also helped First Brands raise cash multiple times. One big deal, a $6 billion loan, got pulled in August after red flags started popping up. That alone raised questions about what Jefferies really knew, and when.

Handler insisted Jefferies wasn’t helping First Brands acquire companies behind the scenes. In his words: “We were actually helping clients sell their companies and they were the buyer.”

He even joked at one point that some of the questions were “giving my general counsel a heart attack.” But this isn’t comedy hour. The fund’s exposure and the fact that Jefferies played middleman in debt deals have created a serious credibility issue.

Friedman added: “If this was fraud — and we don’t know — there’s going to be a knockdown process in bankruptcy court and we’re going to see what’s learned.” He didn’t offer anything more concrete.

Handler also said Jefferies is still doing fine: “We’re basically having a good; can I say we’re having a good quarter? Allowed to?” But that didn’t land well either. Damage is damage.

Outside the room, the collapse of First Brands and Tricolor sparked a bigger fight. Handler didn’t sugarcoat it. He said: “There’s a fight going on right now between the banks and direct lenders… each wants to point fingers… it’s your fault, no, it’s your fault.” Jefferies, for now, is pointing right at First Brands.

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Why Is Crypto Down Today? – October 30, 2025

Why Is Crypto Down Today? – October 30, 2025

The crypto market is down today, with the total cryptocurrency market capitalization falling by 3.0% to $3.78 trillion, according to data from CoinMarketCap. Meanwhile, the 24-hour trading volume sits at $192 billion, reflecting reduced activity as major cryptocurrencies turn red. TLDR: The global crypto market cap fell 3.0% to $3.78T; 8 of the top 10 coins and most majors in the red; BTC dropped 3.5% to $109,373, while ETH slid 3.6% to $3,868; The Fed’s 25 bps rate cut and the end of quantitative tightening in December signal returning liquidity; Fear & Greed Index fell to 34 (Fear); BTC ETFs saw $470.7M outflows; ETH ETFs posted $81.44M outflows; AUSTRAC fined CryptoLink A$56,340 (US$37,085) for AML compliance failures. Crypto Winners & Losers At the time of writing, 8 of the top 10 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization have declined over the past 24 hours. Bitcoin (BTC) fell 3.5%, now trading at $109,373, maintaining a market cap of over $2.18 trillion. Ethereum (ETH) slipped 3.6% to $3,868, while BNB (BNB) dropped 0.5% to $1,107. XRP (XRP) recorded a 4.4% decline to $2.54, and Solana (SOL) lost 3.9%, now priced at $190.92. The biggest drop among the top 10 came from Dogecoin (DOGE), which fell 4.4% to $0.1872. Despite the broader downturn, a few altcoins posted impressive gains. Aurora (AURORA) surged 65.1% to $0.08555, while Jelly-My-Jelly (JMJ) and Anvil (ANVL) rose 50.6% and 44.0%, respectively. In contrast, PepeNode (PNODE) and BlockchainFX (BFX) topped the list of trending tokens despite declines of 19.7% and 5.7%, showing strong retail interest amid market volatility. Meanwhile, Swiss-based asset manager 21Shares has filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to launch a Hyperliquid (HYPE) exchange-traded fund (ETF) amid growing institutional appetite for altcoin-linked investment products. The move came just weeks after Bitwise filed for a similar Hyperliquid ETF, underscoring intensifying competition among asset managers to capture investor demand for exposure to decentralized trading ecosystems. The HYPE token powers Hyperliquid’s decentralized exchange, offering users fee discounts and serving as the gas token for its blockchain. Bitcoin Holds Strong as Altcoins Lag Despite Fed Rate Cut and End of QT The US Federal Reserve’s latest 25 basis-point rate cut unfolded as expected, sending Bitcoin briefly down to $109K. However, the real market mover was the Fed’s confirmation that quantitative tightening (QT) will end in December, signaling the return of liquidity that could fuel risk assets. Analysts say this could set the stage for an “alt season,” though past patterns show such optimism often fades quickly. In 2024, the first rate cut triggered a strong rally, but it fizzled by September, only to be reignited by Trump’s election victory later that year. Despite those bursts of momentum, most altcoins have failed to reclaim their 2021 highs, while Bitcoin remains the only asset consistently trending upward. Major tokens like ETH, SOL, and XRP remain more than 40% below their peaks, showing a market still in a consolidation phase. Analysts view the current market as a reset rather than a crash, where liquidity is shifting rather than expanding. Solana and XRP both appear to be stabilizing, with record futures open interest near $3 billion each on CME. Levels & Events to Watch Next At the time of writing, Bitcoin trades at $109,295, down 0.68% on the day. The coin has been consolidating after failing to sustain momentum above $112,000 earlier this week. For now, BTC’s intraday range sits between $108,800 and $110,200, suggesting a cautious market tone. A breakout above $111,800 could trigger a move toward $114,500 and potentially $118,000, where previous resistance zones lie. On the downside, failure to hold current support could open the door to $107,500, followed by a stronger support area around $105,000. Meanwhile, Ethereum trades at $3,865, down 0.99% in the past 24 hours. The coin has been hovering near the $3,850–$3,900 zone after slipping from its weekly high near $4,100. If ETH breaks above $3,950, it could attempt to retest $4,200 and then $4,400, where selling pressure has repeatedly capped rallies. However, a drop below $3,800 may lead to a deeper pullback toward $3,650–$3,700 in the short term. Meanwhile, market sentiment has tilted slightly more bearish, with the Crypto Fear and Greed Index falling to 34, signaling “Fear.” The index was at 39 yesterday and 43 a month ago, indicating a steady decline in confidence as traders remain cautious amid price volatility. The shift reflects ongoing uncertainty in the market, with participants holding back from aggressive positions while awaiting clearer signals from macroeconomic developments. The US Bitcoin spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) saw a sharp reversal on Wednesday, recording $470.7 million in outflows, according to data from SoSoValue. The total cumulative net inflow now stands at $61.87 billion, with total net assets valued at $149.98 billion, representing 6.75% of Bitcoin’s market capitalization. Among the funds, Fidelity’s FBTC led the outflows with $164.36 million, followed by Ark & 21Shares (ARKB) with $143.8 million, and BlackRock’s IBIT with $88.08 million. Grayscale’s GBTC also saw $65.01 million leave the fund. The US Ethereum spot ETFs also recorded $81.44 million in outflows on Wednesday. The total cumulative net inflow now stands at $14.65 billion, while total net assets are valued at $26.60 billion, representing 5.58% of Ethereum’s market capitalization. Among the nine ETFs, BlackRock’s ETHA was the only major fund to post gains, taking in $21.36 million. In contrast, Fidelity’s FETH saw the largest outflow at $69.49 million, followed by Grayscale’s ETHE with $12.83 million and Grayscale’s ETH with $16.18 million. In contrast, the US Solana spot ETFs recorded $47.94 million in net inflows on Wednesday. The total cumulative net inflow now stands at $117.40 million, with total net assets reaching $432.29 million, representing 0.40% of Solana’s market capitalization. Among the two listed ETFs, Bitwise’s BSOL led with $46.54 million in inflows, while Grayscale’s GSOL added $1.40 million. Total trading volume across both funds was $79.50 million for the day. Meanwhile, Australian financial intelligence agency, AUSTRAC, slapped a AU$56,340 fine (US$37,085) on crypto ATM operator CryptoLink on Thursday. The action comes after the regulator’s Crypto Taskforce, established last year, found late reporting of large cash transactions and “weaknesses” in CryptoLink’s AML rules
Share
CryptoNews2025/10/30 23:12
Fed forecasts only one rate cut in 2026, a more conservative outlook than expected

Fed forecasts only one rate cut in 2026, a more conservative outlook than expected

The post Fed forecasts only one rate cut in 2026, a more conservative outlook than expected appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell talks to reporters following the regular Federal Open Market Committee meetings at the Fed on July 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images The Federal Reserve is projecting only one rate cut in 2026, fewer than expected, according to its median projection. The central bank’s so-called dot plot, which shows 19 individual members’ expectations anonymously, indicated a median estimate of 3.4% for the federal funds rate at the end of 2026. That compares to a median estimate of 3.6% for the end of this year following two expected cuts on top of Wednesday’s reduction. A single quarter-point reduction next year is significantly more conservative than current market pricing. Traders are currently pricing in at two to three more rate cuts next year, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch tool, updated shortly after the decision. The gauge uses prices on 30-day fed funds futures contracts to determine market-implied odds for rate moves. Here are the Fed’s latest targets from 19 FOMC members, both voters and nonvoters: Zoom In IconArrows pointing outwards The forecasts, however, showed a large difference of opinion with two voting members seeing as many as four cuts. Three officials penciled in three rate reductions next year. “Next year’s dot plot is a mosaic of different perspectives and is an accurate reflection of a confusing economic outlook, muddied by labor supply shifts, data measurement concerns, and government policy upheaval and uncertainty,” said Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management. The central bank has two policy meetings left for the year, one in October and one in December. Economic projections from the Fed saw slightly faster economic growth in 2026 than was projected in June, while the outlook for inflation was updated modestly higher for next year. There’s a lot of uncertainty…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:59