TLDR Ethereum ETFs recorded a total net inflow of $246.02 million on October 28. Bitcoin ETFs saw lower inflows for the day, totaling $202.48 million. Fidelity’s Ethereum ETF led the Ethereum inflows with $99.27 million. Ark & 21Shares ARKB topped Bitcoin ETFs with $75.84 million in inflows. BlackRock’s ETHA and Grayscale’s ETH added $76.37 million [...] The post Ethereum ETFs Outpace Bitcoin with $246M Inflows on October 28 appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Ethereum ETFs recorded a total net inflow of $246.02 million on October 28. Bitcoin ETFs saw lower inflows for the day, totaling $202.48 million. Fidelity’s Ethereum ETF led the Ethereum inflows with $99.27 million. Ark & 21Shares ARKB topped Bitcoin ETFs with $75.84 million in inflows. BlackRock’s ETHA and Grayscale’s ETH added $76.37 million [...] The post Ethereum ETFs Outpace Bitcoin with $246M Inflows on October 28 appeared first on CoinCentral.

Ethereum ETFs Outpace Bitcoin with $246M Inflows on October 28

2025/10/29 17:21

TLDR

  • Ethereum ETFs recorded a total net inflow of $246.02 million on October 28.
  • Bitcoin ETFs saw lower inflows for the day, totaling $202.48 million.
  • Fidelity’s Ethereum ETF led the Ethereum inflows with $99.27 million.
  • Ark & 21Shares ARKB topped Bitcoin ETFs with $75.84 million in inflows.
  • BlackRock’s ETHA and Grayscale’s ETH added $76.37 million and $73.03 million, respectively.

On October 28, Ethereum ETFs recorded higher inflows than Bitcoin ETFs. Bitcoin ETFs posted $202.48 million, while Ethereum ETFs reached $246.02 million. Both asset classes saw strong activity, with no reported outflows in most funds.

Bitcoin ETFs Register $202.48 Million in Inflows

Bitcoin ETFs posted $202.48 million in inflows, supported by only three funds. Ark & 21Shares ARKB led with $75.84 million in net inflows. Fidelity’s FBTC followed closely, recording $67.05 million during the trading session.

BlackRock’s IBIT trailed with $59.60 million in inflows but avoided any outflows. All three funds added assets without reductions for the day. The total trading value hit $4.18 billion across Bitcoin ETFs.

Combined net assets under management totaled $154.81 billion as of Tuesday. This represented 6.88% of Bitcoin’s total market capitalization. Bitcoin’s overall trading volume rose by nearly 12% to $64.8 billion.

Bitcoin’s price dropped 1.06% over the past 24 hours, reaching $112,701. The total market cap was reported at $2.24 trillion. Despite the price dip, ETF activity indicated investor engagement.

Ethereum ETFs Record $246.02 Million in Inflows

Ethereum ETFs posted higher inflows than Bitcoin ETFs, reaching $246.02 million. Fidelity’s FETH led the group with $99.27 million in new assets. BlackRock’s ETHA reported $76.37 million in inflows for the day.

Grayscale’s ETH fund also added $73.03 million to its holdings. Only Grayscale’s ETHE posted any outflows, totaling $2.66 million. Other Ethereum ETFs showed strong investor confidence.

Ethereum ETFs recorded a trading volume of $1.64 billion on Tuesday. Their total net assets amounted to $27.66 billion. This represented 5.76% of the total Ethereum market capitalization.

Ethereum was priced at $4,010, down 2.15% over the last 24 hours. Its total trading volume stood at $37.8 billion. The market cap was approximately $484.8 billion.

Ethereum ETFs Lead Market with Higher Daily Gains

Ethereum ETFs surpassed Bitcoin ETFs in daily inflows by over $43 million. Investor activity concentrated in a few large funds. Fidelity FETH captured the largest single-day inflow across all crypto ETFs.

Ethereum ETFs dominated daily ETF rankings in terms of net inflow. Strong activity followed recent volatility in the crypto market. Trading remained active despite minor price dips in both assets.

Ethereum ETFs displayed strong trading momentum throughout the session. Most funds showed only inflows, with minimal outflows reported. Market participation remained high in both volume and value.

Data from SoSoValue confirmed Tuesday’s flows and market performance. Both Bitcoin and Ethereum continue recovering after October’s market decline. Prices dipped, but ETF activity remained high on October 28.

The post Ethereum ETFs Outpace Bitcoin with $246M Inflows on October 28 appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

“Circle Just Solved the $29 Trillion Crypto Adoption Problem

“Circle Just Solved the $29 Trillion Crypto Adoption Problem

Circle’s new project, ARC Testnet, has caught the financial world’s attention for one reason: the list of participants is staggering. BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, Visa, Mastercard, and Deutsche Bank are all tied in. But the real breakthrough lies in a simple innovation, USD-denominated gas fees. By allowing blockchain transactions to be paid directly in dollars rather than volatile crypto, Circle may have just eliminated the final obstacle keeping $29 trillion in global pension funds out of the digital asset markets. For years, institutional investors have hesitated to enter crypto not because of lack of infrastructure, but because of operational risk tied to crypto-denominated fees and fluctuating assets. Circle’s ARC testnet bypasses that entirely, creating a compliance-friendly environment where gas can be paid in stablecoins. This seemingly small detail creates massive implications. Suddenly, large funds can settle, custody, and transact entirely within a digital framework that still operates in fiat terms. That’s an open invitation for financial institutions that already manage tens of trillions in traditional markets. While ARC mainnet is not expected until 2026, insiders say budget allocations for pilot programs are already happening now. Financial institutions are treating ARC preparedness as a 2025 line item. The timing could not be more strategic given that Circle’s anticipated IPO will require a strong growth narrative. By positioning ARC as the missing layer between traditional money and blockchain efficiency, Circle is painting itself as the company that can finally merge the financial system’s past and future. If the rollout continues smoothly, the stablecoin issuer could pivot from utility provider to infrastructure backbone for institutional crypto adoption. Circle’s pitch isn’t about speculation anymore, it’s about owning the rails of the next global financial upgrade. “Circle Just Solved the $29 Trillion Crypto Adoption Problem was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/10/30 14:46
Speculation as Culture

Speculation as Culture

We used to build things because we believed in them. Now, we build because someone might buy them. Speculation isn’t just a financial behavior anymore — it’s a cultural operating system. From crypto tokens to content virality to design trends, we live in a world where potential value has replaced real value. Everything is a pre-launch, a teaser, a drop. Even ideas are traded like assets, inflated with hype before they ever mature. Web3 was supposed to decentralize ownership, but what it really decentralized was attention. We all became investors in narratives. Every creator is now a startup; every tweet is an IPO. The new capitalism isn’t about production — it’s about participation in momentum. The problem? Momentum doesn’t create meaning. Design has absorbed this sickness too. Products are released half-finished, optimized for FOMO instead of function. Brands trade authenticity for aesthetics that look “investable.” And creatives — once obsessed with craft — are now caught in loops of engagement farming. It’s not “What did you make?” anymore. It’s “How many noticed before it was over?” Speculation rewards velocity, not vision. It turns creativity into a casino, where we keep betting on our own relevance. Even the language of art has shifted — “drops,” “floor price,” “community alpha.” We stopped talking about what something means and started asking what it’s worth. This economy of anticipation keeps us in a constant state of almost. We’re always on the verge of the next thing — but nothing lands, nothing lingers. Attention, like capital, has become liquidity. To create meaning again, design has to resist this speculative loop. It has to slow down, to reclaim patience as a form of rebellion. The future shouldn’t just be bought early — it should be built deliberately. Because right now, speculation is our culture’s addiction. And the house always wins. Speculation as Culture was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/10/30 14:46