The post Biden’s Bigger Tax Credits Push Rising Healthcare Costs Onto Taxpayers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. High angle view of a Japanese female caregiver doing home finance online on a computer together with her worried elderly patient at his home. getty Two recent surveys of employers suggest that employee health insurance premiums are likely to increase by around 6.5% in 2026. This increase comes at a bad time for consumers, as inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target and the labor market is weakening. It is also bad news for taxpayers who subsidize health insurance plans bought on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplaces since higher costs mean larger taxpayer subsidies. Fortunately, taxpayers will see some relief if Congress allows the expanded premium tax credits implemented during the Biden administration to expire at the end of the year. In 2021, Congress expanded the ACA’s premium tax credits (PTC) as part of the American Rescue Plan (ARPA) Act. Passed on party lines with all Republicans voting against it, the ARPA expanded the tax credits in two ways. First, it eliminated the maximum income limit for subsidy eligibility. Second, it reduced and, in some cases, eliminated the individual premium contribution. Democrats originally sold the expanded PTC as a temporary measure to help people cope with the COVID pandemic, but it was later extended by 2022’s Inflation Reduction Act to the end of 2025. The expanded PTC has cost taxpayers a substantial amount of money. Under the PTC expansion, households earning between 100% and 150% of the federal poverty level are not expected to pay any premiums for their insurance coverage. Prior to the expansion, similar households were expected to have some skin the game, paying between 2% and 4% of their monthly income towards their premium. According to a report from the Economic Policy Innovation Center this requires taxpayers picking up an extra $2,000 per year for… The post Biden’s Bigger Tax Credits Push Rising Healthcare Costs Onto Taxpayers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. High angle view of a Japanese female caregiver doing home finance online on a computer together with her worried elderly patient at his home. getty Two recent surveys of employers suggest that employee health insurance premiums are likely to increase by around 6.5% in 2026. This increase comes at a bad time for consumers, as inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target and the labor market is weakening. It is also bad news for taxpayers who subsidize health insurance plans bought on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplaces since higher costs mean larger taxpayer subsidies. Fortunately, taxpayers will see some relief if Congress allows the expanded premium tax credits implemented during the Biden administration to expire at the end of the year. In 2021, Congress expanded the ACA’s premium tax credits (PTC) as part of the American Rescue Plan (ARPA) Act. Passed on party lines with all Republicans voting against it, the ARPA expanded the tax credits in two ways. First, it eliminated the maximum income limit for subsidy eligibility. Second, it reduced and, in some cases, eliminated the individual premium contribution. Democrats originally sold the expanded PTC as a temporary measure to help people cope with the COVID pandemic, but it was later extended by 2022’s Inflation Reduction Act to the end of 2025. The expanded PTC has cost taxpayers a substantial amount of money. Under the PTC expansion, households earning between 100% and 150% of the federal poverty level are not expected to pay any premiums for their insurance coverage. Prior to the expansion, similar households were expected to have some skin the game, paying between 2% and 4% of their monthly income towards their premium. According to a report from the Economic Policy Innovation Center this requires taxpayers picking up an extra $2,000 per year for…

Biden’s Bigger Tax Credits Push Rising Healthcare Costs Onto Taxpayers

2025/09/13 03:16

High angle view of a Japanese female caregiver doing home finance online on a computer together with her worried elderly patient at his home.

getty

Two recent surveys of employers suggest that employee health insurance premiums are likely to increase by around 6.5% in 2026. This increase comes at a bad time for consumers, as inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target and the labor market is weakening. It is also bad news for taxpayers who subsidize health insurance plans bought on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplaces since higher costs mean larger taxpayer subsidies. Fortunately, taxpayers will see some relief if Congress allows the expanded premium tax credits implemented during the Biden administration to expire at the end of the year.

In 2021, Congress expanded the ACA’s premium tax credits (PTC) as part of the American Rescue Plan (ARPA) Act. Passed on party lines with all Republicans voting against it, the ARPA expanded the tax credits in two ways. First, it eliminated the maximum income limit for subsidy eligibility. Second, it reduced and, in some cases, eliminated the individual premium contribution. Democrats originally sold the expanded PTC as a temporary measure to help people cope with the COVID pandemic, but it was later extended by 2022’s Inflation Reduction Act to the end of 2025.

The expanded PTC has cost taxpayers a substantial amount of money. Under the PTC expansion, households earning between 100% and 150% of the federal poverty level are not expected to pay any premiums for their insurance coverage. Prior to the expansion, similar households were expected to have some skin the game, paying between 2% and 4% of their monthly income towards their premium. According to a report from the Economic Policy Innovation Center this requires taxpayers picking up an extra $2,000 per year for a family of four earning 150% of the federal poverty level. Higher income households receive even larger benefits from the PTC expansion: A four-person household earning $96,500, or 300% of the federal poverty level, gets an extra premium subsidy of $3,700 per year.

These household subsidies add up. The Urban Institute estimates that the larger PTCs will cause an extra 7.2 million people to get taxpayer-supported ACA coverage. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that a permanent expansion of the PTC would add $383 billion to the federal deficit over 10 years, or nearly $40 billion per year. This is a hard pill to swallow given the country’s already dire fiscal outlook, as the debt-to-GDP ratio is on pace to hit 120% of GDP by 2035, up from 100% today.

In addition to the cost concerns, there is also evidence of fraud in the program. The government gives the tax credits directly to the insurers based on an enrollee’s projected income. During tax season enrollees are supposed to reconcile the income they actually earned throughout the year with the taxpayer subsidies they received, but this does not always happen. According to a report from the Paragon Health Institute, federal law limits the Treasury Department’s ability to recover subsidies if too much money is advanced to the insurer. There is also no repayment mechanism in place for people who misestimated their income to qualify for a subsidy. Paragon estimates that there were 6.4 million improper enrollees in 2025 who received taxpayer subsidies.

There has also been a big spike in enrollees who never make a claim—no doctor visit, lab test, or prescription—which is another sign of fraudulent enrollees. Even though these enrollees do not use any services, taxpayers still pay. In 2024, taxpayers paid insurers $35 billion for people who paid no premiums themselves and never used their plan.

These taxpayer subsidies are not sustainable. The federal government is currently running the largest peacetime deficits in U.S. history—more than $1.8 trillion in 2024 and on pace for a similar amount in 2025. Large deficits crowd out private-sector investment, make things like home and auto loans more expensive, slow economic growth, and contribute to inflation.

What policymakers need to do is find ways to connect people to jobs. If more people had private insurance, they would not need taxpayer subsidies. This means schools and universities that actually teach useful skills to prepare people for meaningful work. We also need to reform our government training programs so they provide a bridge to the market economy. Utah’s one-door model that integrates workforce and safety-net services to help people find jobs is an example other states can learn from.

Finally, we need to reduce the cost of healthcare, not just hide it by pushing it onto taxpayers. Eliminating certificate of need laws that restrict the supply of medical care fosters more competition and helps bring down prices. Reforming scope of practice laws so more nurses and other medical professionals can provide the services they are trained to provide would also help. We could also give people more control over their healthcare spending via universal savings accounts that allow people to save money for healthcare and other expenses tax free. This would encourage folks to shop around for non-emergency care to find the best value.

The Biden-era PTC expansion did not make healthcare cheaper; it just hid the cost. Congress should let the tax credit expansion expire at the end of the year as scheduled. This will save taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars and encourage federal and state officials to pursue policy reforms that will truly make healthcare more affordable.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/adammillsap/2025/09/12/bidens-bigger-tax-credits-push-rising-healthcare-costs-onto-taxpayers/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

UK and US Seal $42 Billion Tech Pact Driving AI and Energy Future

UK and US Seal $42 Billion Tech Pact Driving AI and Energy Future

The post UK and US Seal $42 Billion Tech Pact Driving AI and Energy Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Highlights Microsoft and Google pledge billions as part of UK US tech partnership Nvidia to deploy 120,000 GPUs with British firm Nscale in Project Stargate Deal positions UK as an innovation hub rivaling global tech powers UK and US Seal $42 Billion Tech Pact Driving AI and Energy Future The UK and the US have signed a “Technological Prosperity Agreement” that paves the way for joint projects in artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and nuclear energy, according to Reuters. Donald Trump and King Charles review the guard of honour at Windsor Castle, 17 September 2025. Image: Kirsty Wigglesworth/Reuters The agreement was unveiled ahead of U.S. President Donald Trump’s second state visit to the UK, marking a historic moment in transatlantic technology cooperation. Billions Flow Into the UK Tech Sector As part of the deal, major American corporations pledged to invest $42 billion in the UK. Microsoft leads with a $30 billion investment to expand cloud and AI infrastructure, including the construction of a new supercomputer in Loughton. Nvidia will deploy 120,000 GPUs, including up to 60,000 Grace Blackwell Ultra chips—in partnership with the British company Nscale as part of Project Stargate. Google is contributing $6.8 billion to build a data center in Waltham Cross and expand DeepMind research. Other companies are joining as well. CoreWeave announced a $3.4 billion investment in data centers, while Salesforce, Scale AI, BlackRock, Oracle, and AWS confirmed additional investments ranging from hundreds of millions to several billion dollars. UK Positions Itself as a Global Innovation Hub British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the deal could impact millions of lives across the Atlantic. He stressed that the UK aims to position itself as an investment hub with lighter regulations than the European Union. Nvidia spokesman David Hogan noted the significance of the agreement, saying it would…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:22
Crucial Delay: How Lack of Data Could Impact Fed Policy Adjustments

Crucial Delay: How Lack of Data Could Impact Fed Policy Adjustments

BitcoinWorld Crucial Delay: How Lack of Data Could Impact Fed Policy Adjustments The financial world is abuzz following Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s recent remarks, which highlight a significant challenge facing the central bank’s future Fed policy adjustments. A lack of reliable economic data, particularly employment indicators, stemming from the government shutdown, could force the Fed to pump the brakes on its planned policy shifts. This situation introduces a layer of uncertainty for markets and investors alike, as the central bank relies heavily on comprehensive data to guide its decisions. What’s Driving the Uncertainty in Fed Policy Adjustments? Jerome Powell explicitly stated that the recent government shutdown created a void in critical economic reporting. Key employment indicators, consumer sentiment surveys, and other vital statistics that typically inform the Federal Reserve’s understanding of the economy simply weren’t available. Without this complete picture, making informed decisions about interest rates or other monetary tools becomes incredibly difficult. The Federal Reserve operates on a data-dependent framework. This means every decision regarding Fed policy adjustments, such as whether to raise, lower, or maintain interest rates, is meticulously weighed against the latest economic performance data. When this data stream is interrupted, the foundation for policy decisions weakens, leading to potential delays. Why Are Comprehensive Economic Data Crucial for Monetary Policy? Think of the economy as a complex machine, and economic data as the dashboard gauges. The Fed needs to see these gauges clearly – unemployment rates, inflation figures, GDP growth, and wage increases – to know if the machine is running too hot or too cold. Without accurate readings, it’s like driving blindfolded. For instance, employment data offers insights into labor market health, consumer spending power, and potential inflationary pressures. If the Fed can’t accurately assess these factors, it risks making an adjustment that could either stifle growth unnecessarily or allow inflation to accelerate unchecked. This underscores the profound importance of timely and accurate information for effective monetary policy adjustments. Potential Challenges and Implications for Future Fed Policy Adjustments This data gap presents several challenges: Market Volatility: Uncertainty about the Fed’s next move can lead to increased volatility in financial markets, impacting everything from stock prices to bond yields. Investor Confidence: A less predictable monetary policy environment can erode investor confidence, potentially affecting investment and growth. Delayed Decisions: The most direct impact is the potential for the Fed to slow the pace of its Fed policy adjustments. This could mean interest rate decisions are postponed or approached with greater caution. Economic Forecasting: Other economic forecasters and businesses also rely on this data, making their own planning more difficult. Powell himself acknowledged this, expressing a strong desire to have more comprehensive data available by December. This timeline suggests that the central bank is actively waiting for clarity before committing to its next steps. Looking Ahead: What Does This Mean for Future Fed Policy Adjustments? The immediate takeaway is patience. The Federal Reserve will likely adopt a more cautious stance, preferring to wait for a clearer economic picture before making any significant moves. This doesn’t necessarily mean a halt to all Fed policy adjustments, but rather a more deliberate and potentially slower approach. For individuals and businesses, this period calls for close attention to upcoming economic reports and statements from the Federal Reserve. Understanding the data the Fed is watching will be key to anticipating their next actions. The central bank’s commitment to data-driven decisions remains paramount, even when the data itself is temporarily elusive. In conclusion, Jerome Powell’s candid admission underscores the critical role of robust economic data in shaping monetary policy. The temporary void created by the government shutdown could indeed slow the pace of Fed policy adjustments, introducing a period of heightened caution and data dependency for the central bank. As we move forward, the availability of comprehensive economic indicators will be the guiding light for the Federal Reserve’s crucial decisions, influencing the stability and growth of the broader economy. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: Why is a lack of data so problematic for the Federal Reserve? The Federal Reserve relies on accurate and timely economic data to assess the health of the economy and make informed decisions about interest rates and other monetary tools. Without this data, their ability to make effective Fed policy adjustments is severely hampered, increasing the risk of missteps. Q2: What specific types of data are most important for the Fed? Key data points include employment indicators (like unemployment rates and job growth), inflation figures (Consumer Price Index), GDP growth, retail sales, and manufacturing output. These provide a comprehensive view of economic activity and inflationary pressures, guiding monetary policy adjustments. Q3: How might this delay in policy adjustments affect the average person? A delay in Fed policy adjustments could lead to increased market volatility, impacting investments and retirement savings. It might also prolong uncertainty about future interest rates, which can affect borrowing costs for mortgages, car loans, and credit cards. Q4: When does Jerome Powell expect to have sufficient data? Jerome Powell expressed hope that more comprehensive data would be available by December. This suggests that the central bank is anticipating a clearer economic picture towards the end of the year before making further Fed policy adjustments. Q5: Does this mean the Fed won’t make any policy changes until December? Not necessarily. It means the Fed will likely adopt a more cautious and deliberate approach to any Fed policy adjustments. While significant shifts might be postponed, the central bank will continue to monitor available information and could make minor adjustments if deemed necessary, albeit with greater prudence. Did you find this analysis helpful in understanding the complexities of monetary policy? Share this article with your network on social media to keep others informed about the critical factors influencing the Federal Reserve’s decisions! To learn more about the latest explore our article on key developments shaping global economic trends and their impact on future market stability. This post Crucial Delay: How Lack of Data Could Impact Fed Policy Adjustments first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/10/30 03:40