Tightening mail-in voting rules could wind up backfiring for its Republican backers, say lawmakers and experts who spoke to Bloomberg News.President Donald TrumpTightening mail-in voting rules could wind up backfiring for its Republican backers, say lawmakers and experts who spoke to Bloomberg News.President Donald Trump

Experts warn Trump push 'could backfire on the Republican Party'

2026/03/17 22:05
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Tightening mail-in voting rules could wind up backfiring for its Republican backers, say lawmakers and experts who spoke to Bloomberg News.

President Donald Trump has been pushing hard on new mail-in voting rules, even as his GOP colleagues worry that it will hurt them most. They fear the measure could eliminate legitimate registered voters who help carry elections and prefer that option.

Trump favors limiting mail-in ballots with only a few exceptions, claiming fraudulent voting led to his 2020 defeat by Joe Biden. His push is backing the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, or SAVE America Act (S. 1383; BGOV Bill Analysis). That would require voters to show documentary proof of citizenship to register.

About 64 percent of eligible voters participated in the 2024 presidential election and 46 percent for the 2022 midterms, according to the Pew Research Center. Of those, some 29 percent of voters cast ballots by mail in 2024, while nearly one-third did so in 2022, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Right now, the legislation doesn’t specifically limit voting by mail. But attaching restrictions on mail-in voting is anticipated when the bill comes up in the Senate this week, Bloomberg reports. Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) is among those seeking an amendment to get “rid of this mass mail-in balloting scam,” as he terms it, with some allowances for military and elderly voters.

Bloomberg cites research that claims vote-by-mail laws don’t consistently favor one party over the other.

“Once they started mail-in voting, people just loved it,” Utah state Rep. Christine Watkins (R), who represents a rural district in the state, said to Bloomberg. “I know federal law trumps us—no pun intended—but people here wouldn’t like” getting rid of mail voting.

Several red states have also introduced bills tightening voting by mail rules. The Voting Rights Lab reports 43 restrictive bills have been proposed across 19 states this year.

Both parties are closely watching how changes to mail-voting rules could affect turnout in key districts, Bloomberg reports.

“Mail ballots can be the difference between winning and losing,” Matt Wylie, a GOP strategist based in South Carolina, said to the wire service. “If voters who normally cast ballots by mail have to show up on Election Day instead, fewer Republicans will. You risk losing seats you shouldn’t lose by going to war with something that can be a valuable tool.”

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said earlier this month that he plans to add “good amendments along the way” to SAVE America.

Thune claimed “ballot harvesting” is the “real threat,” referring to the practice of collecting and submitting ballots on behalf of other voters.

“As a general rule, if people are requesting ballots, and they’ve got legitimate reasons for requesting them, I think a lot of states use that process and use it pretty well,” Thune said.

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$3,697
$3,697$3,697
-0,13%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Solana Sees $10M Capital Rotation, Eyes $100 Breakout

Solana Sees $10M Capital Rotation, Eyes $100 Breakout

The post Solana Sees $10M Capital Rotation, Eyes $100 Breakout appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Capital rotation into Solana accelerated this week as traders
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/18 00:18
ZKsync Powers Tokenized Deposits in Major U.S. Bank Network

ZKsync Powers Tokenized Deposits in Major U.S. Bank Network

Key Takeaways: Five U.S. regional banks are building a tokenized deposit network on ZKsync. Deposits remain FDIC-insured bank liabilities, not stablecoins. The
Share
Crypto Ninjas2026/03/18 00:41