The post OP Weekly Analysis Feb 28 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. OP closed the week with a 12.62% drop, continuing the main downtrend, approaching the criticalThe post OP Weekly Analysis Feb 28 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. OP closed the week with a 12.62% drop, continuing the main downtrend, approaching the critical

OP Weekly Analysis Feb 28

OP closed the week with a 12.62% drop, continuing the main downtrend, approaching the critical $0.1100 support level and entering the oversold zone with RSI 21. Although the market structure indicates a distribution phase, if this level holds, short-term accumulation signals may form; however, Bitcoin’s bearish momentum necessitates a cautious approach for altcoins.

OP in the Weekly Market Summary

OP token traded in the $0.11 – $0.13 range last week, experiencing a sharp 12.62% drop and stabilizing at the $0.11 level. Volume profile remained at $104.53M, indicating continued selling pressure. The main trend is downward, with trading below EMA20 ($0.15). MACD gives a bearish signal with a negative histogram, while RSI at 21.06 is in oversold territory – this could prepare the ground for a potential reaction rally but remains risky until the trend structure breaks. In the bigger picture, the overall weakness in the crypto market and rising Bitcoin dominance reinforce the distribution phase in altcoins like OP. For position traders, the fate of $0.1100 will be the week’s main theme; if it holds, the upside target could extend to $0.2080, while a breakdown puts deeper corrections on the agenda. Check spot data for OP detailed spot analysis.

Trend Structure and Market Phases

Long-Term Trend Analysis

On long-term charts, OP is moving within a down channel that began from the peaks at the end of 2025 (around $0.2432). On the weekly timeframe, the lower highs and lower lows structure is clear: consecutive bearish candles over the last three weeks preserve the trend’s strength. The Supertrend indicator is signaling bearish, and the price is well below the 200-week EMA ($0.18). From a market cycle perspective, OP appears to have entered the distribution phase after the 2024-2025 bull run; however, assuming the crypto supercycle continues, this could be an accumulation base. As long as the main trend remains downward (until a break above $0.1285), short bias dominates. For portfolio managers, a return to $0.2432 is required for a long-term trend change – in the current setup, we recommend patience and selective entries.

Accumulation/Distribution Analysis

According to Wyckoff methodology, OP has transitioned from the markup phase to markdown in recent months; weekly volume spikes align with sales, indicating smart money distribution. However, around $0.1100, volume profile POC (Point of Control) formation and RSI divergence (price making new lows while RSI makes higher lows) resemble a potential spring/reaction low. Oversold levels (RSI<25) increase capitulation risk but also open a window for accumulation. Although distribution patterns dominate (head-and-shoulders-like structure at $0.16), a hold at $0.1100 could signal re-accumulation. Key to watch: Bounces without volume increase carry fake-out risk. In OP futures market data, funding rates are negative – short squeeze potential is low.

Multi-Timeframe Confluence

Daily Chart View

On the daily chart, OP is leaning on the $0.1100 major support (score 80/100). On 1D, there is 1 support/2 resistance confluence: Price is below EMA50 ($0.13), MACD histogram is narrowing. Oversold Stochastic crossover shows bullish divergence, but the trend filter is bearish. Short-term confluence: Daily remains bearish until break above $0.1285 resistance. Position traders can look for long opportunities on daily close above $0.115.

Weekly Chart View

On the weekly, 1 support/3 resistance is strong (total 9 levels confluence across 1D/3D/1W). Price is at the channel lower band ($0.11), 1W RSI at 21 in multi-year lows. Bearish engulfing candle dominated the week, but volume decline warns of reversal. Weekly Supertrend flip requires $0.1285. Long-term confluence supports the downtrend; wait for weekly doji or hammer for accumulation.

Critical Decision Points

Main support: $0.1100 (high volume node, psychological level – breakdown opens path to $0.09). First resistance: $0.1285 (EMA20/channel middle band). Second resistance: $0.16 (previous swing high). Upside target: $0.2080 (R:R 1:4 potential). Downside risk: Below $0.10 (score 22). Trend structure remains intact above $0.1100; acceleration expected below. Full list for OP and other analyses.

Weekly Strategy Recommendation

In Bullish Case

$0.1100 hold + daily close above $0.1285: Long positions entry around $0.115, stop below $0.1090. Target1: $0.16 (partial profit), Target2: $0.2080. R:R >1:3. RSI>40 and volume increase as confirmation. BTC above $64K supportive.

In Bearish Case

$0.1100 breakdown (daily close below): Short entry $0.1090, stop above $0.1120. Target: $0.10, then $0.09. R:R 1:2+. Aggressive short while no MACD negative divergence. Wait and see with weak altcoin rotation.

Bitcoin Correlation

OP is highly correlated with BTC (0.85+); BTC in downtrend at $63.5K with Supertrend bearish. If BTC supports at $62.5K/$60K break, OP accelerates below $0.11. BTC recovery above $64.3K triggers OP $0.13 test. Rising dominance fuels altcoin sales – monitor BTC leadership.

Conclusion: Key Points for Next Week

Next week, $0.1100 close and BTC movements are critical; hold brings RSI bounce, breakdown deep correction. Follow volume and multi-TF confluences. Position traders focus on risk management – be selective in macro weakness.

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Trading Analyst: Emily Watson

Short-term trading strategies expert

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/op-technical-analysis-february-28-2026-weekly-strategy

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Morgan Stanley Files For Bank Charter To Offer Crypto Custody And Staking Services — Report

Morgan Stanley Files For Bank Charter To Offer Crypto Custody And Staking Services — Report

The post Morgan Stanley Files For Bank Charter To Offer Crypto Custody And Staking Services — Report appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Morgan Stanley
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/28 19:18
Trump Announces Major U.S. Combat Operations in Iran to Counter “Imminent Threats”

Trump Announces Major U.S. Combat Operations in Iran to Counter “Imminent Threats”

Trump Announces Major U.S. Combat Operations in Iran, Citing Imminent Threats President Donald Trump announced that the United States has begun what he descri
Share
Hokanews2026/02/28 19:06
Michigan Bitcoin Bill: A Pivotal Step Towards State Crypto Reserves

Michigan Bitcoin Bill: A Pivotal Step Towards State Crypto Reserves

BitcoinWorld Michigan Bitcoin Bill: A Pivotal Step Towards State Crypto Reserves A truly transformative development is unfolding in the heart of the Midwest, capturing the keen attention of cryptocurrency enthusiasts, financial strategists, and policymakers alike. The proposed Michigan Bitcoin bill, officially designated as House Bill 4087 (HB 4087), has successfully cleared its second reading in the Michigan House of Representatives. This pivotal legislative move, if enacted, would grant the state government the unprecedented authority to allocate a significant portion of its budget—specifically up to 10%—into digital assets such as Bitcoin. This advancement marks a potential paradigm shift in how states approach treasury management and investment strategies, positioning Michigan at the forefront of innovative financial policy within the United States. Understanding the Scope of the Michigan Bitcoin Bill (HB 4087) The journey of HB 4087 through the Michigan legislative process has garnered considerable interest. Following its successful second reading, the bill has now been referred to the influential Government Operations Committee for comprehensive review and detailed deliberation. This committee holds a critical responsibility in scrutinizing the practical implications, potential economic impacts, and any inherent challenges associated with such a groundbreaking financial proposal. At its core, this Michigan Bitcoin bill aims to empower the state with the flexibility to strategically diversify its investment portfolio, moving beyond traditional bonds and equities. The proposed 10% allocation limit for cryptocurrency investments suggests a balanced yet progressive approach. It acknowledges both the substantial potential rewards and the inherent volatility characteristic of the digital asset market. Cointelegraph, a respected cryptocurrency news outlet, was among the first to report on this significant progression, underscoring the accelerating mainstream interest in digital currencies among various state governments. Key Provision: Permits investment of up to 10% of the state’s budget in eligible cryptocurrencies. Legislative Status: Passed its second reading; currently under review by the Government Operations Committee. Core Objective: To strategically diversify state treasury investments. What Compels Michigan to Consider a Bitcoin Reserve? Michigan’s proactive exploration of a Bitcoin reserve bill is not an isolated event; rather, it reflects a growing, broader trend of institutional interest in digital assets. There are several compelling economic and strategic reasons why a state might consider such a forward-thinking move, ranging from enhancing economic diversification to strategically positioning itself in the rapidly evolving digital economy. One primary motivation is the potential for substantial returns on investment. Historically, Bitcoin has demonstrated periods of explosive growth, offering a powerful hedge against inflationary pressures and a viable pathway to potentially grow state reserves more rapidly than traditional, lower-yield investments. Furthermore, by openly embracing cryptocurrency, Michigan could significantly signal its commitment to technological innovation. This could, in turn, attract leading blockchain companies, tech startups, and highly skilled talent to the state, fostering a vibrant ecosystem for future economic development. States like Texas and cities like Miami have already begun exploring similar initiatives, recognizing the long-term benefits. Many financial experts suggest that including digital assets in a state’s comprehensive investment strategy could offer: Enhanced Portfolio Diversification: Reducing over-reliance on conventional asset classes. Inflationary Hedge: Bitcoin’s limited supply makes it an attractive asset during periods of economic uncertainty. Technological Leadership: Solidifying Michigan’s reputation as an innovation-friendly state. Stimulated Economic Growth: Attracting crypto and blockchain-related businesses. Navigating the Inherent Challenges of the Michigan Bitcoin Bill While the potential benefits of the Michigan Bitcoin bill are indeed compelling, the path to its successful implementation is undeniably fraught with inherent hurdles. Investing in the cryptocurrency market, particularly in assets like Bitcoin, comes with a unique set of risks that demand meticulous consideration, robust regulatory frameworks, and sophisticated risk management strategies. The most prominent challenge remains market volatility. Cryptocurrency prices are notoriously susceptible to dramatic fluctuations, which could lead to significant gains or, conversely, substantial losses for state funds within relatively short periods. Moreover, the global regulatory landscape for digital assets is still in its nascent stages and continues to evolve, creating an environment of uncertainty that needs careful navigation. The Government Operations Committee will undoubtedly be tasked with thoroughly examining these concerns, working to establish clear, comprehensive guidelines and stringent safeguards to protect the state’s financial interests. Additionally, ensuring the secure management and storage of digital assets is paramount, requiring specialized expertise, cutting-edge infrastructure, and continuous vigilance to prevent cyberattacks or potential loss. Therefore, the successful and responsible implementation of this pioneering legislation will critically depend on: Comprehensive Risk Management: Developing strategies to mitigate market volatility. Clear Regulatory Frameworks: Establishing unambiguous legal and operational guidelines for crypto investments. Advanced Security Measures: Implementing state-of-the-art protocols to protect digital assets. Public Transparency and Education: Ensuring clear communication and understanding among citizens. What’s the Next Step for Michigan’s Pioneering Crypto Legislation? The referral of the Michigan Bitcoin bill to the Government Operations Committee signifies a critical and deliberative phase in its legislative journey. It is expected that the committee will conduct extensive, in-depth hearings, gather expert testimonies from financial professionals and blockchain specialists, and meticulously consider potential amendments to further refine and strengthen the legislation. This rigorous process is absolutely essential to ensure the bill is comprehensive, addresses all conceivable concerns, and ultimately serves the best long-term financial interests of the state and its citizens. Should the bill successfully navigate the committee stage, it would then proceed to a full vote within the Michigan House of Representatives. If approved there, it would then advance to the Senate for their independent review and vote. Finally, if it garners approval from both chambers, the bill would be sent to the Governor for signature, officially becoming law. This multi-stage democratic process underscores the robust checks and balances in place, ensuring thorough scrutiny before any major policy shift. The ongoing discussions and decisions surrounding this landmark bill could indeed set a powerful precedent for other states across the nation that are considering similar innovative investment strategies. In conclusion, the significant advancement of the Michigan Bitcoin bill represents a truly momentous occasion in the evolving and dynamic relationship between state governments and digital currencies. By actively exploring the possibility of investing in Bitcoin, Michigan is not merely seeking new avenues for potential financial growth but is also boldly embracing the future of finance itself. While challenges and complexities undoubtedly exist, the proactive and forward-thinking steps taken by the Michigan House of Representatives unequivocally highlight a commendable willingness to innovate and adapt in an increasingly digital and interconnected world. This legislative journey will be closely watched by financial institutions and governments globally, potentially paving the way for other states to follow suit in exploring the vast and transformative potential of cryptocurrency reserves. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is HB 4087? A: HB 4087, or House Bill 4087, is a proposed Michigan Bitcoin bill that would permit the state government to invest a portion of its budget, specifically up to 10%, into cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. Q2: What does the Michigan Bitcoin bill propose? A: The bill proposes to allow the state of Michigan to diversify its treasury investments by including digital assets, with a cap of 10% of the state’s total budget allocated for such investments. Q3: What are the potential benefits of this bill for Michigan? A: Potential benefits include portfolio diversification, a hedge against inflation, attracting tech innovation and businesses to Michigan, and the possibility of higher returns on state investments. Q4: What are the main challenges associated with state investment in Bitcoin? A: Key challenges involve managing market volatility, navigating an evolving regulatory landscape, ensuring robust security measures for digital assets, and maintaining public transparency and understanding. Q5: What are the next steps for the Michigan Bitcoin bill? A: After passing its second reading, the bill has been sent to the Government Operations Committee for further review. If approved there, it will proceed to a full House vote, then the Senate, and finally to the Governor for signature to become law. Share This Insight Did you find this update on Michigan’s pioneering crypto legislation insightful? Share this article with your network on social media to spread awareness about the evolving landscape of state government and cryptocurrency. Your engagement helps us foster informed discussions about the future of finance! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin institutional adoption. This post Michigan Bitcoin Bill: A Pivotal Step Towards State Crypto Reserves first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/20 00:40