Regulators in Nevada have filed a lawsuit against Coinbase, aiming to stop the crypto exchange from offering prediction markets they claim violate state gamblingRegulators in Nevada have filed a lawsuit against Coinbase, aiming to stop the crypto exchange from offering prediction markets they claim violate state gambling

Nevada Sues Coinbase Over Unlicensed Prediction Markets

2026/02/04 21:34
4 min read

Regulators in Nevada have filed a lawsuit against Coinbase, aiming to stop the crypto exchange from offering prediction markets they claim violate state gambling laws.

Key Takeaways

  • Nevada Gaming Control Board filed a civil enforcement action against Coinbase for offering unlicensed sports wagering through prediction markets.
  • Regulators argue the contracts constitute gambling, not federally regulated derivatives, and seek an injunction to halt operations.
  • Coinbase launched prediction markets via Kalshi, a federally regulated exchange, but states like Nevada are asserting their own legal authority.
  • The lawsuit follows similar enforcement actions against platforms like Polymarket and broader state-level crackdowns across the US.

What Happened?

Nevada’s gaming regulator has taken Coinbase to court over the company’s newly launched prediction markets, accusing it of operating an unlicensed sports betting platform. Although Coinbase partnered with Kalshi, a federally regulated platform overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Nevada insists these event contracts fall under state gambling rules.

The legal dispute deepens a growing clash between state-level gambling laws and federal oversight of crypto-related derivatives.

The Nevada Gaming Control Board filed a civil enforcement complaint on Monday in the First Judicial District Court in Carson City, naming Coinbase Financial Markets as the defendant. The board requested a temporary restraining order, a preliminary injunction, and permanent relief to block Coinbase from offering what it calls illegal gambling services to Nevada residents.

Regulators say the prediction contracts available through Coinbase, including those related to sporting events and elections, require a state-issued gaming license. According to a Feb. 3 press release, the board “has deemed Coinbase’s operations to be unlawful in Nevada.”

Board Chairman Mike Dreitzer said in a statement:

The Board takes seriously its obligation to operate a thriving gaming industry and to protect Nevada citizens. The action taken yesterday reinforces this obligation.

Officials also raised concerns about age compliance, noting that Coinbase permits users as young as 18, while Nevada gambling law restricts participation to those 21 and older.

Federal vs. State Jurisdiction: A Regulatory Standoff

Coinbase introduced prediction markets nationwide last month through Kalshi, a CFTC-regulated designated contract market. Users can buy and sell yes/no contracts on real-world events directly through the Coinbase app. While Kalshi’s contracts are treated as financial derivatives under federal law, Nevada regulators argue these are effectively sports bets and election wagers, and thus fall under state gaming rules.

Coinbase counters that prediction markets are a federally regulated product, and on December 19, it filed lawsuits against regulators in Michigan, Illinois, and Connecticut. The exchange contends that allowing individual states to apply conflicting rules “undermines national market consistency.

Not Just Coinbase: Polymarket and Others Also Targeted

Coinbase is not alone in facing scrutiny. Nevada courts recently granted a 14-day restraining order against Polymarket operator Blockratize, barring the decentralized prediction platform from offering contracts to residents. Regulators said the platform posed an “immediate” and “irreparable” risk to the integrity of Nevada’s betting environment, including consumer protection and underage gambling safeguards.

In both the Coinbase and Polymarket cases, Nevada courts rejected arguments that federal commodities law preempts state gambling statutes. The rulings suggest that even if an event contract is federally regulated, states may still enforce local gaming laws, especially where consumer risk is concerned.

Similar state-level actions have occurred elsewhere. Tennessee regulators recently ordered Kalshi, Polymarket, and Crypto.com’s North American Derivatives Exchange to halt sports contracts and void existing bets, citing concerns over unlicensed gambling and age verification.

CoinLaw’s Takeaway

I find this story fascinating because it highlights how state and federal laws are on a collision course when it comes to modern financial products like prediction markets. In my experience watching the evolution of crypto and fintech regulation, this kind of legal tug-of-war is exactly what stifles innovation while confusing the public. Coinbase’s move to offer prediction markets through a federally approved partner like Kalshi might seem compliant on the surface, but states like Nevada are making it clear they won’t be sidelined.

The bigger takeaway here is that crypto companies can no longer assume federal approval shields them from state-level enforcement. Until there’s more legal clarity, we’re going to see a lot more courtroom battles and regulatory patchwork. And in the meantime, platforms like Coinbase are caught in the middle.

The post Nevada Sues Coinbase Over Unlicensed Prediction Markets appeared first on CoinLaw.

Market Opportunity
LETSTOP Logo
LETSTOP Price(STOP)
$0.01823
$0.01823$0.01823
-0.27%
USD
LETSTOP (STOP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

The post United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page. If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet. FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted. The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:20
CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October

CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October

The post CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. CME Group is preparing to launch options on SOL and XRP futures next month, giving traders new ways to manage exposure to the two assets.  The contracts are set to go live on October 13, pending regulatory approval, and will come in both standard and micro sizes with expiries offered daily, monthly and quarterly. The new listings mark a major step for CME, which first brought bitcoin futures to market in 2017 and added ether contracts in 2021. Solana and XRP futures have quickly gained traction since their debut earlier this year. CME says more than 540,000 Solana contracts (worth about $22.3 billion), and 370,000 XRP contracts (worth $16.2 billion), have already been traded. Both products hit record trading activity and open interest in August. Market makers including Cumberland and FalconX plan to support the new contracts, arguing that institutional investors want hedging tools beyond bitcoin and ether. CME’s move also highlights the growing demand for regulated ways to access a broader set of digital assets. The launch, which still needs the green light from regulators, follows the end of XRP’s years-long legal fight with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. A federal court ruling in 2023 found that institutional sales of XRP violated securities laws, but programmatic exchange sales did not. The case officially closed in August 2025 after Ripple agreed to pay a $125 million fine, removing one of the biggest uncertainties hanging over the token. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication. Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/cme-group-solana-xrp-futures
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:55