The post INJ Technical Analysis Feb 1 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. INJ’s 24-hour trading volume reached 67.68 million dollars, while volume participationThe post INJ Technical Analysis Feb 1 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. INJ’s 24-hour trading volume reached 67.68 million dollars, while volume participation

INJ Technical Analysis Feb 1

4 min read

INJ’s 24-hour trading volume reached 67.68 million dollars, while volume participation in the downtrend remains limited, and combined with oversold RSI, it gives hidden accumulation signals. Market participants show weakness in volume despite selling pressure, signaling potential base formation.

Volume Profile and Market Participation

INJ’s current price is trading around 3.52 dollars, with 24-hour trading volume recorded at 67.68 million dollars. This volume is positioned at a medium level compared to recent weekly averages, but the lack of volume increase despite a 3% loss in the downtrend is noteworthy. Volume profile analysis detects a total of 6 strong levels across 1D, 3D, and 1W timeframes: 1 support/1 resistance on 1D, 1 support on 3D, and 1 support/3 resistance on 1W. This distribution indicates that supports are more dominant in the short term.

From a market participation perspective, volume during the downtrend generally stays below levels seen in up moves. While a healthy downtrend expects volume increase, the limited volume on down moves in INJ implies weakening seller strength. In the volume profile, Value Area High (VAH) is around 3.91, and Value Area Low (VAL) is near 3.17. As price approaches VAL, volume shrinkage exhibits a pattern supporting base testing. With low participation rates, institutional monitoring tendency prevails over retail panic selling. This is confirmed by narrowing bars in the volume histogram – no spike in the last 24 hours, just stability.

Accumulation or Distribution?

Accumulation Signals

Accumulation phase signals are particularly evident with volume divergence at oversold RSI levels like 26.92. As price erodes below EMA20 (4.43), volume decreases on down moves, forming the ‘drying up volume’ pattern. This shows strong hands (institutional) waiting for buying opportunities instead of selling. MTF volume levels supporting 1D and 3D supports (3.17) align with the Wyckoff accumulation schema. Recent weeks’ low-volume consolidation has shifted POC (Point of Control) around 3.50, holding the price. If volume increases above VAL, accumulation confirmation will follow.

Educational note: In accumulation, volume weakens rather than confirming price declines; INJ is showing exactly this scenario, preparing the ground for potential reversal.

Distribution Risks

Distribution warnings depend on potential volume spikes with Supertrend bearish (resistance 4.60) and negative MACD histogram. If there’s a volume explosion testing 3.91 resistance, the distribution cap could break. 3 resistance levels on 1W signal sellers preparing on higher timeframes. Current 67M volume could lead to bearish target 1.63 if volume increases on down moves. However, no volume confirmation yet, risk remains low.

Price-Volume Harmony

Price action shows a 3% decline in the downtrend, with obvious lack of volume confirmation. High volume on down candles is essential for a healthy bear move, but INJ dominates with volume divergence: volume shrinks as price makes new lows. This reflects seller exhaustion per the ‘volume does not lie’ principle. Combined with oversold RSI, price-volume divergence creates bullish divergence. There’s price pressure below EMAs, but downside without volume spikes increases fakeout risk. Key levels: If support 3.17 (74/100 score) holds with volume, harmony turns positive; if resistance 3.91 (65/100) breaks, expect volume spike.

Educational perspective: Price alone can be misleading, volume confirmation is essential. INJ’s lack of volume on downside signals trend reversal.

Big Player Activity

Institutional activity patterns are visible through long-tailed wicks and POC stabilization in the volume profile. Whale footprints are limited in 67M volume, but clustering exists at MTF supports – high volume at 1W support. Institutional accumulation is usually low-profile; INJ’s volume at key levels (3.17) fits this profile. For distribution, volume cliffs are expected at resistances (4.60), not yet present. INJ Spot Analysis and INJ Futures Analysis data also show spot-futures volume parity, low manipulation.

Never definitive: Big players stay hidden, but patterns should be monitored.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC at 77,650 level with 4.24% decline in downtrend, Supertrend bearish. Altcoins like INJ are highly correlated to BTC (%0.85+); if BTC supports 75,720-64,655 break, INJ tests 3.17. If BTC recovers above resistance 78,198, INJ eyes bullish target 5.49. Dominance increase crushes alts; current BTC caution suppresses INJ volume. Watch: Below BTC 75K adds selling for INJ, above 78K brings relief.

Volume-Based Outlook

Volume-based outlook: Short-term bearish bias but accumulation favored by volume divergence. Long if 3.17 support holds with volume, short on spike above 67M. Bull target 5.49 low score (30), bear 1.63 (22). Volume story: Participation weak, accumulation potential high – watch price but let volume lead. Overall, oversold + low volume down = reversal setup.

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Strategy Analyst: David Kim

Macro market analysis and portfolio management

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/inj-technical-analysis-february-1-2026-volume-and-accumulation

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

The post United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page. If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet. FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted. The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:20
CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October

CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October

The post CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. CME Group is preparing to launch options on SOL and XRP futures next month, giving traders new ways to manage exposure to the two assets.  The contracts are set to go live on October 13, pending regulatory approval, and will come in both standard and micro sizes with expiries offered daily, monthly and quarterly. The new listings mark a major step for CME, which first brought bitcoin futures to market in 2017 and added ether contracts in 2021. Solana and XRP futures have quickly gained traction since their debut earlier this year. CME says more than 540,000 Solana contracts (worth about $22.3 billion), and 370,000 XRP contracts (worth $16.2 billion), have already been traded. Both products hit record trading activity and open interest in August. Market makers including Cumberland and FalconX plan to support the new contracts, arguing that institutional investors want hedging tools beyond bitcoin and ether. CME’s move also highlights the growing demand for regulated ways to access a broader set of digital assets. The launch, which still needs the green light from regulators, follows the end of XRP’s years-long legal fight with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. A federal court ruling in 2023 found that institutional sales of XRP violated securities laws, but programmatic exchange sales did not. The case officially closed in August 2025 after Ripple agreed to pay a $125 million fine, removing one of the biggest uncertainties hanging over the token. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication. Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/cme-group-solana-xrp-futures
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:55