The post 6 Best Altcoins For Cross-Border Payments: DigiTap Emerges Over XRP & XLM appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Cross-border payments are big business and are on track to rise over 50% by 2030, hitting $290 trillion. Crypto has a natural advantage over banks, as it can move money instantly in seconds for fractions of a cent, compared to several days with fees averaging 6.2%.But what are the best altcoins for cross-border payments in …The post 6 Best Altcoins For Cross-Border Payments: DigiTap Emerges Over XRP & XLM appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Cross-border payments are big business and are on track to rise over 50% by 2030, hitting $290 trillion. Crypto has a natural advantage over banks, as it can move money instantly in seconds for fractions of a cent, compared to several days with fees averaging 6.2%.But what are the best altcoins for cross-border payments in …

6 Best Altcoins For Cross-Border Payments: DigiTap Emerges Over XRP & XLM

2025/09/19 21:30
XRP Millionaire Says Below $3 May Be the Last Chance to Buy Ripple

The post 6 Best Altcoins For Cross-Border Payments: DigiTap Emerges Over XRP & XLM appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Cross-border payments are big business and are on track to rise over 50% by 2030, hitting $290 trillion. Crypto has a natural advantage over banks, as it can move money instantly in seconds for fractions of a cent, compared to several days with fees averaging 6.2%.

But what are the best altcoins for cross-border payments in 2025? The tokens on this list all have real use cases, huge adoption potential, and the ability to shift the world toward real-time, borderless money. 

1. Digitap ($TAP)

Digitap ($TAP) is still in its presale and has quickly emerged as a leading contender in the cross-border race. Digitap is delivering an omni-bank app that unifies crypto and fiat into one seamless platform. Users can spend anywhere Visa is accepted, link their cards to Apple Pay or Google Pay, and even generate unlimited, no-KYC virtual cards for anonymous transactions.

It leverages AI to optimize routing, ensuring that users’ funds are always sent on the most cost-effective rails. From a single interface, users now have access to hundreds of cryptos and fiat currencies. 

The $TAP token powers this ecosystem. It has a fixed supply of 2 billion and deflationary mechanics linked to platform growth through a revenue buyback and burn scheme. Presale momentum has been overwhelmingly strong, with over $110,000 already raised. And with the $TAP at just $0.0125, the upside is huge for early adopters.

Digitap stands out because its product is already live today on iOS, Android, and desktop. 

digitap

2. Ripple (XRP)

Ripple has been a leader in cross-border payments for nearly a decade. The XRP token is central to the company’s global payments solution that partners with financial institutions to provide instant liquidity and settlement. XRP is fast and cheap, with transaction costs often less than a penny, making it an easy choice for institutional-grade settlement.

digitap

Despite its strengths, XRP’s price has struggled, and with a market cap of over $184 billion, the early upside is already gone. XRP is very much the incumbent with the most to lose to disruptors like Digitap in the race to transform cross-border payments. 

3. Stellar (XLM)

Stellar was designed specifically for remittances and financial inclusion. The Stellar network enables near-instant transfers of both fiat-backed stablecoins and digital assets, targeting underserved regions where traditional banking access is limited.

Similar to XRP, XLM already has a huge market cap and has failed to innovate and cause real disruption despite being live for years. 

4. Quant (QNT)

Quant takes a different approach to cross-border interoperability by focusing on connecting blockchains and financial systems through its Overledger Network. Rather than moving payments directly, QNT acts as a “bridge” layer, enabling banks, enterprises, and payment providers to connect to multiple blockchains via one standardized API.

5. Celo (CELO)

Celo is a mobile-first blockchain designed for peer-to-peer payments and remittances. Its goal is to make crypto accessible via smartphone, targeting users in emerging markets. CELO provides low-cost, mobile-native payments and has been much more successful than Stellar in driving adoption. 

The project has focused heavily on DeFi integrations, mobile UX, and grassroots adoption. CELO trades at roughly $0.30 with a market cap of $187 million, making it a mid-cap bet on emerging market financial access.

6. Hedera (HBAR)

Hedera Hashgraph is a high-speed distributed ledger that has carved out a niche in payments and enterprise settlement. With transaction speeds of 10,000+ transactions per second and fees measured in fractions of a cent, Hedera is one of the most scalable networks in the space.

Why Digitap Leads: Could it be the Best Crypto Investment of 2025?

While XRP and XLM paved the way for cross-border transactions, Digitap has captured investor imagination by combining a live product with aggressive improvements in user experience. The ability to spend crypto like cash via Visa, generate no-KYC cards instantly, and manage global accounts in one app gives Digitap a massive advantage and real-world application from day one.

With the presale already raising $110,000 and a current price of $0.01250, Digitap offers the most asymmetric upside. However, this price won’t last long with tiered price increases throughout the presale. 

Cross-border payments are a trillion-dollar market, and crypto is finally addressing the inefficiencies that banks have long ignored. While XRP and XLM remain important, Digitap’s combination of live product, Visa-backed card features, and presale momentum makes it the standout pick for 2025. For investors chasing both adoption and upside, $TAP is the altcoin to watch this year.

Digitap is Live NOW. Learn more about their project here:

Presale https://presale.Digitap.app  

Social: https://linktr.ee/Digitap.app 

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

I really like what Pavel mentioned about not using a mobile phone. Essentially, this is an "information fasting" approach to the challenges of information overload, contrasting with the "food fasting" that everyone loves using apps. One is metaphysical, the other is physical, but ultimately, both affect the mind and body, influencing hormones like cortisol. Now and in the future, attention is the scarcest resource. Being able to freely disconnect from electronic devices is a luxury, a freedom with its own barriers. Pavel is also an extreme craftsman. The advantage of being a craftsman is that you can lead a small team to create a killer app. However, the limitation is that Telegram, as the largest instant messaging software outside of China and the US, cannot become another Tencent platform. This same culture has also influenced its Web3 project, TON. By the way, let me talk about my close observation of TON over the past four years as the first Chinese institutional investor in the world. 1. The wrong technological path was taken. TON's stubborn insistence on using C++ seems like a kind of technological purist obsession. Historically, Russians have repeatedly taken the wrong turn on the "data technology tree": the Soviet Union failed to adapt to the transistor revolution, became obsessed with vacuum tube performance optimization, and missed the entire chip wave. They often overemphasize performance and control, but neglect the ecosystem and development experience. TON's SDK, toolchain, and documentation ecosystem lack standardization, making the development threshold too high; this is not a syntax problem, but a problem of lacking platform thinking. 2. Uneven ecological composition. Currently, it's basically only Russians and Chinese who are active, but resource allocation is clearly biased towards the Russian-speaking region. This is something everyone is already familiar with. 3. Oligopoly. Funding, traffic, and narrative resources within the ecosystem are concentrated on a few "top" companies/projects. Everyone knows they must curry favor with the "top" teams, but mid-tier projects are severely squeezed out. There is also a long-term power struggle between foundations and the oligopolistic "top" companies, resulting in constant internal friction. 4. Failure to accept oneself. Accepting and reconciling with oneself is crucial for any individual or organization. Only on this basis can you face yourself honestly and leverage your strengths while mitigating your weaknesses. However, TON seems obsessed with pitching to Musk, persuading American investors, and getting to the White House. The truth is, no matter how hard it tries, in the eyes of others, TON remains a public chain with a Russian background. In contrast, BNB didn't try to play the "American" role. Instead, it first became the most popular chain in the Eastern Time Zone, simultaneously creating a sense of FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) among Westerners, before smoothly expanding internationally—a much more effective approach. 5. The story of "adoption for 1 billion users" has been told for four years, and it's still just a story. Pavel keeps telling a grand story of "connecting Telegram's 1 billion users with the blockchain world," but this story has yet to truly materialize. The reason isn't that the vision is false, but rather structural constraints: In order to survive and ensure Pavel's personal safety (in recent years, Pavel has become increasingly obsessed with his physical safety, given several incidents, including the recent events in France), Telegram must maintain a "superficial" separation from TON to avoid crossing regulatory red lines; this separation prevents TON from ever truly integrating with Telegram's ecosystem. Even stablecoins like USDE have maintained a supply of only a few hundred million—indicating that the story is grand, but the reality is small. TON possesses the perfectionism of engineering geeks, yet lacks the warmth of ecological collaboration; it has a massive entry point, but is hampered by regulatory realities; it has its own advantages, but has not yet reconciled with itself. It has a narrative and ideals, but these need to be transformed into a sustainable balance of systems and incentives. I wish the TON ecosystem will continue to improve.
Share
PANews2025/10/30 14:00