The post Bitcoin: Is seller exhaustion behind BTC’s lack of real demand? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.   Bitcoin [BTC] sits at a macro-on-chain inflectionThe post Bitcoin: Is seller exhaustion behind BTC’s lack of real demand? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.   Bitcoin [BTC] sits at a macro-on-chain inflection

Bitcoin: Is seller exhaustion behind BTC’s lack of real demand?

3 min read

Bitcoin [BTC] sits at a macro-on-chain inflection point; seller exhaustion is visible, yet demand has not decisively reasserted itself.

Until exhaustion translates into sustained buyer conviction, apparent stability risks concealing deeper structural fragility beneath the surface.

Bitcoin continues to hold above Binance’s $62,000 reserve realized cost, a level untested since spot ETF approval, signaling that marginal sellers are largely exhausted.

Historically, this metric marked cycle bottoms, as seen near $42,000 pre-2024, reinforcing its structural relevance.

Source: CryptoQuant

Moreover, realized losses have flattened, indicating forced distribution has mostly cleared rather than accelerating further.

Consequently, downside pressure weakens as reactive selling fades.

But accumulation is not implied by exhaustion alone. Without a clear expansion in realized profits or fresh capital absorption, the market remains in equilibrium.

At this stage, this signifies stabilization rather than renewed demand leadership.

Bitcoin enters a wait-and-see risk regime

Bitcoin’s Options structure highlights a shift in how risk is priced, not a shift toward optimism.

Earlier on, a short-dated 25-delta skew pushed above 15%, indicating urgency to hedge the near-term downside.

However, as expected, catalysts failed to materialize, and realized volatility stayed muted while demand faded.

Source: Glassnode

As a result, short-term skew compressed sharply toward 4–5%, signaling that immediate fear has been repriced lower.

Crucially, longer-dated skews remain anchored near 7–9%. This persistence matters because it shows traders are not rotating bullish.

Instead, they are reducing expensive near-term insurance while keeping protection further out the curve.

As a result, caution eases into neutrality rather than confidence, reinforcing consolidation instead of trend continuation.

Decoding the absence of a sustained spot bid

Spot taker CVD reveals buyer hesitation beneath the headline price strength. Buyers do step in, as brief green surges show, yet these impulses fail to persist.

Instead, rallies fade quickly, flipping back to neutral or sell-dominant flow. As a result, demand appears reactive rather than anticipatory.

Even during advances toward the $90,000–$120,000 zone, cumulative buying lacks follow-through.

Source: CryptoQuant

This absence of a sustained spot bid confirms hesitation, not conviction. Meanwhile, leverage does not expand decisively.

Volatility remains episodic rather than trend-driven. This implies that risk appetite stays constrained.

Buyers defend levels when pressured, but they do not press advantage. The break fails because participation lacks aggression.

All this together, across on-chain cost bases, options positioning, and spot flow dynamics.

However, Bitcoin shows stabilization; without leadership, seller pressure has faded, risk is deferred, and demand remains reactive rather than conviction-led.


Final Thoughts

  • Seller exhaustion has stabilized Bitcoin above key cost bases, but without sustained spot demand or profit expansion, conviction remains absent and consolidation dominates.
  • Risk is being repriced rather than resolved, as defensive options positioning and reactive spot flows signal neutrality instead of renewed bullish leadership.
Next: RIVER just gave back half its 191% pump – Is the rally already over?

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/bitcoin-is-seller-exhaustion-behind-btcs-lack-of-real-demand/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19
Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Failed blockchain adoption narratives and weak fee capture have undercut confidence in major crypto projects.
Share
CryptoPotato2026/02/04 01:05