Introduction Regulators’ push to curb stablecoin yields under the CLARITY Act threatens to reroute capital away from fully regulated markets and toward offshoreIntroduction Regulators’ push to curb stablecoin yields under the CLARITY Act threatens to reroute capital away from fully regulated markets and toward offshore

CLARITY Act Could Ban Stablecoin Yields and Push Capital Offshore

Clarity Act Could Ban Stablecoin Yields And Push Capital Offshore

Introduction

Regulators’ push to curb stablecoin yields under the CLARITY Act threatens to reroute capital away from fully regulated markets and toward offshore or opaque financial structures. Industry executives warn that restricting compliant stablecoins from offering yields could sideline legitimate institutions while accelerating capital migration beyond U.S. oversight, complicating the country’s position in the global crypto ecosystem.

Key Takeaways

  • The CLARITY Act’s yield restrictions may drive compliant stablecoins offshore, undermining regulated financial channels.
  • Treating stablecoins strictly as cash rather than yield-bearing instruments creates incentives for capital to seek higher-yield opportunities outside the onshore framework.
  • Emerging on-chain yield strategies, including delta-neutral and synthetic structures, could flourish in regulatory gray areas, raising disclosure and oversight concerns.
  • Global competition is intensifying as other jurisdictions pursue yield-bearing digital instruments, potentially eroding U.S. competitiveness in crypto finance.

Tickers mentioned:

Sentiment: Bearish

Price impact: Negative. The proposed restrictions could depress onshore demand for compliant stablecoins and push yield-seeking capital abroad.

Trading idea (Not Financial Advice): Hold. Regulators’ actions create a watchlist for regulatory clarity and risk transfer to offshore structures.

Market context: The debate on stablecoin regulation sits at the intersection of monetary policy, banking capital, and crypto innovation, amid broader shifts toward yield-bearing digital assets worldwide.

Rewritten article body

The United States faces a pivotal choice as lawmakers weigh restrictions on stablecoin yields within the framework of the CLARITY Act. Industry participants contend that proposals to bar fully compliant stablecoins from offering interest could push a substantial amount of capital into offshore or opaque structures that operate outside conventional regulatory guardrails. Colin Butler, head of markets at Mega Matrix, argues that removing yield from compliant stablecoins would not fortify the American financial system; it would instead marginalize regulated institutions and redirect capital beyond U.S. oversight.

“There’s always going to be demand for yield,” Butler told Cointelegraph, noting that if compliant stablecoins cannot offer it, investors will gravitate toward offshore options or synthetic structures that fall outside the regulatory perimeter. The policy tension centers on balancing financial stability with the needs of market participants seeking efficient, regulated access to stable, dollar-denominated yields.

Under the GENIUS Act, payment stablecoins such as USDC must be fully backed by cash or short-term Treasuries and are prohibited from paying interest directly to holders. The framework treats stablecoins as digital cash rather than as traditional yield-bearing financial products. Butler maintains this creates a structural misalignment, especially when the three-month U.S. Treasury yields are hovering around 3.6% while ordinary savings accounts lag far behind.

He adds that the “competitive dynamic for banks isn’t stablecoins versus bank deposits,” but rather banks offering depositors only modest rates while banks retain the lion’s share of yields. If investors can earn 4% to 5% on stablecoin deposits via exchanges, compared with near-zero yields at traditional banks, capital reallocation appears rational—especially for yield-seeking institutions and individual investors alike.

Andrei Grachev, founding partner at Falcon Finance, warns that constraining onshore yield could create a vacuum that is rapidly filled by so‑called synthetic dollars—dollar-pegged instruments designed to maintain parity through structured trading strategies instead of one-to-one fiat reserves. “The real risk isn’t synthetics themselves—it’s unregulated synthetics operating without disclosure requirements,” Grachev said.

Butler pointed to Ethena’s USDe as a prominent example, noting that it generates yield through delta-neutral strategies involving crypto collateral and perpetual futures. Because such products fall outside the GENIUS Act’s definition of payment stablecoins, they occupy a regulatory gray area. “If Congress is trying to protect the banking system, they have inadvertently accelerated capital migration into structures that are largely offshore, less transparent, and completely outside U.S. regulatory jurisdiction,” he said.

Banks have argued that yield-bearing stablecoins could trigger deposit outflows and weaken their lending capacity. Grachev acknowledged that deposits are central to bank funding, but contended that portraying the issue as unfair competition misses a larger point. “Consumers already have access to money markets, T-bills, and high-yield savings accounts,” he noted, adding that stablecoins simply extend that access into crypto-native environments where traditional rails are less efficient.

Stablecoin yield bans could hurt US competitiveness

Beyond domestic concerns, the policy debate carries global implications. China’s digital yuan became interest-bearing earlier this year, and jurisdictions such as Singapore, Switzerland, and the UAE are actively developing frameworks for yield-bearing digital instruments. Butler warns that if the United States bans yield on compliant dollar stablecoins, it risks signaling to global capital that the U.S. offers only zero-yield coins, while other economies promote interest-bearing digital currencies—“a gift to Beijing,” he argued. Grachev argues the United States still has an opportunity to lead by establishing clear, auditable standards for compliant yield products. The current CLARITY Act draft, though, risks diluting this leadership by treating all yield as equivalent and failing to distinguish between transparent, regulated structures and opaque alternatives.

This article was originally published as CLARITY Act Could Ban Stablecoin Yields and Push Capital Offshore on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Three Must-Attend Side Events at Korea Blockchain Week 2025

Three Must-Attend Side Events at Korea Blockchain Week 2025

KBW 2025 is packed with 780+ side events, but Seoul Pulse by Neo, RWAfi.RAW by Pharos, and CafeGM by Spacecoin & GSR stand out as must-attend gatherings.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/19 22:20
Kraken's Big Hint: Pi Coin Set for Exchange Listing In 2026

Kraken's Big Hint: Pi Coin Set for Exchange Listing In 2026

Pi Coin (PI) is deeply embarked in the ongoing red light therapy that’s crunched the global crypto’s market capitalization below $2.4 trillion. The mobile mining
Share
Coinstats2026/02/07 09:25
Exploring Market Buzz: Unique Opportunities in Cryptocurrencies

Exploring Market Buzz: Unique Opportunities in Cryptocurrencies

In the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrencies, recent developments have sparked significant interest. A closer look at pricing forecasts for Cardano (ADA) and rumors surrounding a Solana (SOL) ETF, coupled with the emergence of a promising new entrant, Layer Brett, reveals a complex market dynamic. Cardano's Prospects: A Closer Look Cardano, a stalwart in the blockchain space, continues to hold its ground with its research-driven development strategy. The latest price predictions for ADA suggest potential gains, predicting a double or even quadruple increase in its valuation. Despite these optimistic forecasts, the allure of exponential gains drives traders toward more speculative ventures. The Buzz Around Solana ETF The potential introduction of a Solana ETF has the crypto community abuzz, potentially catapulting SOL prices to new heights. As investors await regulatory decisions, the impact of such an ETF on Solana's value could be substantial, potentially reaching up to $300. However, as with Cardano, the substantial market capitalization of Solana may temper its growth potential. Why Layer Brett is Gaining Traction Amidst established names, a new contender, Layer Brett, has started to capture the market's attention with its early presale stages. Offering a low entry price of just $0.0058 and promising over 700% in staking rewards, Layer Brett presents a tempting proposition for those looking to maximize returns. Comparative Analysis: ADA, SOL, and $LBRETT While both ADA and SOL offer stable investment choices with reliable growth, Layer Brett emerges as a high-risk, high-reward option that could potentially offer significantly higher returns due to its nascent market position and aggressive economic model. Initial presale pricing lets investors get in on the ground floor. Staking rewards currently exceed 690%, a persuasive incentive for early adopters. Backed by Ethereum's Layer 2 for enhanced transaction speed and reduced costs. A community-focused $1 million giveaway to further drive engagement and investor interest. Predicted by some analysts to offer up to 50x returns in coming years. Shifting Sands: Investor Movements As the crypto market landscape shifts, many investors, including those traditionally holding ADA and SOL, are beginning to diversify their portfolios by turning to high-potential opportunities like Layer Brett. The combination of strategic presale pricing and significant staking rewards is creating a momentum of its own. Act Fast: Time-Sensitive Opportunities As September progresses, opportunities to capitalize on these low entry points and high yield offerings from Layer Brett are likely to diminish. With increasing attention and funds being directed towards this new asset, the window to act is closing quickly. Invest in Layer Brett now to secure your position before the next price hike and staking rewards reduction. For more information, visit the Layer Brett website, join their Telegram group, or follow them on X by clicking the following links: Website Telegram X Disclaimer: This is a sponsored press release and is for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Bitzo, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 18:39