Paystack is transitioning into TSG, a holding company housing its different businesses, after hitting group profitability.Paystack is transitioning into TSG, a holding company housing its different businesses, after hitting group profitability.

Paystack restructures to holding company after hitting group profitability

Paystack, the Nigerian fintech acquired by Stripe, has restructured its operations under a new holding company, The Stack Group (TSG), which now houses Paystack, its consumer payments app Zap, Paystack Microfinance Bank (MFB), and a venture studio, signalling a more structured expansion beyond payments.

While Stripe’s $200 million acquisition made Paystack a wholly owned subsidiary, TSG introduces a different ownership model: it is jointly owned by Paystack’s chief executive officer, Shola Akinlade, Stripe, and existing Paystack employees known as Stacks. 

“The beauty of this model is that it rewards the people who are building the company, while also maintaining the global backing of one of the leading payments companies through this foundational partnership with Stripe,” said Amandine Lobelle, the chief operating officer of TSG, declining to share the breakdown of the cap table. 

The launch also coincides with group-wide profitability and positive monthly cash flow, after Paystack grew payment volumes more than 12x since the Stripe acquisition. “TSG signals a larger scope of ambition for us and sets the tone for the next decade of our company,” said Akinlade.

The restructuring continues a shift that has been underway within Paystack for the past year. With the launch of Zap and Paystack MFB, the decade-old company has slowly expanded beyond processing payments for businesses to consumer payments and banking, pursuing greater control over the funds it processes and new revenue streams.

TSG formalises this expansion by separating Paystack’s merchant payment business from its other new verticals, allowing the new verticals to compete in Nigeria’s tightly contested financial services market without diluting focus from Paystack’s core payments franchise, which remains the group’s primary revenue engine.

The TSG structure: Image Source: TSG.

Paystack can remain a pure merchant payments player, while Zap and Paystack MFB pursue their own roadmaps without confusing merchants, regulators, and partners, while still retaining some of Paystack’s goodwill. 

“What we realised is that we’re evolving from being a single-product company to a multi-brand technology group,” said Lobelle. “That means moving from payments alone to multiple brands and multiple types of technology, more of a group or conglomerate structure.”

The holding company structure also simplifies regulatory oversight as payments, banking, and consumer financial products carry different risk profiles and regulatory expectations. Housing them under a holdco allows licences, compliance, and risk to be separated by business line and geography. If Zap’s ₦250 million ($190,000) regulatory fine happened after TSG, the impact on TSG’s other businesses would be non-existent.

From Paystack Inc to TSG

Paystack launched in 2016 as a cheaper alternative to Nigeria’s existing online payment processors, and it quickly became one of the most important Nigerian startups ever after being the first to get into Y-Combinator, the world’s largest startup accelerator. 

Within four years, Paystack found product-market fit (PMF) in Nigeria and delivered one of the largest exits in Nigerian tech, selling to US payments giant Stripe for $200 million. The years that followed were spent scaling across the continent and deepening its payments infrastructure. Today, the company operates in seven African countries and offers a broad suite of payment products that now process trillions of naira monthly. 

A decade after it launched, the company’s profitability has given it the balance sheet strength to experiment beyond its core business without affecting Paystack’s unit economics, leading to initiatives like Paystack MFB, Zap, and TSG Labs, its venture studio focused on building new products using emerging technologies, both within and beyond fintech.

“We’re not moving away from financial technology,” said Lobelle about TSG Labs. “We’re expanding our scope. Emerging technologies could include AI or stablecoins. The mandate is to solve both fintech and non-fintech problems that are critical to Africa’s digital future and development.”

For now, the holding company will not impose leadership structures on individual businesses. Instead, each subsidiary will develop its own leadership based on its stage of maturity and operational needs.

“The Stack Group is designed to let each business operate with the level of autonomy and leadership it needs to succeed, while benefiting from shared governance, culture, and long-term direction at the group level,” Lobelle said. 

TSG also does not plan to transfer employees across subsidiaries in the near term. However, it will introduce an optional secondment programme that allows staff to work across different businesses when driven by business needs.

At the governance level, the holding company will have its own board, separate from those of its subsidiaries, continuing an existing practice of maintaining multiple boards across the group, in line with good governance standards and regulatory requirements.

Paystack joins a list of Nigerian tech companies like Moniepoint and Interswitch that have created holdco structures to reflect a multi-business ecosystem and create room for more businesses. These companies have since grown exponentially after becoming holdcos, as the structure makes it easier to acquire or build new companies and shut down experiments without damage to the flagship companies. 

Standing out

Despite entering consumer payments and banking markets crowded with well-funded incumbents that have spent nearly a decade shaping Nigerian consumer expectations, Paystack says it is unfazed by competition. Lobelle told TechCabal that the company does not frame competition as a zero-sum contest.

“You can think of competition as a finite game, us versus another player, or as an infinite game, where it’s us versus our ambition,” she said. “We operate with the mindset of an infinite game. The only real limits are our vision and the problems our merchants face. Competition changes over time. If we obsessed over it, we’d make short-term, myopic decisions.”

Paystack plans to leverage its decade-long experience working with African businesses, but its strength in one domain does not automatically translate to another. Scaling consumer-facing financial products requires a level of offline distribution that differs sharply from online payments, an area where Paystack’s track record is short. Beyond Paystack Terminal, which failed to replicate the company’s dominance in online payments, the company lacks a deep physical distribution network.

Whether Paystack’s parent group, TSG, can successfully execute these new bets remains uncertain. Still, its decision to split operations into distinct entities may help sharpen focus, while the moonshot projects incubated under TSG Labs could open new revenue streams over time.

“Having worked with thousands of businesses across the continent since 2016, it’s clear there are significant opportunities to support African companies beyond payments,” Akinlade said. “TSG gives us the structure to tackle those challenges more directly.”

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00
Zama to Conduct Sealed-Bid Dutch Auction Using Encryption Tech

Zama to Conduct Sealed-Bid Dutch Auction Using Encryption Tech

Zama unveils innovative public token auction, using proprietary encryption. Bidding begins January 21, 2026. Key details on protocol and market impact.Read more
Share
Coinstats2026/01/20 18:13
Fed Finally Cuts Interest Rates – Crypto Boom is About to Begin

Fed Finally Cuts Interest Rates – Crypto Boom is About to Begin

The federal funds rate now stands in a range of 4.00% to 4.25%, a level that reflects a delicate balancing […] The post Fed Finally Cuts Interest Rates – Crypto Boom is About to Begin appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 02:01