The post Believe founder Ben Pasternak accused of secretly dumping KLED tokens appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ben Pasternak, the Australian wunderkind whoThe post Believe founder Ben Pasternak accused of secretly dumping KLED tokens appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ben Pasternak, the Australian wunderkind who

Believe founder Ben Pasternak accused of secretly dumping KLED tokens

3 min read

Ben Pasternak, the Australian wunderkind who attempted to revive the concept of “internet capital markets” with his memecoin launchpad Believe has been accused of secretly dumping tokens tied to AI data firm Kled. 

Kled, which claims to pay users for their personal data, which is collected through data labelling tasks that can include uploading pictures and essays.

Once in possession of this data, it then hands it over to larger AI companies so that it can be used to improve datasets and help train AI software.

Pasternak had allegedly agreed with Kled CEO Avi Pastel that he wouldn’t sell his tokens on the open market and, if liquidity was ever needed, he was open to “OTC sales or burning supply.”

However, Pastel claimed on Tuesday that one day after Kled released its mobile app on September 24, Pasternak “OTC’d” the majority of his tokens to an undisclosed third party which then began selling them.

Ben Pasternak’s score on Ethos has also been taking a hit.

Read more: Burwick Law is coming for Internet Capital Markets

Pastel claims that, as a result of the sale, “We were forced into damage control, scrambling to coordinate OTC solutions to prevent further market harm.”

Pasternak claimed that the token sale was due to “taxes.” However, Pastel claims, “To this day, we do not know what this means,” and says Pasternak still hasn’t disclosed who the third party was

Pasternak allegedly kept breaking promises

Afterwards, Pasternak allegedly agree to then reneged on OTC pricing promises on four occasions, “while also lying about when he began selling.” 

As a result, the Kled team was “forced” to OTC his position at a $27 million valuation, reducing his holdings from “around 6% to roughly 3.5%.”

Pasternak then allegedly claimed that he wouldn’t offload the remainder of the tokens — until a week ago, when he apparently began selling again. 

“Once again, our whales had to scramble to organize OTC buys, reducing his position to roughly 1.7%,” Pastel said, adding, “Even then, he continued selling into the chart.”

He described Pasternak’s behavior as “unacceptable,” and claimed, “No builder should ever work with him again if that was not already clear.” 

Pasternak scrubs LinkedIn

Pasternak hasn’t responded to the allegations made on X, and hasn’t been active on the platform since October 20.

Last month, he announced an AI startup on LinkedIn, but now he appears to have scrubbed the LinkedIn account of all of its posts.

Believe provided a service where users could create a token on the back of an idea by simply tagging the app’s LaunchCoin account.

As part of its terms, Pastel says Pasternak was given a portion of token allocations that were created on the platform. However, Kled split from Believe in July and now retains all of its fees. 

Protos has reached out to Believe for comment and will update this piece should we hear back. 

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/believe-founder-ben-pasternak-accused-of-secretly-dumping-kled-tokens/

Market Opportunity
Believe Logo
Believe Price(BELIEVE)
$0.001364
$0.001364$0.001364
-3.26%
USD
Believe (BELIEVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Tom Lee’s BitMine Hits 7-Month Stock Low as Ethereum Paper Losses Reach $8 Billion

Tom Lee’s BitMine Hits 7-Month Stock Low as Ethereum Paper Losses Reach $8 Billion

The post Tom Lee’s BitMine Hits 7-Month Stock Low as Ethereum Paper Losses Reach $8 Billion appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Shares of BitMine Immersion
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/06 04:47
MYX Finance price surges again as funding rate points to a crash

MYX Finance price surges again as funding rate points to a crash

MYX Finance price went parabolic again as the recent short-squeeze resumed. However, the formation of a double-top pattern and the funding rate point to an eventual crash in the coming days. MYX Finance (MYX) came in the spotlight earlier this…
Share
Crypto.news2025/09/18 02:57
How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

The post How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 13: Participants hold signs in support of TikTok outside the U.S. Capitol Building on March 13, 2024 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) Getty Images From President Trump’s first ban attempt to a near-blackout earlier this year, TikTok’s five-year roller coaster ride looks like it’s finally slowing down now that Trump has unveiled a deal framework to keep the ByteDance app alive in the U.S. A look back at the saga around TikTok starting in 2020, however, shows just how close the app came to being shut out of the US – how it narrowly averted a ban and forced sale that found rare bipartisan backing in Washington. Recapping TikTok’s dramatic five-year battle When I interviewed Brendan Carr back in 2022, for example, the future FCC chairman was already certain at that point that TikTok’s days were numbered. For a litany of perceived sins — everything from the too-cozy relationship of the app’s parent company with China’s ruling regime to the app’s repeated floating of user privacy — Carr was already convinced, at least during his conversation with me, that: “The tide is going out on TikTok.” It was, in fact, one of the few issues that Washington lawmakers seemed to agree on. Even then-President Biden was on board, having resurrected Trump’s aborted TikTok ban from his first term and signed it into law. “It feels different now than it did two years ago at the end of the Trump administration, when concerns were first raised,” Carr told me then, in August of 2022. “I think, like a lot of things in the Trump era, people sort of picked sides on the issue based on the fact that it was Trump.” One thing led to another, though, and it looked like Carr was probably…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:29