Author: Frank, PANews Following the sharp decline in the cryptocurrency market on October 11th, the market appears to have entered a prolonged "cooling-off periodAuthor: Frank, PANews Following the sharp decline in the cryptocurrency market on October 11th, the market appears to have entered a prolonged "cooling-off period

Market Liquidity Survey: Amid Declining Liquidity, Retail Investors "Buy Lottery Tickets," While Major Investors "Purchase Insurance"

2025/12/15 17:16

Author: Frank, PANews

Following the sharp decline in the cryptocurrency market on October 11th, the market appears to have entered a prolonged "cooling-off period." For most investors, rather than predicting price movements, understanding the extent to which market liquidity has recovered after the devastating impact of 10.11 is perhaps more important. Furthermore, how do the dominant funds in the market view the future direction?

PANews attempted to analyze the current market capital landscape using data from several sources, including order book depth, the options market, and stablecoins. The final conclusion was that the market does not appear to have experienced a genuine recovery, but rather is trapped in a structurally divided state characterized by continuously declining liquidity and institutional funds accelerating their defensive posture.

Micro-liquidity: Fragile balance and disappearing support levels

To understand the current liquidity situation, the order depth difference is one of the most direct indicators.

Taking the depth chart of the Binance BTC/USDT perpetual trading pair as an example, it is clear that since October, the depth of the buy order book has become increasingly lower, dropping from a level generally above $200 million to the $100-200 million range. The depth of buy orders has also significantly decreased, remaining below $200 million.

Regarding the difference, the gap between long and short order depths has become significantly more balanced recently, with the order difference only around 10 million over several days since November. These data indicate that the market is currently in a state of relative equilibrium between long and short positions, but with continuously declining liquidity.

Regarding open interest, the overall open interest of altcoins (excluding BTC and ETH) did not show an increase as prices reached a low point; instead, it also declined. In contrast, the market also experienced a deep correction in April, but after prices reached a low point, the overall open interest in that market rebounded significantly (and this rebound even occurred before the price reached its lowest point).

Meanwhile, trading volume in the altcoin futures market is also shrinking, with no significant increase in volume expected due to bottom-fishing. These figures suggest that the altcoin market has entered a state of neglect.

Options Market: Retail Investors Buy Lottery Tickets, Major Players Bearish.

Another interesting statistic is the crypto options/crypto contract open interest ratio. Data shows that BTC's options ratio has surged this year, even exceeding 100% at its peak, and currently hovers around 90%. Prior to this, BTC's options ratio had long remained around 60%. This means the current BTC market has completely shifted from being dominated by futures contracts to being dominated by options contracts. However, ETH's crypto options/crypto contract open interest ratio has fallen to an extremely low level this year, at approximately 30%.

This data confirms two points. First, the BTC market is now completely dominated by institutions and hedge funds, while ETH and other altcoins no longer appear to be trading options for them. Second, and crucially, options market data is becoming increasingly important in predicting the BTC market. This trend is also evident in the total open interest of BTC options; even as prices fall, open interest remains high.

Therefore, option expiration dates and major pain points have become important reference indicators for the current BTC market. Looking at current data, the most recent significant option expiration date is December 26th. At this time, the total number of call options reached 192,000, while the total number of put options was only 74,200. However, the total value of these put options is as high as $508 million, while the total value of call options is only $71.25 million. This inverted data indicates that call options are currently very cheap (around $370), while put options are very expensive (reaching $6,800).

Looking at the distribution of option strike prices, we can see that most call options are priced above $100,000, making it highly unlikely that they will exercise on December 26th. Therefore, while these call options are numerous, they are more of a speculative "lottery ticket" investment. Conversely, a large number of put options have strike prices concentrated at $85,000 and below. Furthermore, the market capitalization of put options reached $1.124 billion, while the market capitalization of call options was only $373 million (the premiums paid by investors to purchase the options). In summary, although there are more bullish investors, the majority of funds (approximately 75%) are actually betting on a decline or defending against a decline.

Furthermore, the biggest pain point right now is the $100,000 mark. This also means that the $100,000 price level may become the focus of competition between option sellers and buyers this month. For market makers (option sellers), they are likely the main bulls in the current market, and if the price can be pushed to around $100,000, they will be the biggest winners.

However, for institutions that invest heavily in put options, they are mostly using options to hedge against the risk of a decline in the spot market. Although they are essentially bearish as a defensive choice, the fact that they still put funds into put options when the cost of a bearish position is high indicates that they are significantly pessimistic about the future market trend.

Stablecoins: Compliance withdrawal, speculative capital on the sidelines.

Besides options data and order book data, stablecoin data is also an important indicator for judging the current market liquidity and direction, especially the flow of stablecoins on exchanges. However, this data also reveals significant divergences in the market.

According to CryptoQuant data, USDT's stablecoin reserves on exchanges have been on an upward trend this year and have maintained this momentum recently. On December 4th, USDT's reserves on exchanges reached a record high of $60.4 billion, and are currently still hovering around $60 billion. As the main pricing benchmark for non-compliant exchanges, the continued growth of USDT's exchange reserves indicates that a large amount of speculative capital is still betting or preparing to buy at the bottom. Combined with the current decline in holdings, it suggests that a large amount of speculative capital is in a wait-and-see state.

USDC, however, presents a completely different picture. Starting in late November, a large amount of USDC was withdrawn from exchanges, with exchange reserves plummeting from $15 billion to around $9 billion, a drop of 40%. As a leading compliant stablecoin, USDC's main users are primarily US institutions and compliant funds. They represent the institutional faction in the market. Currently, it's clear that this group is accelerating its exit.

Judging from these two shifts, it seems the current market is dominated by retail investors and speculative capital waiting to buy at the bottom, while compliant institutions are retreating. This aligns with the earlier discussion of changes in the BTC options market. Of course, another possibility is that, given the downside risks in the market, a large amount of capital is shifting its cryptocurrency holdings to stablecoins for hedging.

In reality, there are far more data and indicators used to judge the market than those mentioned above, but overall, they almost all lead to similar conclusions. That is, the market has not truly recovered after the sharp drop on October 11th. What we are seeing is a market with scarce liquidity and significant disagreements between major players and retail investors. Retail investors and speculative funds are holding onto their shares and observing the market, while compliant institutions or major funds are accelerating their withdrawal from the spot market and building short-selling defenses by paying high premiums in the options market.

The current market doesn't seem to be at a bottom, poised for a breakout; rather, it appears to be a defensive battle with institutional investors leaving and speculative capital vying for position. At this juncture, focusing on whether the $85,000 institutional support level is breached is far more pragmatic than expecting a breakout above $100,000.

Market Opportunity
Major Logo
Major Price(MAJOR)
$0.11627
$0.11627$0.11627
+1.28%
USD
Major (MAJOR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41