The post $68M Bought, $130M Liquidated: Was Bitcoin’s $94K Spike a Manipulation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin surged from approximately $91,000 to over $94,000 within just two hours in the US trading hours on Tuesday, a move that caught many traders off guard. While some celebrated the sudden rally, others are raising red flags—calling it a textbook case of market manipulation. One of the most glaring concerns is the absence of any fundamental driver. Sponsored Sponsored No Catalyst in Sight, Yet Millions Flowed in Within Minutes Crypto trader Vivek Sen pointed out that there was no major news or announcements to justify the sudden price action. This lack of an identifiable catalyst has fueled speculation that the move was engineered rather than organic. On-chain analysts quickly identified unusual trading patterns. According to DeFi researcher DeFiTracer, market maker Wintermute purchased $68 million in Bitcoin in a single hour during the spike. Another analyst, DefiWimar, claimed multiple major players, including Coinbase, BitMEX, and Binance, made substantial coordinated purchases, describing the activity as coordinated manipulation. 🚨 BREAKING THE EXACT REASON WHY THE MARKET JUST PUMPED: WINTERMUTE BOUGHT 8,756 BTCCOINBASE BOUGHT 8,241 BTCBITMEX BOUGHT 7,610 BTCBINANCE BOUGHT 4,500 BTCBITWISE BOUGHT 3,857 BTCBITFINEX BOUGHT 3,003 BTC THIS WAS A COORDINATED MANIPULATION! pic.twitter.com/J9GZMfG6ku — Wimar.X (@DefiWimar) December 9, 2025 Veteran trader NoLimitGains offered a detailed breakdown of why the move appeared artificial. He noted several warning signs: thin order books that made it cheap to push prices higher, massive market buys clustered within minutes, and zero follow-through after the initial surge. He argued that real bull moves build structure while manipulated ones build traps. Traders on Both Sides Liquidated—A Classic Sign of Liquidity Hunting Perhaps the most compelling argument centers on what traders call “liquidity hunting.” It’s a strategy where large players deliberately push prices to trigger forced liquidations. Sponsored Sponsored When traders open leveraged positions, they set liquidation prices where their… The post $68M Bought, $130M Liquidated: Was Bitcoin’s $94K Spike a Manipulation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin surged from approximately $91,000 to over $94,000 within just two hours in the US trading hours on Tuesday, a move that caught many traders off guard. While some celebrated the sudden rally, others are raising red flags—calling it a textbook case of market manipulation. One of the most glaring concerns is the absence of any fundamental driver. Sponsored Sponsored No Catalyst in Sight, Yet Millions Flowed in Within Minutes Crypto trader Vivek Sen pointed out that there was no major news or announcements to justify the sudden price action. This lack of an identifiable catalyst has fueled speculation that the move was engineered rather than organic. On-chain analysts quickly identified unusual trading patterns. According to DeFi researcher DeFiTracer, market maker Wintermute purchased $68 million in Bitcoin in a single hour during the spike. Another analyst, DefiWimar, claimed multiple major players, including Coinbase, BitMEX, and Binance, made substantial coordinated purchases, describing the activity as coordinated manipulation. 🚨 BREAKING THE EXACT REASON WHY THE MARKET JUST PUMPED: WINTERMUTE BOUGHT 8,756 BTCCOINBASE BOUGHT 8,241 BTCBITMEX BOUGHT 7,610 BTCBINANCE BOUGHT 4,500 BTCBITWISE BOUGHT 3,857 BTCBITFINEX BOUGHT 3,003 BTC THIS WAS A COORDINATED MANIPULATION! pic.twitter.com/J9GZMfG6ku — Wimar.X (@DefiWimar) December 9, 2025 Veteran trader NoLimitGains offered a detailed breakdown of why the move appeared artificial. He noted several warning signs: thin order books that made it cheap to push prices higher, massive market buys clustered within minutes, and zero follow-through after the initial surge. He argued that real bull moves build structure while manipulated ones build traps. Traders on Both Sides Liquidated—A Classic Sign of Liquidity Hunting Perhaps the most compelling argument centers on what traders call “liquidity hunting.” It’s a strategy where large players deliberately push prices to trigger forced liquidations. Sponsored Sponsored When traders open leveraged positions, they set liquidation prices where their…

$68M Bought, $130M Liquidated: Was Bitcoin’s $94K Spike a Manipulation?

2025/12/10 08:22

Bitcoin surged from approximately $91,000 to over $94,000 within just two hours in the US trading hours on Tuesday, a move that caught many traders off guard. While some celebrated the sudden rally, others are raising red flags—calling it a textbook case of market manipulation.

One of the most glaring concerns is the absence of any fundamental driver.

Sponsored

Sponsored

No Catalyst in Sight, Yet Millions Flowed in Within Minutes

Crypto trader Vivek Sen pointed out that there was no major news or announcements to justify the sudden price action. This lack of an identifiable catalyst has fueled speculation that the move was engineered rather than organic.

On-chain analysts quickly identified unusual trading patterns. According to DeFi researcher DeFiTracer, market maker Wintermute purchased $68 million in Bitcoin in a single hour during the spike. Another analyst, DefiWimar, claimed multiple major players, including Coinbase, BitMEX, and Binance, made substantial coordinated purchases, describing the activity as coordinated manipulation.

Veteran trader NoLimitGains offered a detailed breakdown of why the move appeared artificial. He noted several warning signs: thin order books that made it cheap to push prices higher, massive market buys clustered within minutes, and zero follow-through after the initial surge. He argued that real bull moves build structure while manipulated ones build traps.

Traders on Both Sides Liquidated—A Classic Sign of Liquidity Hunting

Perhaps the most compelling argument centers on what traders call “liquidity hunting.” It’s a strategy where large players deliberately push prices to trigger forced liquidations.

Sponsored

Sponsored

When traders open leveraged positions, they set liquidation prices where their positions automatically close if the market moves against them. These liquidation levels cluster at predictable price points, creating pools of “liquidity” that sophisticated players can target. By pushing Bitcoin’s price sharply upward, large players can trigger a cascade of short liquidations—forcing bearish traders to buy back their positions at unfavorable prices. This forced buying adds fuel to the rally, allowing the manipulators to sell into the artificially inflated demand.

Trader Orbion highlighted this dynamic, noting that the day saw $70 million in long liquidations followed by $61 million in short liquidations—with both sides getting wiped out within hours.

NoLimitGains warned that historically, such vertical spikes tend to retrace sharply. With funding rates spiking and open interest climbing rapidly, the warning signs were clear. He suggested the setup points to larger players positioning to sell into retail excitement.

Not Everyone Is Convinced It Was Manipulation

However, not all analysts share the manipulation thesis. On-chain analyst Darkfost pointed to US employment data released around the same time as a legitimate catalyst. JOLTS job openings for October came in at 7.67 million—well above the 7.0 million forecast—while ADP weekly employment figures flipped positive after weeks of decline.

He noted that Bitcoin gained roughly 4% immediately after the data dropped. With the FOMC meeting approaching and a rate cut widely expected, Darkfost argued the macro backdrop provided genuine tailwinds for risk assets, suggesting the rally may have been driven by fundamentals rather than foul play.

As of 11:30 UTC, Bitcoin had retreated from its highs and was trading around $92,500.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/bitcoin-94k-spike-liquidity-hunt/

Market Opportunity
Talus Logo
Talus Price(US)
$0.01315
$0.01315$0.01315
-22.18%
USD
Talus (US) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41