The post Jupiter Exchange Amends Lending Risk Disclosure appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Jupiter Exchange acknowledges claims of “zero contagion risk” were inaccurate. Claims of vault security were previously promoted but later retracted. Community and competitors question the risk model’s integrity. Jupiter Exchange’s COO Kash Dhanda addressed inaccuracies about the ‘zero contagion risk’ in Jupiter Lend, acknowledging asset recollateralization issues, following community concerns and Kamino Finance’s criticism. This admission impacts trust and risk management in DeFi markets, highlighting lender competition and potential vulnerabilities in Solana’s ecosystem due to asset rehypothecation. Community Backlash and Competitive Repercussions Community reaction intensified after Jupiter Exchange deleted a controversial claim about their lending model, which originally promoted a “zero contagion risk.” Dhanda later clarified in a platform video that Jupiter Lend uses recollateralized assets, contradicting its initial marketing. Due to the revised claims, Solana’s Kamino Finance reacted by blocking Jupiter Lend’s migration tool, citing misleading risk model assertions. This highlights potential systematic risks posed by recollateralized assets, which may affect user trust and lending practices within the Solana ecosystem. Kamino’s actions sparked further debate in the Solana community, questioning the integrity of Jupiter Lend’s risk models. Kash Dhanda stated in a video, “These vaults are indeed isolated,” but admitted recollateralization exists, prompting varied industry responses regarding transparency standards. Kash Dhanda, COO, Jupiter, acknowledging the “zero contagion risk” claim: “This claim [zero contagion risk] … was inaccurate and that the protocol does rely on rehypothecation to boost yields.” Jupiter Token Drop and Regulatory Concerns Rise Did you know? The issue with Jupiter Lend’s recollateralization recalls historical parallel events in DeFi, where under-disclosed rehypothecation led to market disruptions, mirroring the wildcat banking era’s risks. As of December 7, 2025, the Jupiter (JUP) token saw its price at $0.23 and faced a 33.06% decline over the past 30 days, according to CoinMarketCap. The token holds a market cap of… The post Jupiter Exchange Amends Lending Risk Disclosure appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Jupiter Exchange acknowledges claims of “zero contagion risk” were inaccurate. Claims of vault security were previously promoted but later retracted. Community and competitors question the risk model’s integrity. Jupiter Exchange’s COO Kash Dhanda addressed inaccuracies about the ‘zero contagion risk’ in Jupiter Lend, acknowledging asset recollateralization issues, following community concerns and Kamino Finance’s criticism. This admission impacts trust and risk management in DeFi markets, highlighting lender competition and potential vulnerabilities in Solana’s ecosystem due to asset rehypothecation. Community Backlash and Competitive Repercussions Community reaction intensified after Jupiter Exchange deleted a controversial claim about their lending model, which originally promoted a “zero contagion risk.” Dhanda later clarified in a platform video that Jupiter Lend uses recollateralized assets, contradicting its initial marketing. Due to the revised claims, Solana’s Kamino Finance reacted by blocking Jupiter Lend’s migration tool, citing misleading risk model assertions. This highlights potential systematic risks posed by recollateralized assets, which may affect user trust and lending practices within the Solana ecosystem. Kamino’s actions sparked further debate in the Solana community, questioning the integrity of Jupiter Lend’s risk models. Kash Dhanda stated in a video, “These vaults are indeed isolated,” but admitted recollateralization exists, prompting varied industry responses regarding transparency standards. Kash Dhanda, COO, Jupiter, acknowledging the “zero contagion risk” claim: “This claim [zero contagion risk] … was inaccurate and that the protocol does rely on rehypothecation to boost yields.” Jupiter Token Drop and Regulatory Concerns Rise Did you know? The issue with Jupiter Lend’s recollateralization recalls historical parallel events in DeFi, where under-disclosed rehypothecation led to market disruptions, mirroring the wildcat banking era’s risks. As of December 7, 2025, the Jupiter (JUP) token saw its price at $0.23 and faced a 33.06% decline over the past 30 days, according to CoinMarketCap. The token holds a market cap of…

Jupiter Exchange Amends Lending Risk Disclosure

Key Points:
  • Jupiter Exchange acknowledges claims of “zero contagion risk” were inaccurate.
  • Claims of vault security were previously promoted but later retracted.
  • Community and competitors question the risk model’s integrity.

Jupiter Exchange’s COO Kash Dhanda addressed inaccuracies about the ‘zero contagion risk’ in Jupiter Lend, acknowledging asset recollateralization issues, following community concerns and Kamino Finance’s criticism.

This admission impacts trust and risk management in DeFi markets, highlighting lender competition and potential vulnerabilities in Solana’s ecosystem due to asset rehypothecation.

Community Backlash and Competitive Repercussions

Community reaction intensified after Jupiter Exchange deleted a controversial claim about their lending model, which originally promoted a “zero contagion risk.” Dhanda later clarified in a platform video that Jupiter Lend uses recollateralized assets, contradicting its initial marketing.

Due to the revised claims, Solana’s Kamino Finance reacted by blocking Jupiter Lend’s migration tool, citing misleading risk model assertions. This highlights potential systematic risks posed by recollateralized assets, which may affect user trust and lending practices within the Solana ecosystem.

Kamino’s actions sparked further debate in the Solana community, questioning the integrity of Jupiter Lend’s risk models. Kash Dhanda stated in a video, “These vaults are indeed isolated,” but admitted recollateralization exists, prompting varied industry responses regarding transparency standards.

Kash Dhanda, COO, Jupiter, acknowledging the “zero contagion risk” claim: “This claim [zero contagion risk] … was inaccurate and that the protocol does rely on rehypothecation to boost yields.”

Jupiter Token Drop and Regulatory Concerns Rise

Did you know? The issue with Jupiter Lend’s recollateralization recalls historical parallel events in DeFi, where under-disclosed rehypothecation led to market disruptions, mirroring the wildcat banking era’s risks.

As of December 7, 2025, the Jupiter (JUP) token saw its price at $0.23 and faced a 33.06% decline over the past 30 days, according to CoinMarketCap. The token holds a market cap of $712.88 million and a max supply of 7 billion. Trading volume fell by 37.38% in 24 hours, with CoinMarketCap data underpinning these figures.

Jupiter(JUP), daily chart, screenshot on CoinMarketCap at 00:30 UTC on December 7, 2025. Source: CoinMarketCap

Coincu research team highlights that regulatory scrutiny may increase as platforms reassess transparency in risk disclosures. As the Solana ecosystem evolves, protocols are expected to adapt security and risk management practices aligning with broader industry demands.

Source: https://coincu.com/news/jupiter-exchange-lending-risk-disclosure/

Market Opportunity
Intuition Logo
Intuition Price(TRUST)
$0.07491
$0.07491$0.07491
-3.11%
USD
Intuition (TRUST) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Pi Network (PI) Daily Market Analysis 22 February 2026

Pi Network (PI) Daily Market Analysis 22 February 2026

Pi Network's anniversary update – here's the latest: • Marked 1st mainnet anniversary on 20 February 2026, outlining next phase priorities • Key focuses: expanding
Share
Coinstats2026/02/22 12:24
Markets await Fed’s first 2025 cut, experts bet “this bull market is not even close to over”

Markets await Fed’s first 2025 cut, experts bet “this bull market is not even close to over”

Will the Fed’s first rate cut of 2025 fuel another leg higher for Bitcoin and equities, or does September’s history point to caution? First rate cut of 2025 set against a fragile backdrop The Federal Reserve is widely expected to…
Share
Crypto.news2025/09/18 00:27
Microsoft Corp. $MSFT blue box area offers a buying opportunity

Microsoft Corp. $MSFT blue box area offers a buying opportunity

The post Microsoft Corp. $MSFT blue box area offers a buying opportunity appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In today’s article, we’ll examine the recent performance of Microsoft Corp. ($MSFT) through the lens of Elliott Wave Theory. We’ll review how the rally from the April 07, 2025 low unfolded as a 5-wave impulse followed by a 3-swing correction (ABC) and discuss our forecast for the next move. Let’s dive into the structure and expectations for this stock. Five wave impulse structure + ABC + WXY correction $MSFT 8H Elliott Wave chart 9.04.2025 In the 8-hour Elliott Wave count from Sep 04, 2025, we saw that $MSFT completed a 5-wave impulsive cycle at red III. As expected, this initial wave prompted a pullback. We anticipated this pullback to unfold in 3 swings and find buyers in the equal legs area between $497.02 and $471.06 This setup aligns with a typical Elliott Wave correction pattern (ABC), in which the market pauses briefly before resuming its primary trend. $MSFT 8H Elliott Wave chart 7.14.2025 The update, 10 days later, shows the stock finding support from the equal legs area as predicted allowing traders to get risk free. The stock is expected to bounce towards 525 – 532 before deciding if the bounce is a connector or the next leg higher. A break into new ATHs will confirm the latter and can see it trade higher towards 570 – 593 area. Until then, traders should get risk free and protect their capital in case of a WXY double correction. Conclusion In conclusion, our Elliott Wave analysis of Microsoft Corp. ($MSFT) suggested that it remains supported against April 07, 2025 lows and bounce from the blue box area. In the meantime, keep an eye out for any corrective pullbacks that may offer entry opportunities. By applying Elliott Wave Theory, traders can better anticipate the structure of upcoming moves and enhance risk management in volatile markets. Source: https://www.fxstreet.com/news/microsoft-corp-msft-blue-box-area-offers-a-buying-opportunity-202509171323
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:50