TLDR MegaETH will refund all deposits from its USDm Pre-Deposit Bridge after operational failures during launch A misconfigured multisig transaction allowed early reopening, causing deposits to exceed $400 million unintentionally Technical issues included incorrect contract parameters, KYC provider rate limits, and timing control failures The $250 million cap was filled within minutes, locking out users [...] The post MegaETH’s $400 Million Stablecoin Launch Goes Wrong, All Funds Refunded appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR MegaETH will refund all deposits from its USDm Pre-Deposit Bridge after operational failures during launch A misconfigured multisig transaction allowed early reopening, causing deposits to exceed $400 million unintentionally Technical issues included incorrect contract parameters, KYC provider rate limits, and timing control failures The $250 million cap was filled within minutes, locking out users [...] The post MegaETH’s $400 Million Stablecoin Launch Goes Wrong, All Funds Refunded appeared first on CoinCentral.

MegaETH’s $400 Million Stablecoin Launch Goes Wrong, All Funds Refunded

2025/11/28 16:59

TLDR

  • MegaETH will refund all deposits from its USDm Pre-Deposit Bridge after operational failures during launch
  • A misconfigured multisig transaction allowed early reopening, causing deposits to exceed $400 million unintentionally
  • Technical issues included incorrect contract parameters, KYC provider rate limits, and timing control failures
  • The $250 million cap was filled within minutes, locking out users who relied on official communications
  • Refunds are pending smart contract audit, with a new USDC-USDm bridge planned before mainnet beta launch

MegaETH will return all funds deposited into its Pre-Deposit Bridge following a series of technical failures that disrupted the launch of its native stablecoin, USDm. The Ethereum Layer-2 project announced the decision Thursday on X, acknowledging what it called “sloppy execution” during the rollout.

The pre-deposit campaign opened Tuesday with a $250 million limit. Users immediately encountered problems when the deposit contract contained an incorrect SaleUUID parameter. This required an emergency multisig update to fix.

At the same time, Sonar, the KYC provider handling identity verification, applied strict rate limits that blocked many users from accessing the platform. The team needed more than 20 minutes to identify and resolve the issue.

Once the system came back online, deposits resumed at a randomized time. Users who were actively refreshing the page filled the entire $250 million cap within minutes. Those waiting for official announcements found themselves locked out completely.

MegaETH then decided to raise the deposit cap to $1 billion. This is where the most serious problem occurred.

During the process of increasing the cap, a multisignature transaction controlling the contract parameters was misconfigured. The transaction was set to require all four signatures instead of three out of four. Once the required signatures were collected, the transaction became executable by anyone.

An external party executed the queued transaction roughly 30 minutes before the bridge was scheduled to reopen. Deposits resumed earlier than planned and quickly surpassed $400 million.

The team attempted to contain the situation by reducing the cap to $400 million. Transaction speeds meant this effort failed as deposits continued flowing in. A second attempt to set the cap at $500 million also failed to stop the uncontrolled inflow.

MegaETH eventually suspended the entire process. The team scrapped plans to expand the limit to $1 billion and halted further deposits, citing unresolved bugs in the KYC system.

Technical Details Behind the Failure

The misconfigured multisig transaction created a critical vulnerability in the launch process. Safe multisig transactions become executable by any party once the required number of signatures is reached. MegaETH lost control over the timing of the cap increase as a result.

The team emphasized that no user funds were ever at risk during these events. All deposits remained secure in the smart contract throughout the process.

The KYC provider issues added to the chaos. Sonar’s rate limiting prevented legitimate users from completing deposits during the initial window. This created an unfair advantage for users who managed to bypass or avoid these restrictions.

What Happens Next

MegaETH will process refunds through a new smart contract currently under audit. The team did not provide a specific timeline for when refunds will begin, stating only that repayments will start shortly after the audit completes.

The project plans to reopen a conversion bridge between USDC and USDm before launching its Frontier mainnet. This beta phase will aim to establish stable liquidity under more controlled conditions. The team stated that depositor contributions will be recognized in the future but did not specify how.

MegaETH is designed as an Ethereum Layer-2 network targeting high-speed transactions. The project claims theoretical capacity of up to 100,000 transactions per second with sub-millisecond latency and fees below $0.01. Ethereum currently processes about 30 transactions per second.

The refund contract is under audit, with all deposits set to be returned to participants.

The post MegaETH’s $400 Million Stablecoin Launch Goes Wrong, All Funds Refunded appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
USD Mapped Token Logo
USD Mapped Token Price(USDM)
$0.9973
$0.9973$0.9973
-0.02%
USD
USD Mapped Token (USDM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41