On Oct. 20, 2025, Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s chief legal officer, took to X to urge the U.S. government to fight cryptocurrency-related crimes using blockchain. “When bad guys innovate in financial crime, good guys need innovation to keep pace,” said Grewal.…On Oct. 20, 2025, Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s chief legal officer, took to X to urge the U.S. government to fight cryptocurrency-related crimes using blockchain. “When bad guys innovate in financial crime, good guys need innovation to keep pace,” said Grewal.…

Coinbase CLO to Treasury: modernize AML with AI and blockchain

2025/10/22 03:22

On Oct. 20, 2025, Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s chief legal officer, took to X to urge the U.S. government to fight cryptocurrency-related crimes using blockchain. “When bad guys innovate in financial crime, good guys need innovation to keep pace,” said Grewal. He shared an open letter he penned on behalf of Coinbase, providing the government with recommendations on approaching crypto crime.

Summary
  • The letter is a response to the U.S. Treasury’s request for comment on “innovative methods to detect illicit activity involving digital assets.”
  • In a series of posts accompanying the open letter, Grewal outlined several policymaking directions aimed at enhancing AML practices through AI, zero-knowledge proofs, etc.
  • The letter itself proposes to amend the Bank Secrecy Act and set a number of guidelines aimed at modernizing identity verification rules.
  • It is not the first time that Grewal has given recommendations to the USG on how to treat the burgeoning crypto sector. In 2024-2025, Grewal was calling out Operation Choke Point 2.0, a practice halted by the Trump Administration in 2025.

Grewal’s message 

Paul Grewal released the letter to the U.S. Treasury on Oct. 17. He shared the link to it on Oct. 20, concluding an X thread. In X posts, Grewal gave the U.S. Treasury four recommendations. He urged the U.S. government to:

  • Facilitate responsible use of AI to improve AML compliance by companies under the Bank Secrecy Act. It includes transaction monitoring and suspicious activity reporting. Regulations should focus on governance and outcomes and move away from the one-size-fits-all model.
  • Create guidance that will define the way API-driven AML compliance technologies will be regulated. The guidance should include acceptable use cases, data privacy requirements, and interoperability standards.
  • Amend the Bank Secrecy Act to use zero-knowledge proofs and decentralized identification as part of customer identification practices.
  • Create guidance that would explicitly recognize and incentivize the use of blockchain-based methods for analysis as a more effective AML compliance tool.

In an introduction to these recommendations, Grewal emphasized that “good guys” (U.S. Treasury and Congress) should be as innovative as “bad guys” and can follow Grewal’s recommendations to “underscore [the] reality.”

What’s in the Coinbase letter?

In a 40-page letter, Grewal thanked the U.S. Treasury for the opportunity to propose some solutions for fighting crime associated with digital assets.

In an executive summary, Grewal noted that Treasury’s request for comments came when money-laundering schemes had become very sophisticated. Advanced technologies allow criminal transactions to move at high speed and in large volumes.

To fight this, Grewal proposed using blockchain and other innovative solutions to detect illicit activity and modernize the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 and the Bank Secrecy Act. Modernization entails deleting redundant and outdated provisions.

The letter gives recommendations on each of the Treasury requests’ topics.

Regarding the use of Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), Grewal wrote that the Treasury should facilitate the adoption of APIs through regulation. This would help financial institutions use them to maintain AML/CFT norms. The Treasury needs to issue guidance under the Bank Secrecy Act. APIs will allow institutions to get data from various blockchains and analytics platforms in a timely manner. API regulation should address problems such as lack of standardization and data quality issues.

Another topic is the use of artificial intelligence. According to Grewal, the Treasury should adopt responsible use of AI in AML compliance. He believes it will revolutionize the way law enforcement and institutions fight illicit activity. He believes AI will reduce false positives, enable real-time processing at scale, and free up resources needed for higher-risk activity.

As for digital identification, Grewal advocated for updating guidelines to ensure decentralized identification and zero-knowledge proofs are included in the approved identity verification process (“specifically through amending Financial Crimes Enforcement Network regulations or issuing guidance that authorizes these forms of digital identification as an acceptable form of non-documentary verification”). The new guidance should allow interoperability of identity ecosystems and reuse of identification data. Grewal emphasized that the existing Bank Secrecy Act’s customer identification policy is outdated and dangerous. Grewal recommends allowing some forms of non-documentary verification.

In the Blockchain Technology section, Grewal called on the Treasury to explicitly recognize and incentivize the use of on-chain data, as it would improve AML/CFT compliance practices. It will require amending the Bank Secrecy Act. Grewal stressed that facilitating blockchain AML compliance via native technologies will make compliance more accurate, efficient, and protective of user data.

The rest of the letter is dedicated to answering specific questions from the Treasury’s “Request for comment on innovative methods to detect illicit activity involving digital assets.” It outlines risks, inefficiencies in the current rules, and other specific problems.

Earlier, Paul Grewal was a prominent figure in shedding light on Operation Choke Point 2.0, an effort by FinCEN to force banks to deny services for clients using cryptocurrency. Grewal used FOIA to acquire documents containing evidence of such actions. Eventually, Operation Choke Point 2.0 was halted under the Trump Administration.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41