The post Ethereum Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin Redefines ZK and FHE Performance with ‘Efficiency Ratio’ Metric appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin is calling on developers in zero-knowledge proofs (ZK) and fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) to rethink how they measure performance. Right now, many developers focus on “operations per second,” but Vitalik says that doesn’t give the full picture. He suggests using an efficiency ratio instead, this shows how much slower a computation …The post Ethereum Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin Redefines ZK and FHE Performance with ‘Efficiency Ratio’ Metric appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin is calling on developers in zero-knowledge proofs (ZK) and fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) to rethink how they measure performance. Right now, many developers focus on “operations per second,” but Vitalik says that doesn’t give the full picture. He suggests using an efficiency ratio instead, this shows how much slower a computation …

Ethereum Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin Redefines ZK and FHE Performance with ‘Efficiency Ratio’ Metric

2025/10/18 20:01
Ethereum Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin Redefines ZK and FHE Performance with ‘Efficiency Ratio’ Metric

The post Ethereum Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin Redefines ZK and FHE Performance with ‘Efficiency Ratio’ Metric appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin is calling on developers in zero-knowledge proofs (ZK) and fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) to rethink how they measure performance. Right now, many developers focus on “operations per second,” but Vitalik says that doesn’t give the full picture. He suggests using an efficiency ratio instead, this shows how much slower a computation gets when it’s encrypted compared to running it normally.

Making Performance Clear

Vitalik explained on X that the efficiency ratio is easy to understand and helps developers see the real trade-offs. “You already know how long a raw computation takes, so you just multiply to get the encrypted time,” he said. This makes it more hardware-independent and practical.

He also noted that the ratio isn’t perfect, things like memory access, parallel processing, and SIMD operations can affect results. Still, he believes it’s a much better measure than just saying “we can do N operations per second,” which doesn’t tell you how efficient the encryption really is.

Experts Join the Conversation

Crypto analyst Wei Dai agreed with Vitalik and called this measurement kappa. Kappa shows the extra time needed to prove a computation cryptographically compared to running it normally. Vitalik predicted that in the future, many computations could have single-digit kappa, meaning encryption would add very little overhead. He said some operations, like Poseidon hashing, are already very efficient, which is important for quantum-resistant cryptography.

Crypto user, Lukas Helminger joined the discussion, asking how to benchmark FHE overhead for blockchain use cases, where the network and number of participants could affect performance. Vitalik clarified that FHE is mostly single-party, so the network matters little except when sending inputs or doing threshold decryption. Lukas said that for blockchain applications, assuming a small number of nodes is important, because large networks could slow things down. Vitalik added that threshold decryption should be measured using bandwidth and network latency, while raw runtime is more useful for real-world estimates.

  • Also Read :
  •   How Low Can Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP Prices Go? Key Targets Revealed
  •   ,

Ethereum’s Scaling Issues

Ethereum still faces challenges with efficiency. Every node currently verifies every block, which limits how much data each block can hold. Raising the gas limit could allow more transactions but also risks overloading validators, who have only a few seconds to process each block.

Meanwhile, Ethereum developer Dankrad Feist, who helped design the Danksharding system, has joined Tempo, a new Layer-1 blockchain project backed by Stripe and Paradigm. Feist is working on making networks faster and more efficient.

Why Metrics Matter

Vitalik’s push for clearer metrics is about helping developers make better decisions. By using efficiency ratios or kappa, developers can see the true cost of encryption, design faster apps, and help Ethereum scale in a balanced and reliable way. These simple measures could make a big difference in the future of crypto development.

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

bell icon Subscribe to News

FAQs

What is a zero-knowledge proof (ZK) in cryptocurrency?

A zero-knowledge proof is a cryptographic method that allows one party to prove to another that a statement is true, without revealing any information beyond the validity of the statement itself.

What is the “efficiency ratio” Vitalik Buterin is proposing?

It’s a measure comparing how much slower a computation runs when it’s encrypted versus running normally, giving a clearer picture of cryptographic performance than raw speed.

How could new performance metrics help Ethereum scale?

Clearer metrics like the efficiency ratio help developers optimize apps and layer-2 solutions, reducing the computational burden on the main Ethereum network for faster, cheaper transactions.

Market Opportunity
ZKsync Logo
ZKsync Price(ZK)
$0.02916
$0.02916$0.02916
-2.08%
USD
ZKsync (ZK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41