Lowe’s rape gang report  and Europe’s illegal immigration disaster

Europe has spent the better part of three decades deluding itself that diversity is a strength. A slogan that became so fashionable questioning it became treated not as a legitimate exercise of democratic inquiry but as a moral failing. Yet public policy, no matter how noble its intentions, must ultimately answer to reality.

Reality recently came in the form of Rupert Lowe’s recent Independent Rape Gang Inquiry. The report revisits one of the most disturbing scandals in modern British history: the systematic sexual exploitation of vulnerable young girls by organized grooming gangs and the repeated failure of public institutions to intervene effectively.

A British Member of Parliament, Rupert Lowe initiated his inquiry back in February. The resulting report estimates that at least 250,000 white British girls were groomed, raped, and that 95% of abusers were Pakistani Muslims. Grooming was done via drugs, alcohol, blackmail, and racial/religious abuse.

The report declares it a “catastrophic, decades-long institutional failure” for the UK and extensively focuses on how local authorities, the police, and social services allegedly ignored the abuse out of fear of being labeled racist or politically incorrect.

Among the most disturbing testimonies cited by Lowe was of one survivor quoted as “saying that she got pregnant. ‘I was raped by probably 600 or 700 different men.’

“Another one described violence involving a child: ‘They put a cigarette out on the baby’s face.’

“Yet another survivor recalled: ‘He took the bottle of Jack Daniels and he forced it up inside me. I was about 12 or 13.’

“A survivor alleges rape by ‘multiple police officers’ in different parts of the country. One survivor said that her Christian faith was mocked by her abusers. They allegedly said, ‘Where is your God now? Has your God forsaken you?’

“One survivor said: ‘Race DID play a part. Throughout my exploitation. The other girls I encountered or were abused alongside me, were almost all exclusively White.’ Another recalled seeing multiple girls being transported together: ‘It was all White Girls. In a van. I remember seeing 15-20 girls locked in dog cages’.” (“‘Put cigarette on face, raped by 600-700 different men..’: UK MP reveals disturbing grooming gang testimonies in Parliament,” WION, June 2026).

But the foregoing is essentially a description of a pattern that had been blackening Britain for years: in Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, Newcastle, Huddersfield.

In Rotherham, the inquiry led by Alexis Jay concluded that approximately 1,400 children were sexually exploited between 1997 and 2013. Victims described rape, trafficking, intimidation, and violence. Numerous reports were made to authorities. Yet decisive action was repeatedly delayed. In Rochdale, organized groups preyed upon vulnerable girls while local institutions struggled to respond. Telford produced allegations spanning decades, involving claims that abuse had become so widespread that it was effectively normalized within certain circles. Newcastle and Huddersfield generated further convictions involving organized networks that targeted young girls for sexual exploitation.

Most infuriating is what the Lowe Report describes as public authorities being frequently hesitant to discuss certain aspects of the offending patterns for fear of generating accusations of racism or inflaming social tensions.

This lines up with the 2016 Casey Review, where Dame Louise Casey examined social integration and opportunity in isolated and deprived communities. It highlighted significant levels of segregation and inequality, and accused public bodies of ignoring divisive religious and cultural practices out of a fear of being labeled racist.

The review criticized institutional reluctance to engage with uncomfortable facts and argued that public authorities had, at times, failed to pursue difficult questions with sufficient rigor. The broader implication was clear: a democracy cannot effectively address problems that it refuses to examine honestly.

The British experience is not occurring in isolation. Across Europe, similar debates have emerged regarding integration, social cohesion, and the limits of multicultural policy. France and Germany continue to wrestle with the consequences of large-scale migration over the past decade. Sweden presents a particularly striking example. For many years, it was regarded internationally as a model of progressive governance and successful social democracy. Yet Swedish politics is now dominated by debates over gang violence, integration, and public security.

And yet while Muslims are given privileged protection by the authorities, Christians are frequently viewed with suspicion or hostility by cultural and political elites.

For the Philippines, as it faces its own questions regarding migration, national identity, religious coexistence, foreign influence, and the regulation of public discourse, the broader lesson is for public policy to remain grounded in reality rather than ideology. Reality is indifferent to political liberalism and sooner or later every society must confront the consequences of its choices.

But for now, the words of political commentator Douglas Murray (“Things Worth Remembering: The Dangers of Multiculturalism,” January 2025) give comfort:

“The world has finally woken up this week to one of the biggest crimes in 21^st century Britain: the organized gang rape of thousands of white working-class girls, mainly at the hands of Muslim men of Pakistani origin.”

Jemy Gatdula is the dean of the UA&P Law School and is a Philippine Judicial Academy lecturer for constitutional philosophy and jurisprudence. The views expressed here are his own and not necessarily of the institutions to which he belongs.

https://www.facebook.com/jigatdula/

Twitter @jemygatdula