QQQ and SPY are two of the most widely followed U.S. ETFs, but they track different indexes.
Invesco QQQ
→ tracks the Nasdaq-100
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY)
→ tracks the S&P 500
The differences affect:
As of 2026:
| Feature | QQQ | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Index | Nasdaq-100 | S&P 500 |
| Index scope | 100 largest eligible Nasdaq non-financial companies | 500 leading U.S. companies |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.0945% |
| Technology concentration | Higher | Lower |
| Financial companies | Generally excluded by NDX eligibility | Included |
| Number of sectors | Multiple non-financial sectors | All 11 GICS sectors |
QQQ's 0.18% fee is published by Invesco, while State Street lists SPY's gross expense ratio at 0.0945%.
QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100.
The index is designed to represent 100 of the largest eligible non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq.
This produces significant exposure to:
SPY seeks to track the price and yield performance of the S&P 500.
S&P Dow Jones Indices says the S&P 500 includes 500 leading companies and covers approximately 80% of available U.S. market capitalization.
State Street describes the S&P 500 as a diversified large-cap index spanning all eleven GICS sectors.
This is one of the biggest differences.
Invesco reported that QQQ's average Technology weight in June 2026 was 67.29% under its reporting classification.
State Street's S&P 500 sector data showed Information Technology at approximately 36.83% as of July 27, 2026.
The exact percentages change, but the direction is clear:
QQQ has materially greater technology concentration than SPY.
Many major holdings overlap.
For example, both have significant exposure to companies such as:
State Street's July 2026 SPY data shows these companies among its largest holdings.
The difference is mainly how much weight each ETF assigns and which additional companies are included.
SPY includes companies across:
QQQ is much more concentrated in growth-oriented Nasdaq companies.
Therefore:
SPY is not “the opposite of technology.”
It simply has broader sector exposure.
The Nasdaq-100 is designed around non-financial companies.
SPY includes large financial institutions.
State Street's July 27 sector data showed financials at approximately 12.6% of the S&P 500.
This means banks and insurers can materially influence SPY while having far less direct impact on QQQ.
QQQ:
0.18%
SPY:
0.0945%
For a hypothetical $10,000 investment:
QQQ:
approximately $18 per year
SPY:
approximately $9.45 per year
before changes in asset value.
The difference is relatively small in absolute dollars but compounds over long periods.
Both have significant AI exposure because many of the world's largest AI-related companies are included in both indexes.
However, QQQ typically gives those technology and semiconductor businesses higher aggregate weighting.
This makes QQQ potentially more sensitive to:
SPY is broader by:
QQQ still spreads risk across many companies, but Invesco formally describes it as non-diversified for regulatory purposes and warns about concentration.
No.
In June 2026, QQQ lost approximately 0.14% at NAV, while the S&P 500 lost approximately 0.95%, meaning QQQ outperformed that month.
But individual months or historical periods do not guarantee future leadership.
QQQ can outperform when growth and technology lead.
SPY may outperform when:
lead the market.
QQQ may appeal to investors seeking:
SPY may appeal to investors seeking:
Yes, but there is substantial overlap.
Owning both does not simply create two completely different portfolios.
Because the largest technology companies are present in both, investors should check the resulting combined weights before assuming the combination greatly increases diversification.
QQQON is linked specifically to QQQ, not SPY.
The chain is:
Nasdaq-100 → QQQ → QQQON
For the underlying QQQ fundamentals, read What Is Invesco QQQ ETF?.
There is no universal answer. They provide different sector and growth exposures.
SPY currently has the lower expense ratio: 0.0945% versus QQQ's 0.18%.
QQQ.
Yes.
No.
No. QQQON is linked to QQQ.
Neither QQQ nor SPY guarantees profit. Both can experience substantial losses during equity-market downturns, and historical relative performance should not be treated as a forecast.

Summary NVDAON and QQQON can both benefit when large U.S. technology companies perform well. The similarity ends there. NVDAON is linked to one company: NVIDIA. QQQON is linked to the Invesco QQQ

Summary Invesco QQQ ETF (NASDAQ: QQQ) is an exchange-traded fund designed to track the Nasdaq-100 Index, which represents 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market.

Summary QQQON, styled by Ondo as QQQon, is a tokenized product designed to provide economic exposure linked to the Invesco QQQ ETF (NASDAQ: QQQ). The product structure has three important layers:

Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) is one of the world’s most widely used instruments for expressing a single, concentrated macro view: U.S. large-cap growth and innovation, as represented by the Nasdaq-100

I. Macro & Market Sentiment (Market Data) · BTC Price: $78,381 (24h +0.94%) · Funding Rate: +0.0073% · Fear & Greed Index: 75 (Greed) (Key Event Preview) · This Friday (September 5), the U.S. will

One of the long-term technological risks frequently discussed in relation to Bitcoin is the development of quantum computing. Bitcoin currently uses ECDSA and Schnorr to verify ownership of BTC.

SWIFT has moved its blockchain strategy from testing into live banking activity. Standard Chartered and HSBC completed the first live interbank cross-border transaction using the SWIFT blockchain ledg

Sberbank is preparing to push crypto assets deeper into traditional banking by expanding its secured-lending framework to Bitcoin, Ether and Tether’s USDT. The plan is significant because it treats ma

Summary NBISON and NVDAON sit in the same AI investment story, but at different places in the value chain. NVDAON is linked to NVIDIA. NVIDIA designs and sells accelerated computing platforms, network

Summary “Asset-light” can be a dangerous phrase in an industry filled with billion-dollar data centers. Nebius is not suddenly becoming a software company with no physical infrastructure. What changed

Summary The easiest way to understand Nebius Token Factory is to ask what Nebius does after it has built the GPU cluster. If the answer is only: “rent the GPU” then the business can eventually become

Summary For an AI cloud, GPUs are only useful after electricity arrives. That sounds obvious. In 2026, it has become one of the most important constraints in the entire AI infrastructure market. Nebiu