President Donald Trump may insist that he is winning the war in Iran, but a number of prominent commentators within his own party beg to differ — including one President Donald Trump may insist that he is winning the war in Iran, but a number of prominent commentators within his own party beg to differ — including one

Schmidt's scathing takedown: Trump's Iran war is reckless madness endangering Americans

2026/03/12 06:17
4분 읽기
이 콘텐츠에 대한 의견이나 우려 사항이 있으시면 crypto.news@mexc.com으로 연락주시기 바랍니다

President Donald Trump may insist that he is winning the war in Iran, but a number of prominent commentators within his own party beg to differ — including one who advised the last Republican president to lead America into a Middle Eastern quagmire.

“Trust is a rare commodity in our wretched times,” wrote Steve Schmidt, a Republican strategist and former adviser to President George W. Bush, in a Wednesday Substack post. “These are the days of corruption, self-dealing, incompetence and faithlessness to the Constitution.”

Schmidt used the epithet “tiny men and women” to refer to Trump, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, then claimed that none of them truly understand the magnitude of what they have done by invading Iran. He further asserted that they do not have a coherent concept of what “victory” looks like in this conflict.

“We deserve to know,” Schmidt wrote. “There is no plan. There is no strategy. There is only incoherence. There is only incompetence.” He singled out Hegseth for running the war with Dan Caine, who Schmidt described as “a highly political chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, who should never have been confirmed by the Senate for the job. The result is a disaster.”

Because the mullahs who run Iran define victory as “survival,” Schmidt condemned the war on the grounds that “Trump has already failed to topple them. Therefore, the reasons for the war change by the hour.”

Concluding that “we should all dissent,” Schmidt warned that “what Trump is doing will not be easily stopped. We are in a most uncertain hour, and every American should appreciate that we had best get out of it as fast as possible. Disaster lurks.”

Schmidt is not alone among conservatives in calling out Trump’s Iran war. The Bulwark’s Jonathan V. Last blasted Trump in a Wednesday editorial for seemingly believing unrealistic expectations about how they could succeed as established by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“The American military is now telling the New York Times that, far from collapsing, the Iranian regime is adapting to the Israeli–American onslaught and finding our weaknesses,” Last argued. Pointing out that Iran has long prepared for the type of war now being waged by America and Israel, Last asked “how is it possible that the people in charge of running America’s war—by which I mean the commander-in-chief and his secretary of defense—could have misunderestimated Iran so completely?”

In addition to questioning the soundness of Trump’s Iran war plan, conservatives are also claiming Trump lied to his voters by going to war at all.

“Well, it just seems so insane, based on what he ran on. I mean, this is why a lot of people feel betrayed, right?” conservative podcaster Joe Rogan said during the Tuesday episode of his podcast “The Joe Rogan Experience.” “He ran on, ‘No more wars,’ ‘End these stupid, senseless wars,’ and then we have one that we can’t even really clearly define why we did it.”

Joe Walsh, a former Republican congressman from Illinois who like Rogan once supported Trump, argued in February that Trump supporters who refuse to abandon the president despite his flip-flopping on war are like “cult” members.

“I thought you wanted him to end wars all over the world,” Walsh said. “You said you wanted him to end American entanglement in conflicts and wars around the world. America shouldn’t be involved in these wars, you said. That’s why you’re voting for Trump, you said.” Yet if they still back him despite his unprovoked wars against Venezuela and Iran, as well as his threatened wars against Greenland and Cuba, “what are we to think, MAGA, but that you are a cult?”

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
시장 기회
OFFICIAL TRUMP 로고
OFFICIAL TRUMP 가격(TRUMP)
$2.875
$2.875$2.875
-2.01%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) 실시간 가격 차트
면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, crypto.news@mexc.com으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.

추천 콘텐츠

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
공유하기
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Stablecoins firm as Mastercard enables stablecoin settlement

Stablecoins firm as Mastercard enables stablecoin settlement

The post Stablecoins firm as Mastercard enables stablecoin settlement appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. What Mastercard’s Crypto Partner Program is and how it
공유하기
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/12 10:44
South Africa launches HIV vaccine trial

South Africa launches HIV vaccine trial

South Africa HIV vaccine trial efforts are advancing after researchers launched the first locally developed HIV vaccine study on the continent.   South Africa expands
공유하기
Furtherafrica2026/03/12 09:30