Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin said that 2026 should be a turning point in restoring users’ digital sovereignty — not only in the blockchain space, but alsoEthereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin said that 2026 should be a turning point in restoring users’ digital sovereignty — not only in the blockchain space, but also

Vitalik Buterin: 2026 Will Be the Year of Restoring Digital Sovereignty

2026/01/23 16:29
  • Ethereum co-founder urged reducing reliance on centralized services and developing users’ digital sovereignty.
  • Buterin is convinced that 2026 should be a pivotal year for regaining control over data and computing.
  • Among the tools he uses are Fileverse, Signal, SimpleX, Session, OpenStreetMap, and more.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin said that 2026 should be a turning point in restoring users’ digital sovereignty — not only in the blockchain space, but also in the broader context of computing, communications, and data work. 

According to him, “2026 is the year we take back lost ground in computing self-sovereignty,” and this task goes far beyond the crypto industry.

Buterin said that back in 2025 he significantly revised the software stack he uses every day. In particular, he “almost completely switched to Fileverse” — an open-source solution for encrypted, decentralized documents — and also made Signal his primary messenger, moving away from Telegram. 

In addition, he installed SimpleX and Session as alternative tools for private communication.

In 2026, these changes continued, according to Buterin. He replaced Google Maps with OpenStreetMap and Organic Maps, calling the latter “the best mobile app” that is not only open, but also “privacy-preserving,” since it runs locally and reduces the number of services that know a user’s physical location. 

He also switched from Gmail to ProtonMail, noting that “though ultimately, the best thing is to use proper encrypted messengers outright.”

Buterin also paid significant attention to local large language models (LLMs). He noted that he is actively exploring the possibilities of running artificial intelligence (AI) locally, but acknowledged that the “last mile” of integration remains problematic. 

In his view, there are many powerful local models, including CPU-based and phone-compatible ones, but they lack convenient integration and a unified user interface. 

He noted that there is still no “good Google Translate equivalent” that works with local LLMs, as well as no solutions with a convenient user experience (UX) for transcription, audio input, or searching through personal documents. 

Separately, he emphasized that he does not want to keep Ollama running all the time due to high energy consumption.

At the same time, Buterin acknowledged significant progress in this area, noting that just a year ago “most of the local models did not yet exist.” Ideally, he believes, the ecosystem should move as far as possible toward local LLMs, using specialized improved models to compensate for the small number of parameters. 

For more resource-intensive scenarios, he suggested combining several approaches: paying for queries via ZK proofs, using trusted execution environments (TEE), locally filtering requests, and removing sensitive data before sending queries to large models. 

In the long term, he sees an extremely efficient fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) as the ideal solution.

In conclusion, Buterin stressed that “sending all your data to third party centralized services is unnecessary,” since the industry already has tools for a much more private approach. In his view, these tools should not only be developed, but also used much more actively.

As a reminder, Buterin emphasized the importance of prioritizing decentralized social networks and recalled his previous statements on the matter. Earlier, he said he intends to fully switch to decentralized social networks in 2026, criticizing crypto-social projects for a speculative tokenization model and calling for competition to be developed through a shared decentralized data layer and new communication formats.

면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, service@support.mexc.com으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.

추천 콘텐츠

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
공유하기
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Zaldy Co asks SC to halt graft reso

Zaldy Co asks SC to halt graft reso

FORMER Party-list Rep. Elizaldy “Zaldy” S. Co has filed a petition before the Supreme Court (SC) to halt an Ombudsman resolution that found probable cause to charge
공유하기
Bworldonline2026/01/29 21:08
FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

De Britse financiële waakhond, de FCA, komt in 2026 met nieuwe regels speciaal voor crypto bedrijven. Wat direct opvalt: de toezichthouder laat enkele klassieke financiële verplichtingen los om beter aan te sluiten op de snelle en grillige wereld van digitale activa. Tegelijkertijd wordt er extra nadruk gelegd op digitale beveiliging,... Het bericht FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt verscheen het eerst op Blockchain Stories.
공유하기
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:33