In contemporary societies, Internet connectivity has become an infrastructure as fundamental as it is invisible. However, this very centrality makes it one of the most powerful tools in the hands of governments seeking to reestablish control in crisis situations.
When authorities decide to cut off connectivity, they do not merely block communication between citizens, but directly target the beating heart of the economy: access to money.
A striking example of this dynamic is occurring in Iran, where, following mass protests, the government has imposed nationwide Internet blackouts.
The consequences are immediate and tangible: banks struggle to operate, payment applications cease to function, and exchange platforms disappear from users’ screens. In this scenario, the traditional financial system reveals all its fragility, showing how dependent it is on centralized and easily controllable infrastructures.
In a context where trust in institutions can falter at any moment and connectivity is far from guaranteed, bitcoin stands out for its resilience.
It’s not magic, but the result of targeted design: bitcoin is specifically created to operate in hostile environments, where rules can change suddenly and access to financial services is never a given.
Unlike traditional currencies, bitcoin does not reside on a central server, does not belong to a specific country, and does not depend on a bank identifier or the authorization of a payment service provider.
If you hold your private keys, the money continues to exist even in the absence of the Internet. The ownership of the funds cannot be revoked by any central authority, nor can it be frozen or canceled with a simple order.
This fundamental characteristic distinguishes bitcoin from the traditional financial system, making it a unique asset in its class.
One of the most remarkable aspects of bitcoin is its ability to continue operating even under extreme conditions. The blockchain of bitcoin is constantly broadcast via satellite thanks to the Blockstream Satellite service.
This system acts like a one-way radio that sends the entire transaction ledger directly from space. Anyone with basic equipment can thus stay synchronized with the network, even without a local Internet connection.
But that’s not all: transactions can be prepared and signed completely offline. Subsequently, the small amount of necessary data can be sent to the global network through alternative channels such as radio, mesh networks, or even SMS. This means that, even in the event of a total Internet blackout, it is possible to continue interacting with the bitcoin network, albeit with some limitations.
During periods of authoritarian repression, bitcoin shifts its focus from ease of payment to operational continuity. In scenarios like the Iranian one, most users, lacking satellite access, may be temporarily limited to merely holding their funds, without the ability to make new transactions.
However, the crucial aspect is that the system does not stop: funds are not frozen, balances are not erased, and the transaction ledger continues to evolve somewhere in the world, even if it is not always visible to everyone.
This resilience serves as a bulwark against forced disruptions and manipulations by authorities. The traditional financial system, on the other hand, collapses quickly under similar conditions: banks require functioning networks, payment infrastructures need authorizations, and accounts can be easily frozen when everything is centralized. When connectivity drops to near zero, the traditional system becomes paralyzed.
Under extreme pressure, bitcoin may face limitations, but it never completely stops. It does not claim to solve every problem related to authoritarian regimes, but it belongs to a category of assets designed for a world where rules can change overnight, institutions can fail, and connectivity can vanish.
The true strength of bitcoin is not measured in price charts, speculation, or daily use, but in the silent assurance that, even when everything shuts down, something essential continues to operate. Without the need for permissions, without a central switch to turn off, bitcoin remains operational, safeguarding users’ value and ownership discreetly and tirelessly.
In an era where political stability and trust in institutions are no longer guaranteed, bitcoin emerges as an alternative asset, capable of providing security and continuity even in the most extreme situations. Its existence does not rely on a centralized infrastructure, but on a global and distributed network that continues to operate silently, even when everything else comes to a halt.
The lesson from Iran and other countries where connectivity is used as a tool of control is clear: in a world where everything can be switched off with a button, bitcoin represents a store of value that knows no borders or top-down limits. And it is precisely in these moments of crisis that its true utility manifests in all its power.


