The post Revolut banking U.S. charter move signals de novo path appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a strategic step toward its global ambitions, Revolut bankingThe post Revolut banking U.S. charter move signals de novo path appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a strategic step toward its global ambitions, Revolut banking

Revolut banking U.S. charter move signals de novo path

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

In a strategic step toward its global ambitions, Revolut banking has taken a major regulatory leap in the United States by applying for a full bank charter.

Revolut seeks U.S. banking license to operate as full-service bank

U.K.-based fintech Revolut has formally applied for a U.S. banking license, a move that would allow the company to operate like a traditional bank in the world’s largest economy. The application, filed in 2024, would grant the firm direct access to key U.S. payment networks, including Fedwire and the Automated Clearing House, known as ACH. This would significantly reduce its reliance on intermediary partners.

Moreover, securing a U.S. bank charter would cement Revolut’s status as a regulated financial institution in a core market. The company aims to position itself as a global digital bank rather than a simple payments or money-transfer app. However, approval would subject the firm to stringent U.S. oversight and capital requirements.

From partnership model to direct banking presence

Today, Revolut offers accounts and payment services in the United States via a partnership with Lead Bank, a Kansas City-based institution. Through this arrangement, Revolut provides accounts and payment capabilities without holding its own U.S. banking charter. That said, the new license would enable Revolut to shift away from this dependence and become a direct participant in the U.S. banking system.

The planned charter could also allow Revolut to roll out new lending products in the country, including credit cards and personal loans. Moreover, regulators could authorize the firm to take insured deposits in its own name, expanding its revenue base beyond payment fees and foreign-exchange services.

Strategic pivot from acquisition to de novo charter

The U.S. license application follows Revolut’s decision in January to abandon plans to acquire an existing American bank. Instead, the company chose to pursue a so-called de novo banking license, which allows a new bank to launch from scratch under full regulatory review. This shift highlights management’s willingness to undergo a lengthier process in exchange for a tailor-made charter.

However, the de novo route typically involves rigorous scrutiny from U.S. banking supervisors. Regulators will assess the firm’s governance, risk controls and compliance capabilities, especially given its rapid growth and crypto-friendly profile. Moreover, any approval could come with conditions or phased permissions as authorities monitor operations.

Competitive landscape and comparison with crypto peers

The move comes shortly after crypto exchange Kraken secured a Federal Reserve “master account” for its banking arm. That direct Fed access gives Kraken entry to the central bank’s core payment system, setting a precedent for digital asset firms seeking deeper integration with traditional finance. In this context, Revolut’s U.S. ambitions underscore growing convergence between fintech, banking and crypto infrastructure.

Revolut banking ambitions in the United States mirror its broader strategy to become a one-stop platform for payments, savings, investing and digital assets. However, unlike a pure crypto exchange, the company is pursuing a universal-banking style footprint, blending app-based services with full regulatory licensing in major jurisdictions.

Regulatory milestones and valuation impact

Revolut has repeatedly described the U.S. market as central to its goal of building a global digital bank. Valued at about $75 billion, the firm could see a U.S. charter rank among its most significant regulatory milestones outside Europe. Moreover, a successful application may strengthen investor confidence in its long-term profitability and diversification plans.

The crypto-friendly firm already holds several bank licenses worldwide. It secured a restricted U.K. banking license in 2024, and it also operates under banking charters in other jurisdictions. However, it is still not recognized as a bank in every market where it offers services, leading to a patchwork of regulatory regimes and product availability.

Global footprint and future expansion

Revolut continues to expand its presence across multiple regions, blending its app-based model with local regulatory approvals. The U.S. license effort fits into this broader roadmap, which includes strengthening oversight, enhancing compliance and deepening access to domestic payment rails. That said, each jurisdiction’s regulatory regime could impose different obligations on the firm’s business model.

If approved, the American charter would likely replace its existing collaboration with Lead Bank over time, aligning U.S. operations with its more integrated set-ups in other countries. Moreover, direct access to networks like Fedwire and ACH could help the firm lower costs, improve transaction speed and compete more aggressively with established banks and fintech rivals.

In summary, Revolut’s U.S. banking license application marks a pivotal step in its push to become a fully regulated global digital bank, potentially reshaping its business model, regulatory profile and competitive standing in the American market.

Source: https://en.cryptonomist.ch/2026/03/05/revolut-banking-us-charter/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

SoFi taps BitGo to support distribution of its SoFiUSD stablecoin

SoFi taps BitGo to support distribution of its SoFiUSD stablecoin

The post SoFi taps BitGo to support distribution of its SoFiUSD stablecoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SoFi Technologies has selected BitGo Bank & Trust
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/06 01:50
The reality of today

The reality of today

It may take a long time to process and to reach the point of awakening. Then we discover what is important in life — the value of creating, giving, and contributing
Share
Bworldonline2026/03/06 00:02
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00