A new lawsuit has just alleged that  Coinbase directors, including CEO Brian Armstrong, avoided over $1 billion in losses by selling shares during the company’sA new lawsuit has just alleged that  Coinbase directors, including CEO Brian Armstrong, avoided over $1 billion in losses by selling shares during the company’s

Armstrong, Other Coinbase Execs Face Lawsuit Over Alleged Insider Trading

  • A new lawsuit has just alleged that  Coinbase directors, including CEO Brian Armstrong, avoided over $1 billion in losses by selling shares during the company’s 2021 direct listing.
  • Judge Kathaleen St. J. McCormick has just ruled that the lawsuit will proceed.
  • Coinbase board member Marc Andreessen is accused of offloading $118.7 million in stock through his venture firm, Andreessen Horowitz.

A legal battle involving Coinbase has just taken on another turn. A Delaware judge recently decided that a shareholder lawsuit against some of the exchange’s top executives can continue. 

This case is related to how years ago, leaders at the company allegedly used insider information to protect their own wealth, at the expense of investors.

The Coinbase Insider Trading Lawsuit

The legal battle dates back to April 2021, when the company first hit the public markets. 

Unlike most firms, it chose a direct listing, which is different from a traditional initial public offering. Existing shareholders could also sell their stock immediately and there were no lockup periods to stop them from exiting. 

The lawsuit claims that insiders took full advantage of this setup, and Shareholder Adam Grabski, who initially filed the original complaint, is demanding reparations. 

He alleged that directors sold more than $2.9 billion in stock and according to the filing, CEO Brian Armstrong sold roughly $291.8 million himself. 

Chief Operating Officer Emilie Choi and co-founder Fred Ehrsam also reportedly sold hundreds of millions in shares and the plaintiffs believe these leaders knew the stock was overvalued before the public found out.

Why the Judge Rejected the Dismissal Request

The company tried to end this case early, and formed a special litigation committee to investigate the claims. 

This committee spent ten months reviewing the stock sales and eventually cleared the directors of any wrongdoing. They argued that the sales were small and necessary for market liquidity. 

However, Judge McCormick found a problem with the committee itself.

One member of the committee, Gokul Rajaram, has deep ties to board member Marc Andreessen. For context, Andreessen is one of the accused individuals in the Coinbase lawsuit. 

Records show that Rajaram and Andreessen Horowitz participated in at least 50 financing rounds together since 2019 and the judge noted that these “thick ties” create a conflict of interest. 

She did not accuse anyone of acting in bad faith, but noted that the lack of total independence was enough to keep the case alive.

Record Sales and Dropping Valuations

The timing of the stock sales is also another point in this. When the company went public, shares started trading at $381. 

Just five weeks later, the price fell by more than 37%. This drop happened as the firm showed new details about its revenue. It also announced a deal that would dilute existing shares and by mid-May, billions of dollars in market value had vanished.

The lawsuit is pointing to an internal tax valuation that was much lower than the market price, and the plaintiffs argue that directors saw this data and decided to sell before the crash. 

While plaintiffs say that Marc Andreessen allegedly sold $118.7 million through his firm during this window, the defendants strongly deny these claims. 

They argued that the stock price simply follows the movement of Bitcoin, and they insist they were “bullish” on the company and only sold a tiny fraction of their holdings.

The post Armstrong, Other Coinbase Execs Face Lawsuit Over Alleged Insider Trading appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Zcash (ZEC) Price Prediction: ZEC Defends $300 Support as Bullish Structures and Privacy Narrative Return to Focus

Zcash (ZEC) Price Prediction: ZEC Defends $300 Support as Bullish Structures and Privacy Narrative Return to Focus

Zcash (ZEC) is holding above the crucial $300 support zone as price consolidates near $339, with traders watching key resistance levels and a potential bullish
Share
Brave New Coin2026/02/01 02:16
The 5000x Potential: BlockDAG Enters Its Final Hours at $0.0005 Before the Presale Ends

The 5000x Potential: BlockDAG Enters Its Final Hours at $0.0005 Before the Presale Ends

BlockDAG is one of the few projects offering a structured window rather than a surprise. The presale has already raised $452 million, and only hours remain to buy
Share
Techbullion2026/02/01 02:00
Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36