The post Arizona women sue over AI-generated sexual deepfakes appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Three Arizona women have sued several people and companies, allegingThe post Arizona women sue over AI-generated sexual deepfakes appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Three Arizona women have sued several people and companies, alleging

Arizona women sue over AI-generated sexual deepfakes

Three Arizona women have sued several people and companies, alleging that their images were taken off their social media pages and fed into artificial intelligence (AI) models to generate deepfakes of them. They claimed that the suspects involved used the models to generate their explicit images and profit from them.

The lawsuit filed at the Maricopa County Superior Court in Arizona targets an Instagram account that has posted multiple videos of women, advertising them as AI models to make money. The plaintiffs, whose names are being withheld for privacy reasons, noted that some of the AI-generated images were created using their social media photos without prior consent. One of the victims mentioned that she is now being looked at in a way that does not sit well with her, simply because of the circulating images.

Arizona women initiate lawsuit over AI-generated content

The lawsuit names three defendants from Maricopa County in Arizona, including Beau Schultz, the owner of the Instagram account. The lawsuit also names 50 other John Does and several companies that were allegedly created or used to run the business. The plaintiffs are being represented by Nick Brand of Donlon Group and Cristina Perez Hesano from Pere Law Group.

According to Brand, the defendants, who are likely from Arizona, created blueprints to teach other men and boys how to make these so-called AI influencers that are then nudified from fully clothed images. He added that the defendants use these generated deepfakes to set up a subscription-based pornographic website where they share erotic messages back and forth with customers. Brand noted that the issue looks wider than he had imagined before he was assigned the case.

In the Arizona lawsuit, the defendants instructed their customers to avoid using popular or well-known influencers and instead use micro-influencers to reduce the risk of legal troubles. “I can’t believe how naive I was to what women are suffering through as technology advances,” Brand said. According to one of the victims, only strict legislation can be used to prevent these ills and prevent more women from being targeted in similar schemes.

Payment platform denies wrongdoing

Another victim mentioned that the public should not be able to use artificial intelligence to wreak this much havoc, noting that those who use it are targeting someone’s sister, mother, friend, and co-worker. Meanwhile, one of the companies listed in the lawsuit, Phyziro, a payment processing platform, said the accusations are materially false. The company claimed that it is an Interactive Computer Service provider under § 47 U.S.C. 230.

“The company shall not be treated as the publisher, speaker, or author of any content or transaction generated by third-party users or autonomous agents. We further maintain no duty to monitor the specific downstream intent or illicit activities of users or users-of-users. The Member and Manager are immune from liability for ‘Asymmetric Knowledge’ events where AI agents, users, or users-of-users act outside of the Manager’s direct visibility or programming.”

The company mentioned that it only serves as a provider of neutral tools and infrastructure, highlighting that its liability is strictly limited to the technical operability of the stack. In its statement, the company notes that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act clears it of any wrongdoing. However, there is currently a bipartisan effort in Congress to revoke the law, which would force platforms to be accountable for content posted on or connected to their websites.

This development from Arizona also comes at a time when the chatbot Grok has been under heavy criticism by the global population. Governments across the country accused the platform of not keeping guardrails in place to check the activities of the chatbot, leading it to create AI-generated deepfakes of explicit images of women and children. While some countries have issued warnings to the platform, others have temporarily halted its access until work is done to correct the issue.

Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas – 30 days free access to our trading program

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/arizona-women-sue-over-ai-generated-deepfakes/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Zcash (ZEC) Price Prediction: ZEC Defends $300 Support as Bullish Structures and Privacy Narrative Return to Focus

Zcash (ZEC) Price Prediction: ZEC Defends $300 Support as Bullish Structures and Privacy Narrative Return to Focus

Zcash (ZEC) is holding above the crucial $300 support zone as price consolidates near $339, with traders watching key resistance levels and a potential bullish
Share
Brave New Coin2026/02/01 02:16
The 5000x Potential: BlockDAG Enters Its Final Hours at $0.0005 Before the Presale Ends

The 5000x Potential: BlockDAG Enters Its Final Hours at $0.0005 Before the Presale Ends

BlockDAG is one of the few projects offering a structured window rather than a surprise. The presale has already raised $452 million, and only hours remain to buy
Share
Techbullion2026/02/01 02:00
Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36