Silver moved fast, then pulled back just as quickly. That sudden liquidation caught attention because the price action felt out of sync with what was happening Silver moved fast, then pulled back just as quickly. That sudden liquidation caught attention because the price action felt out of sync with what was happening

Silver Liquidation Raised Eyebrows: Here’s What Actually Happened

Silver moved fast, then pulled back just as quickly. That sudden liquidation caught attention because the price action felt out of sync with what was happening underneath the surface. The move did not last long, yet it opened a window into how silver price discovery works when paper markets and physical demand briefly drift apart.

The liquidation did not appear out of nowhere. Silver had already posted a steep rally before the pullback arrived. That rally pushed price charts into near vertical territory, which often invites aggressive positioning and fast profit-taking. Once selling pressure entered the market, liquidation followed quickly and compressed the move into a short time window.

Bull Theory pointed to a temporary pricing gap that appeared during this period. Silver price on COMEX hovered near $92, while physical silver in Shanghai traded closer to $130. That gap did not persist for long, yet it highlighted how different venues respond to stress. The episode resolved as prices adjusted, which supports the view that this was a brief dislocation rather than a lasting condition.

Paper Silver Trading Played A Role In The Liquidation

Bull Theory explained that COMEX silver price action relies heavily on paper contracts. A large share of volume comes from claims rather than physical metal changing hands. Estimates often place the paper-to-physical ratio near 350 to 1. Under those conditions, heavy selling of contracts can pressure silver price even when physical supply remains tight.

This mechanism helps explain how liquidation can occur without visible strain in physical markets. Paper selling accelerates moves during volatile phases. Once that pressure eases, pricing tends to stabilize. The short duration of the silver price gap supports this interpretation.

Physical Silver Demand Remained Firm During The Move

Bull Theory also highlighted pricing from SMM and Shanghai, which track real transactions tied to physical delivery. Silver holding near $120 in those venues showed demand stayed present during the sell-off. Buyers continued paying premiums when availability mattered more than leverage.

This contrast mattered because it showed the liquidation did not stem from collapsing demand. The move reflected how different market structures react during sharp transitions. Physical pricing stayed resilient even as paper markets adjusted.

Silver’s Long-Term Structure Still Shapes Expectations

CrediBULL Crypto placed the move into a broader context. Silver recently broke out from a 44 year base, which marked a structural change. That breakout did not disappear because of a short liquidation. CrediBULL Crypto also noted that buying near vertical extensions carries risk, especially after a 400% advance over the past year.

Silver cycles move slower than crypto cycles. Corrections can stretch across 12 to 18 months without invalidating the larger pattern. Profit taking often appears once price enters discovery after decades of compression.

Read Also: XRP Short-Term Price Outlook: Reversal Not In Sight Yet

The liquidation raised eyebrows because it looked dramatic on the surface. Underneath, the episode clarified how paper-driven pricing can move faster than physical demand during sharp transitions. Bull Theory and CrediBULL Crypto both framed the move as part of a larger process rather than a breakdown.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel for daily crypto updates, market insights, and expert analysis.

The post Silver Liquidation Raised Eyebrows: Here’s What Actually Happened appeared first on CaptainAltcoin.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

OUSG (OUSG) - Complete Fundamental Analysis

OUSG (OUSG) - Complete Fundamental Analysis

OUSG (OUSG) Cryptocurrency Overview ## Core Technology and Blockchain Architecture OUSG is a tokenized short-term U.S. Treasury bills ETF managed by Ondo Finance

Share
Coinstats2026/02/01 09:01
Headwind Helps Best Wallet Token

Headwind Helps Best Wallet Token

The post Headwind Helps Best Wallet Token appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Google has announced the launch of a new open-source protocol called Agent Payments Protocol (AP2) in partnership with Coinbase, the Ethereum Foundation, and 60 other organizations. This allows AI agents to make payments on behalf of users using various methods such as real-time bank transfers, credit and debit cards, and, most importantly, stablecoins. Let’s explore in detail what this could mean for the broader cryptocurrency markets, and also highlight a presale crypto (Best Wallet Token) that could explode as a result of this development. Google’s Push for Stablecoins Agent Payments Protocol (AP2) uses digital contracts known as ‘Intent Mandates’ and ‘Verifiable Credentials’ to ensure that AI agents undertake only those payments authorized by the user. Mandates, by the way, are cryptographically signed, tamper-proof digital contracts that act as verifiable proof of a user’s instruction. For example, let’s say you instruct an AI agent to never spend more than $200 in a single transaction. This instruction is written into an Intent Mandate, which serves as a digital contract. Now, whenever the AI agent tries to make a payment, it must present this mandate as proof of authorization, which will then be verified via the AP2 protocol. Alongside this, Google has also launched the A2A x402 extension to accelerate support for the Web3 ecosystem. This production-ready solution enables agent-based crypto payments and will help reshape the growth of cryptocurrency integration within the AP2 protocol. Google’s inclusion of stablecoins in AP2 is a massive vote of confidence in dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies and a huge step toward making them a mainstream payment option. This widens stablecoin usage beyond trading and speculation, positioning them at the center of the consumption economy. The recent enactment of the GENIUS Act in the U.S. gives stablecoins more structure and legal support. Imagine paying for things like data crawls, per-task…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:27
RLUSD Attestation Strengthens Institutional Confidence as Liquidity Venues Expand

RLUSD Attestation Strengthens Institutional Confidence as Liquidity Venues Expand

The post RLUSD Attestation Strengthens Institutional Confidence as Liquidity Venues Expand appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. RLUSD is gaining momentum as independent
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/01 09:33