Pumpius (@pumpius), a well-known figure in the XRP community, recently drew attention to Lord Belgrave’s review of 2016 NDA drafts and briefing materials. ThesePumpius (@pumpius), a well-known figure in the XRP community, recently drew attention to Lord Belgrave’s review of 2016 NDA drafts and briefing materials. These

Explosive NDA Leak: XRP Flagged As the Only Ledger Built to Survive

2026/02/12 23:31
3 min read

Pumpius (@pumpius), a well-known figure in the XRP community, recently drew attention to Lord Belgrave’s review of 2016 NDA drafts and briefing materials. These documents revealed that the XRP Ledger was recognized as uniquely capable of surviving future technological challenges.

At the time, banks and government stakeholders were already analyzing how quantum computing could compromise traditional cryptography. XRP’s design was identified as distinct even in these early discussions.

Early Warnings from 2016

Lord Belgrave, a former City of London banker, reviewed NDA drafts and briefing materials from that period. He noted that public and private key systems, which secure most blockchains, were identified as vulnerable once quantum computing reached operational capability.

The documents outlined timelines, attack surfaces, and systemic risk, concluding that ledgers dependent solely on static secret keys would eventually face critical threats.

Belgrave explained that the XRP Ledger was treated differently. It was described as an adaptable system, capable of evolving beyond traditional key-based authority. The papers explored moving toward identity-based proofs, with human-linked credentials and verifiable identity forming the ledger’s control layer.

From Theory to Practice

At the time, many viewed these ideas as advanced and largely theoretical. Identity-based control was seen as conceptually elegant but premature. Today, the assessment has changed.

The XRP Ledger now supports advanced authorization models and identity frameworks. Ripple and emerging protocols are actively building systems that implement these concepts in practice. Belgrave reflected that what once appeared theoretical is now being engineered.

Advantages in Security and Resilience

The XRP Ledger’s architecture provides significant advantages for risk management. Systems that rely solely on static keys will face pressure as quantum computing matures.

By contrast, a ledger capable of transitioning to identity-based control can maintain security and operational integrity. Belgrave’s 2016 analysis shows that XRP was designed with this resilience in mind, giving it an edge over other networks.

Preparing for Future Challenges

Current developments confirm that the XRP Ledger is evolving as intended. Identity-anchored control and credential frameworks allow the network to adapt while preserving robust security. Ripple’s active role ensures the ledger can adopt new security protocols as technology advances, maintaining long-term viability.

Lord Belgrave’s insights illustrate a critical point. The XRP Ledger was engineered to survive challenges that will compromise other blockchains. As quantum computing becomes operationally relevant, XRP is positioned to remain secure and fully functional, confirming that it was built with future-proofing at its core.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.


Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post Explosive NDA Leak: XRP Flagged As the Only Ledger Built to Survive appeared first on Times Tabloid.

Market Opportunity
XRP Logo
XRP Price(XRP)
$1.362
$1.362$1.362
-1.03%
USD
XRP (XRP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.