Bulwark writer Catherine Rampell reports the administration of president Donald Trump is quietly building the kinds of watchlists that should make historians nervousBulwark writer Catherine Rampell reports the administration of president Donald Trump is quietly building the kinds of watchlists that should make historians nervous

'Do you feel safer?' 'Funny business' as Trump builds lists of dissidents and Jews

2026/01/23 11:24
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Bulwark writer Catherine Rampell reports the administration of president Donald Trump is quietly building the kinds of watchlists that should make historians nervous.

“There are lists of immigrants, lists of people with developmental disabilities, lists of dissidents — and lately, even lists of Jews,” said Rampell. “All ostensibly in the name of public safety.”

The administration recently sued the University of Pennsylvania to surrender a list of Jewish faculty, staff, and students, all without obtaining consent from Jewish community members themselves. The administration claims they require the Jewish registry to “combat antisemitism” on college campuses. But critics argue there’s no guarantee such a list wouldn’t fall into the wrong hands, particularly in this administration’s coalition with so many “Jew haters and Holocaust deniers,” Rampell claims. It’s certainly a bad idea in this political environment, where young white men are getting busted for trying to burn Jewish churches in Jackson, Mississippi.

“Against a backdrop of rising antisemitism, white supremacy, and other forms of hate, the danger that lists of Jews or other groups could fall into the wrong hands looms especially large,” according to a filing this week from groups affiliated with UPenn.

“The possibility that these data could be misused is not just a baseless, hypothetical concern: Again and again the Trump administration has been caught sharing data and breaching confidential records for purposes other than the stated reason for why those confidential records were collected in the first place,” said Rampell.

Just last year a whistleblower alleged that DOGE had unlawfully accessed private Social Security data and copied it into an unsecure cloud environment susceptible to manipulation and exposure.

“They’ve been sucking up data from all across government for immigration enforcement purposes, like basically anything that might have names, familial relationship, address, any geographic information,” said Bethanne Barnes, the former chief data officer for the Administration for Children and Families at Health and Human Services. “Just assume it’s all getting sucked in.”

“Barnes quit, she told me last week, in part due to some ‘funny business’ related to the government’s matching up of information on immigrant children with a national database of employment records,” Rampell said.

Meanwhile, Rampell reports the National Institutes of Health director echoed a certain unsettling historical figure when he announced that his agency will be creating a “disease registry” of people with autism — compiled without consent and against the wishes of members of the autism community.

Trump’s border czar Tom Homan, similarly, is threatening to create his own “database” of ICE protestors, which Rampell said sounds “an awful lot like twentieth-century government databases of Commies, wrongthinkers, and other political enemies. Or perhaps worse historical analogues, from Europe, also implemented in the name of keeping the public safe from the enemies within.”

“So I ask you, my fellow Americans,” concluded Rampell. “Do you feel safer yet?”

Read the Bulwark report at this link.

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52
Trump rages at 'independent' Supreme Court judges: 'I just want smart decisions'

Trump rages at 'independent' Supreme Court judges: 'I just want smart decisions'

President Donald Trump raged at "independent" Supreme Court judges on Monday during a bill signing ceremony in the Oval Office. Trump and several administration
Share
Rawstory2026/03/17 05:07
New Trump appointee Miran calls for half-point cut in only dissent as rest of Fed bands together

New Trump appointee Miran calls for half-point cut in only dissent as rest of Fed bands together

The post New Trump appointee Miran calls for half-point cut in only dissent as rest of Fed bands together appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stephen Miran, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers and US Federal Reserve governor nominee for US President Donald Trump, arrives for a Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee confirmation hearing in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, Sept. 4, 2025. The Senate Banking Committee’s examination of Stephen Miran’s appointment will provide the first extended look at how prominent Republican senators balance their long-standing support of an independent central bank against loyalty to their party leader. Photographer: Daniel Heuer/Bloomberg via Getty Images Daniel Heuer | Bloomberg | Getty Images Newly-confirmed Federal Reserve Governor Stephen Miran dissented from the central bank’s decision to lower the federal funds rate by a quarter percentage point on Wednesday, choosing instead to call for a half-point cut. Miran, who was confirmed by the Senate to the Fed Board of Governors on Monday, was the sole dissenter in the Federal Open Market Committee’s statement. Governors Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller, who had dissented at the Fed’s prior meeting in favor of a quarter-point move, were aligned with Fed Chair Jerome Powell and the others besides Miran this time. Miran was selected by Trump back in August to fill the seat that was vacated by former Governor Adriana Kugler after she suddenly announced her resignation without stating a reason for doing so. He has said that he will take an unpaid leave of absence as chair of the White House’s Council of Economic Advisors rather than fully resign from the position. Miran’s place on the board, which will last until Jan. 31, 2026 when Kugler’s term was due to end, has been viewed by critics as a threat from Trump to the Fed’s independence, as the president has nominated three of the seven members. Trump also said in August that he had fired Federal Reserve Board Governor…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:26