The post Truebit Protocol hack blamed on contract price calculation misconfiguration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The SlowMist blockchain security outfitThe post Truebit Protocol hack blamed on contract price calculation misconfiguration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The SlowMist blockchain security outfit

Truebit Protocol hack blamed on contract price calculation misconfiguration

The SlowMist blockchain security outfit shared its report of the audit on the hack that drained $26 million from the Truebit Protocol. 

According to the report, the root cause of the attack was that the addition operation in the numerator of the Purchase contract’s price calculation did not use the SafeMath library for overflow protection. 

How did the Truebit hack happen? 

SlowMist’s audit report revealed that Truebit’s contract was reportedly compiled with Solidity 0.6.10, and the native + operator does not include overflow checks. The attacker was able to wreak so much havoc by crafting a specific minting amount, which triggered the addition operation to exceed the maximum value of uint256 and wrap around. 

The function made the Price = 0, enabling near-zero-cost token minting and arbitrage, which the hacker quickly took advantage of to drain 8,535 ETH (~$26.44 million). The report ended with advice from the SlowMist team. 

“The SlowMist security team recommends that for contracts compiled with Solidity versions below 0.8.0, developers should ensure that all arithmetic operations are protected using the SafeMath library to prevent logic vulnerabilities caused by integer overflows,” it read. 

The Truebit team has acknowledged the hack, identifying the affected smart contract and advising the public to avoid interacting with it until further notice. 

“We are in contact with law enforcement and taking all available measures to address the situation. We will share updates through our official channels as they become available,” they claimed. 

One day later, the team claimed to be working hard to address the incident and that it had “engaged additional resources to strengthen tracing and recovery,” while promising updates through official channels.

In the comments section of the post, community members offered various next steps to the team, with a majority claiming the protocol had become unusable, that it was unlikely they would recover the funds, and needed to admit that. 

Commentators have noted that full recovery could be impossible. 

The $TRU token is still down 100% with zero percentage change and virtually no trading volume reported across major platforms since the hack, which reflects a complete lack of faith in the potential of the project to bounce back.

Truebit hack gave Uniswap brief boost 

Cryptopolitan reported on January 8 that Uniswap recorded over $1.4 million in daily trading fee capture revenue, the highest the platform has ever recorded since it was established. 

However, that record number came with a caveat. According to a Dune dashboard created by an analyst named Marcov, nearly $1.3 million of those fees came directly from trades related to Truebit’s TRU token. 

Marcov has now filtered out those values from the live dashboard because the token value has dropped to zero and won’t be claimed and used to burn UNI.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/truebit-protocol-hack-price-misconfiguration/

Market Opportunity
The Root Network Logo
The Root Network Price(ROOT)
$0.000201
$0.000201$0.000201
0.00%
USD
The Root Network (ROOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Vitalik Buterin Withdraws 16,384 ETH to Fund Open-Source Technology and Privacy Projects

Vitalik Buterin Withdraws 16,384 ETH to Fund Open-Source Technology and Privacy Projects

TLDR: Buterin withdrew 16,384 ETH to personally fund open-source projects as Ethereum Foundation reduces spending.  The initiative supports secure hardware, privacy
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/30 16:39
What is the most promising crypto right now? A practical checklist

What is the most promising crypto right now? A practical checklist

Crypto interest often spikes after headlines. This guide helps everyday readers turn curiosity into repeatable checks that limit obvious execution risks. We focus
Share
Coinstats2026/01/30 15:52
Inside Upexi’s SOL play: staking yield and locked token deals

Inside Upexi’s SOL play: staking yield and locked token deals

The post Inside Upexi’s SOL play: staking yield and locked token deals appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Upexi is the largest public company holding Solana tokens and uses a SOL strategy to build its holdings and generate additional revenue through staking. In an interview with crypto.news, Upexi CEO Allan Marshall explains why the company executed a large equity private placement to build a crypto treasury, citing MicroStrategy’s playbook and a more accommodating U.S. policy backdrop. Summary Upexi is the largest public holder of Solana, using equity raises to build a SOL treasury and earn staking yield. Upexi CEO Allan Marshall spoke with crypto.news in an interview. Corporate strategy focuses on accretive issuances, staking, and discounted locked SOL purchases, not venture investing. Upexi markets itself as a “new institutional gateway to Solana’s (SOL) speed, scale, and rapidly growing ecosystem.” But it isn’t alone, as it joins a handful of rival companies also building Solana treasuries, while dozens of other public entities are focusing on other coins. Speaking to crypto.news, Marshall discusses strategy and market perception. He notes that Upexi is focused on accretive capital raises, staking, and discounted, locked SOL purchases rather than venture investing. He also discusses how the company measures progress through an “adjusted SOL per share” metric designed to remove timing and leverage effects. We also discuss the company’s risk management strategies, which include a buy-and-hold approach, no hedging, disciplined use of leverage, and custody with qualified providers. The entire interview transcript is below: crypto.news: Upexi is now the largest corporate holder of Solana with over 2 million SOL in treasury. Why did you make such a dramatic shift now? Was there something specific that happened in the past few months that gave you the confidence to commit so heavily to a crypto treasury at this time? Allan Marshall: Upexi did the first large-scale equity private placement to create an altcoin treasury, and there were…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 02:51