PANews reported on January 30 that, according to SoSoValue data, Ethereum spot ETFs saw a total net outflow of $156 million yesterday (January 29, Eastern Time).PANews reported on January 30 that, according to SoSoValue data, Ethereum spot ETFs saw a total net outflow of $156 million yesterday (January 29, Eastern Time).
Ethereum spot ETFs saw a total net outflow of $156 million yesterday, with Fidelity's FETH ETF experiencing the largest net outflow at $59.1937 million.
News Brief
On January 29, Ethereum spot ETFs saw a collective net outflow of $156.00 million. Leading the withdrawals, Fidelity's FETH recorded departures totaling $59.19 million, yet the fund maintains impressive total net inflows of $2.67 billion. Following closely, BlackRock's ETHA experienced losses of $54.88 million while preserving cumulative inflows at $12.40 billion. Currently, analysts believe these ETFs collectively manage $16.75 billion in assets—roughly 4.95% of Ethereum's market capitalization. Overall, historical net inflows stand at $12.23 billion.
PANews reported on January 30 that, according to SoSoValue data, Ethereum spot ETFs saw a total net outflow of $156 million yesterday (January 29, Eastern Time).
The Ethereum spot ETF with the largest single-day net outflow yesterday was the Fidelity ETF FETH, with a single-day net outflow of $59.1937 million. Currently, FETH's total historical net inflow has reached $2.67 billion.
The second largest outflow was from the BlackRock ETF ETHA, which saw a net outflow of $54.8781 million in a single day. ETHA's total historical net inflow has reached $12.399 billion.
As of press time, the Ethereum spot ETF has a total net asset value of $16.75 billion, an ETF net asset ratio (market capitalization as a percentage of Ethereum's total market capitalization) of 4.95%, and a historical cumulative net inflow of $12.228 billion.
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
You May Also Like
The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For
The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush. Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs. Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
XRP Escrow Amendment Gains Momentum, Set for February 2026 Activation
TLDR The XRP Ledger’s Token Escrow amendment has gained 82.35% consensus and is set for activation on February 12, 2026. This amendment allows users to escrow a
Share
Coincentral2026/01/31 01:00
ZKP’s 300x Potential Takes Center Stage as XRP Price Shifts and Algorand News Turns Cautious
ZKP takes focus as XRP price tests a macro shift and Algorand news signals caution, reshaping views on structure and the best crypto to buy.
Share
Blockchainreporter2026/01/31 01:00