TLDR Polygon achieved an average Cost Per Wallet below $1 through a targeted marketing strategy. The study highlighted Polygon’s success in onboarding over 14 millionTLDR Polygon achieved an average Cost Per Wallet below $1 through a targeted marketing strategy. The study highlighted Polygon’s success in onboarding over 14 million

Polygon Achieves Wallet Acquisition Costs Below $1, New Study Reveals

TLDR

  • Polygon achieved an average Cost Per Wallet below $1 through a targeted marketing strategy.
  • The study highlighted Polygon’s success in onboarding over 14 million wallets via NFT campaigns.
  • Gaming and enterprise campaigns saw higher costs but remained efficient in acquiring wallets.
  • DeFi campaigns exhibited the highest wallet acquisition costs due to reward-heavy programs.
  • Addressable’s technology played a key role in Polygon’s wallet acquisition efficiency.

A new MBA case study by IVEY Publishing highlights Polygon’s cost-effective user acquisition strategy. It reveals that Polygon has achieved an average Cost Per Wallet (CPW) below $1. The study, developed in collaboration with Addressable, provides valuable insights into how blockchain growth can be measured similarly to traditional industries.

Polygon’s CPW Achievements Across Different Campaigns

The case study focuses on Polygon’s ability to optimize its marketing strategy, especially in acquiring wallets at low costs. According to the study, the company achieved the lowest costs through NFT campaigns. These campaigns onboarded over 14 million wallets at a CPW ranging from $0.2 to $0.5.

On the other hand, Polygon’s gaming and enterprise campaigns saw higher costs per wallet. Gaming campaigns acquired around 500,000 wallets with CPW reaching $12. Enterprise partnerships had a cost range between $5 to $10 per wallet. However, these efforts still remained highly efficient compared to other blockchain marketing campaigns.

DeFi Campaigns Exhibit Higher Costs

Polygon’s DeFi campaigns showed the highest CPW, reaching $50 to $100 per wallet. The costs in these campaigns were driven by reward-heavy liquidity programs. Despite the high CPW, Polygon’s approach to DeFi acquisition remained strategic, focusing on specific user behavior within these programs.

Retention rates for DeFi campaigns also declined after the termination of rewards and incentives. The study suggests that this factor significantly contributed to the higher wallet acquisition costs in DeFi. Polygon continues to explore ways to balance the reward structures with long-term user retention strategies.

The Study’s Relevance to Blockchain Growth Models

The case study presents a clear case for adopting new growth models within the blockchain space. Addressable’s Co-Founder, Asaf Nadler, stated that blockchain growth can now be quantified with the same rigor as traditional tech sectors. He added, “This study offers the clearest evidence yet that blockchain growth can be quantified with the same discipline expected in traditional tech and consumer industries.”

Polygon’s Chief Marketing Officer, Leon Stern, supported this view, emphasizing the importance of on-chain user behavior. “Effective growth comes from understanding real user behavior on-chain,” Stern said. He believes that CPW is emerging as the gold standard for blockchain marketing.

The post Polygon Achieves Wallet Acquisition Costs Below $1, New Study Reveals appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
DeFi Logo
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0.000518
$0.000518$0.000518
-2.07%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns

How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns

The post How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclaimer: This article is a sponsored
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 09:02
NGP Token Crashes 88% After $2M Oracle Hack

NGP Token Crashes 88% After $2M Oracle Hack

The post NGP Token Crashes 88% After $2M Oracle Hack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes The attacker stole ~$2 million worth of ETH from the New Gold Protocol on Sept.18. The exploit involved a flash loan that successfully manipulated the price oracle enabling the attacker to bypass security checks in the smart contract. The NGP token is down 88% as the attacker obfuscates their funds through Tornado Cash. New Gold Protocol, a DeFi staking project, lost around 443.8 Ethereum ETH $4 599 24h volatility: 2.2% Market cap: $555.19 B Vol. 24h: $42.83 B , valued at $2 million, in an exploit on Sept 18. The attack caused the project’s native NGP token to crash by 88%, wiping out most of its market value in less than an hour. The incident was flagged by multiple blockchain security firms, including PeckShield and Blockaid. Both firms confirmed the amount stolen and tracked the movement of the funds. Blockaid’s analysis identified the specific vulnerability that the attacker used. 🚨 Community Alert: Blockaid’s exploit detection system identified multiple malicious transactions targeting the NGP token on BSC. Roughly $2M has been drained. ↓ We’re monitoring in real time and will share updates below pic.twitter.com/efxXma0REQ — Blockaid (@blockaid_) September 17, 2025 Flash Loan Attack Manipulated Price Oracle According to the Blockaid report, the hack was a price oracle manipulation attack. The protocol’s smart contract had a critical flaw; it determined the NGP token’s price by looking at the asset reserves in a single Uniswap liquidity pool. This method is insecure because a single pool’s price can be easily manipulated. The attacker used a flash loan to borrow a large amount of assets. A flash loan consists of a series of transactions that borrow and return a loan within the same transaction. They used these assets to temporarily skew the reserves in the liquidity pool, tricking the protocol into thinking the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 19:04
Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT?

Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT?

The post Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Since it touched a high of $4.5, Lighter has
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 08:46