Former New York City Mayor Eric Adams has rejected allegations that his newly launched meme coin, NYC Token, was linked to suspicious liquidity withdrawals thatFormer New York City Mayor Eric Adams has rejected allegations that his newly launched meme coin, NYC Token, was linked to suspicious liquidity withdrawals that

Eric Adams Rejects “Rug Pull” Claims Tied to NYC Token Despite Big Losses

Former New York City Mayor Eric Adams has rejected allegations that his newly launched meme coin, NYC Token, was linked to suspicious liquidity withdrawals that left investors facing heavy losses.

Key Takeaways:

  • Eric Adams denies moving funds, blaming NYC Token losses on early market volatility.
  • The project admits to temporary liquidity rebalancing during the launch.
  • Onchain data flagged large withdrawals, sustaining rug pull concerns.

In a statement posted Tuesday to Adams’ X account, spokesperson Todd Shapiro said reports suggesting Adams moved money out of the NYC Token were “false and unsupported by any evidence.”

The statement added that Adams neither touched investor funds nor profited from the token’s launch, insisting that “no funds were removed from the NYC Token.”

NYC Token Team Blames Early Volatility for Post-Launch Price Drop

Shapiro characterized the token’s sharp price swings as a familiar feature of early-stage crypto projects.

“Like many newly launched digital assets, the NYC Token experienced market volatility,” he said, framing the turbulence as a market-driven event rather than a coordinated withdrawal.

The response followed heightened scrutiny of onchain activity surrounding NYC Token, which suffered a steep drawdown shortly after launch.

The project itself acknowledged liquidity adjustments, saying it had to “rebalance” amid strong demand.

In a post on X, the team said its partners temporarily removed funds for time-weighted average price execution and later added additional capital back into the liquidity pool.

Those explanations have done little to calm critics. Independent analysts flagged transactions that appeared to drain liquidity near peak prices, triggering concerns among traders.

One of the earliest warnings came from Rune Crypto, which alleged that roughly $3.4 million in liquidity was withdrawn shortly after launch and accused the project of operating like a rug pull.

Onchain visualization platform Bubblemaps also highlighted unusual patterns.

According to its analysis, a wallet connected to the token deployer removed around $2.5 million in USDC near the market top and later added back approximately $1.5 million after the token’s price had fallen more than 60%.

Bubblemaps: 60% of NYC Token Traders Lost Money After Launch

Bubblemaps further detailed the scope of trader losses. Of roughly 4,300 participants, an estimated 60% ended the token’s first hours in the red.

Most losses were under $1,000, but about 200 traders lost between $1,000 and $10,000. A smaller group suffered losses in the tens of thousands, while at least fifteen traders lost more than $100,000.

https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2011465515148218478?s=20

Adams’ camp has emphasized that the NYC Token was pitched as a vehicle to support nonprofit initiatives and community education, not as a speculative investment.

Still, the episode has fueled transparency concerns, particularly around governance and liquidity management.

The project’s website states that the token is deployed on Solana with a total supply of one billion tokens, 70% of which are allocated to a reserve excluded from circulating supply.

While the team has cited unnamed partners in its liquidity actions, it has yet to publish a detailed breakdown, leaving questions about oversight and accountability unresolved.

Market Opportunity
TokenFi Logo
TokenFi Price(TOKEN)
$0,004711
$0,004711$0,004711
-4,28%
USD
TokenFi (TOKEN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X, the most widely used app for crypto projects, is changing its API access policy. InfoFi projects, which proliferated non-organic bot content, will be cut off
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/01/16 02:50
X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

The post X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X has revoked API access for apps that reward users for
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 03:42
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37