According to a postmortem report, a math error in the Truebit Protocol purchase contract was responsible for the $26 million theft Hackers minted millions in tokensAccording to a postmortem report, a math error in the Truebit Protocol purchase contract was responsible for the $26 million theft Hackers minted millions in tokens

This Is What Really Happened In The $26M Truebit Hack

  • According to a postmortem report, a math error in the Truebit Protocol purchase contract was responsible for the $26 million theft
  • Hackers minted millions in tokens for nearly zero cost by bypassing overflow checks.
  • The TRU token price crashed by 100% following the $26 million drain.

The cryptocurrency space was hit hard on January 12, when the Truebit Protocol suffered a massive exploit that drained $26 million. 

This event caused the native TRU token to lose all its value almost instantly. Security experts from SlowMist analysed the situation and found that a small mistake in the code led to this financial disaster.

How a Simple Code Error Led to the Truebit hack

Every smart contract relies on precise math to work properly. 

In the case of Truebit, the contract used to buy tokens contained a small mistake. The developers wrote the contract using an older version of the Solidity programming language. 

Specifically, they used version 0.6.10, and this version does not automatically check for a problem called “integer overflow.”

How the attacker stole the funds How the attacker stole the funds | source: Slowmist

The attacker figured out a way to craft a specific minting amount. When the contract tried to add numbers together to calculate the price, the total became too large for the system to handle. 

Instead of stopping the transaction, the number wrapped around back to zero. This “silent overflow” meant that the price of millions of tokens suddenly became zero. The hacker exploited this loophole to mint 8,535 ETH worth of tokens at almost no cost. 

The Immediate Result of the Truebit Protocol Hack on the Market

Once the tokens were minted for free, the attacker quickly began draining the protocol’s reserves. 

The TRU token price fell by 99% within minutes of the discovery, and currently, the token shows a 100% loss on major tracking sites like CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko. Trading volume has vanished as investors lost all faith in the project.

The Truebit team acknowledged the incident through their official channels. 

They identified the affected contract and told users to stop interacting with it. They are now working with law enforcement to trace the stolen funds. However, many community members feel that a full recovery is unlikely. 

Unexpected Gains for Other Platforms

While Truebit suffered, other parts of the ecosystem saw even worse activity. Uniswap recorded a massive jump in its daily trading fee revenue on January 8. 

The platform captured over $1.4 million in fees in a single day, and this was the highest amount the platform had ever seen.

Analysts discovered that nearly $1.3 million of those fees came from trades related to the TRU token. The high volume was a direct result of the arbitrage and selling happening during the hack. 

An analyst named Marcov eventually removed these values from the live Dune dashboard. Since the token value hit zero, those fees will not be used to burn UNI as originally expected. 

The Move Toward Social Engineering and Phishing

While protocol hacks still happen, many criminals now seem to be changing their approach. They are moving away from complex code exploits to target human behaviour. 

Crypto phishing scams cost investors $722 million across 248 incidents last year. 

Fortunately, people are becoming more aware of these dangers. The total amount lost to phishing so far in 2025 was 38% lower than the $1 billion lost in 2024. 

This shows that education and better wallet security are starting to work. Even so, the Truebit Protocol hack proves that technical bugs are still a massive danger.

The post This Is What Really Happened In The $26M Truebit Hack appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
MATH Logo
MATH Price(MATH)
$0.03793
$0.03793$0.03793
-3.28%
USD
MATH (MATH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X, the most widely used app for crypto projects, is changing its API access policy. InfoFi projects, which proliferated non-organic bot content, will be cut off
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/01/16 02:50
X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

The post X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X has revoked API access for apps that reward users for
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 03:42
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37