Happiness is usually treated as a vague, ethereal concept that "just happens" If life is a system, then Happiness is the output. To fix it, I realized I needed Happiness is usually treated as a vague, ethereal concept that "just happens" If life is a system, then Happiness is the output. To fix it, I realized I needed

Happiness = Variables - Frictions: The Source Code

\

The Engineer’s Dilemma

Engineers, architects, and developers share a common flaw: we hate ambiguity. We build systems based on logic, predictable inputs, and measurable outputs. Yet, the most important metric of our existence—Happiness—is usually treated as a vague, ethereal concept that "just happens."

I don't like things that "just happen." I like things I can track, optimize, and debug.

If life is a system, then Happiness is the output. If the output is inconsistent, the code is buggy. To fix it, I realized I needed to stop treating happiness like magic and start treating it like math.

I developed a simple mental model called the Happiness Formula, and then I wrote a script to run it.

The Algorithm: H = ΣV - ΣF

The core philosophy is binary. There are things that charge your battery, and things that drain it.

  • H (Happiness): The net score of your current existence.
  • V (Variables): The drivers. These are consistent sources of joy (Family, coding, painting, coffee).
  • F (Frictions): The bugs. These are consistent sources of pain or resistance (Debt, anxiety, a bad commute, toxic relationships).

The formula is simple:

\ $$H = (V1 + V2 + V3…) - (F1 + F2 + F3…)$$

You rate every item on a scale of 0 to 100 based on intensity.

If you have a Variable like "Deep Work" that gives you immense satisfaction, it might be a 90. If you have a Friction like "Chronic Back Pain," that might be a -80.

Visualizing the Logic

The goal isn't just to "be happy." The goal is to maximize H.

\

\ When you visualize it this way, "getting happier" stops being an abstract wish and becomes an engineering ticket. You either need to push a feature update (add a new Variable) or patch a bug (remove a Friction).

The Build: A JavaScript H-Calculator

I didn't just want a theory; I wanted a tool. I whipped up a high-contrast, dark-mode calculator that allows me to input these values dynamically.

You can host this on GitHub Pages for free. The logic is lightweight. Here is the core function that drives the score:

function calculateHappiness() { // 1. Sum up the Variables (The Good) let vSum = 0; document.querySelectorAll('.v-score').forEach(input => { let val = parseFloat(input.value); if (!isNaN(val)) vSum += val; }); // 2. Sum up the Frictions (The Bad) let fSum = 0; document.querySelectorAll('.f-score').forEach(input => { let val = parseFloat(input.value); if (!isNaN(val)) fSum += val; }); // 3. The Formula let h = vSum - fSum; // 4. Render the Reality Check const resultArea = document.getElementById('result-area'); if (h > 0) { // Green: System is stable resultArea.style.borderColor = '#00ff00'; msg = "POSITIVE H. Your drivers outweigh your friction."; } else { // Red: System critical resultArea.style.borderColor = '#ff0000'; msg = "NEGATIVE H. Focus on minimizing your top frictions."; } }

Interpreting Your Data (My Score: 35)

I ran my own life through the calculator. I listed my drivers (creative work, family) and subtracted my frictions.

My H-Score came out to 35.

This is a positive integer, which means my system is stable. However, it’s not 100. This tells me that while my variables are strong, my frictions are likely creating too much drag.

If your score is Negative: You are in technical debt. No amount of "positive thinking" (adding small Variables) will fix a massive Friction score. You need to refactor. If your job causes you 90 points of friction, and your weekend hobby only brings 20 points of joy, the math will never work in your favor. You have to remove the friction.

If your score is Positive: You have a surplus. You can now afford to take risks, invest in new skills, or optimize your Variables to push that number higher.

Conclusion

We spend all day optimizing code, refactoring architectures, and cleaning up databases. Why do we accept spaghetti code in our personal lives?

Fork the repo. Run the numbers. Debug your life.

[https://github.com/damianwgriggs/The-Happiness-Formula]()

\ My Favorite Part: The Art

I made the header image today whilst thinking about this article and my formula. I wanted to have the canvas be yellow to represent happiness. The other colors, black, blue, (and some others I am unsure about) were selected to form a piece that conveys the messiness of happiness. Sometimes there are black spots, sometimes we are blue, but what matters most is that we are yellow (not cowardly lol) more than the splotches that can appear in our life. Below is the original image without the crop:

\ \ I would also encourage you to upload to socials and share your results. You can tag me @damianwgriggs!

Market Opportunity
Cyberlife Logo
Cyberlife Price(LIFE)
$0.0404
$0.0404$0.0404
-6.04%
USD
Cyberlife (LIFE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns

How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns

The post How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclaimer: This article is a sponsored
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 09:02
NGP Token Crashes 88% After $2M Oracle Hack

NGP Token Crashes 88% After $2M Oracle Hack

The post NGP Token Crashes 88% After $2M Oracle Hack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes The attacker stole ~$2 million worth of ETH from the New Gold Protocol on Sept.18. The exploit involved a flash loan that successfully manipulated the price oracle enabling the attacker to bypass security checks in the smart contract. The NGP token is down 88% as the attacker obfuscates their funds through Tornado Cash. New Gold Protocol, a DeFi staking project, lost around 443.8 Ethereum ETH $4 599 24h volatility: 2.2% Market cap: $555.19 B Vol. 24h: $42.83 B , valued at $2 million, in an exploit on Sept 18. The attack caused the project’s native NGP token to crash by 88%, wiping out most of its market value in less than an hour. The incident was flagged by multiple blockchain security firms, including PeckShield and Blockaid. Both firms confirmed the amount stolen and tracked the movement of the funds. Blockaid’s analysis identified the specific vulnerability that the attacker used. 🚨 Community Alert: Blockaid’s exploit detection system identified multiple malicious transactions targeting the NGP token on BSC. Roughly $2M has been drained. ↓ We’re monitoring in real time and will share updates below pic.twitter.com/efxXma0REQ — Blockaid (@blockaid_) September 17, 2025 Flash Loan Attack Manipulated Price Oracle According to the Blockaid report, the hack was a price oracle manipulation attack. The protocol’s smart contract had a critical flaw; it determined the NGP token’s price by looking at the asset reserves in a single Uniswap liquidity pool. This method is insecure because a single pool’s price can be easily manipulated. The attacker used a flash loan to borrow a large amount of assets. A flash loan consists of a series of transactions that borrow and return a loan within the same transaction. They used these assets to temporarily skew the reserves in the liquidity pool, tricking the protocol into thinking the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 19:04
Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT?

Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT?

The post Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Since it touched a high of $4.5, Lighter has
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 08:46