House Republicans are pushing to ban the Federal Reserve from creating a central bank digital currency (CBDC) by combining the anti-CBDC bill with the bipartisan crypto market structure bill. Related Reading: UK Crypto Groups Criticize Bank Of England’s Proposal To Cap Stablecoin Ownership – Report GOP Lawmakers Push For CBDC-CLARITY Merger GOP members in the […]House Republicans are pushing to ban the Federal Reserve from creating a central bank digital currency (CBDC) by combining the anti-CBDC bill with the bipartisan crypto market structure bill. Related Reading: UK Crypto Groups Criticize Bank Of England’s Proposal To Cap Stablecoin Ownership – Report GOP Lawmakers Push For CBDC-CLARITY Merger GOP members in the […]

US House Pushes To Combine Anti-CBDC And Crypto Market Structure Bills

2025/09/18 15:00

House Republicans are pushing to ban the Federal Reserve from creating a central bank digital currency (CBDC) by combining the anti-CBDC bill with the bipartisan crypto market structure bill.

GOP Lawmakers Push For CBDC-CLARITY Merger

GOP members in the US House of Representatives voted to retroactively combine H.R. 1919, also known as the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, with H.R. 3633, the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act of 2025.

According to a Politico report, the House was set to vote on Tuesday afternoon on a procedural vote that included a provision to combine the Anti-CBDC legislation with the CLARITY Act, both of which passed the US Congress’s lower chamber back in July.

The engrossment would include the CBDC text in the final version of the market structure bill sent to the Senate. “Provides that in the engrossment of H.R. 3633, the Clerk shall add the text of H.R. 1919, as passed by the House, as new matter at the end of H.R. 3633; conform the title of H.R. 3633 to reflect the addition of H.R. 1919, as passed by the House, to the engrossment,” the provision reads.

Notably, the anti-CBDC measure, sponsored by Majority Whip Tom Emmer, narrowly passed the House vote two months ago during the historic “Crypto Week,” which saw the passage of crucial crypto legislation, including the GENIUS Act.

At the time, GOP leaders pushed to combine the two bills after passing the vote to reconsider the bills, which initially failed to pass their procedural vote. However, Republican representatives on the Financial Services Committee opposed the measure, arguing that it could endanger the CLARITY Act’s bipartisan support.

House Agriculture Committee Republican representatives also considered that combining the two bills would have killed the CLARITY Act, arguing that it risked losing Democrats’ votes over the anti-CBDC language.

Ultimately, Republican leaders vowed to include the CBDC ban in Congress’s annual must-pass defense policy legislation and added the anti-CBDC language in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Politico noted that “few Democrats support the provision, meaning it is likely to get stripped out of the bill by the Senate.”

Senate To Advance Its Crypto Market Structure Bill

In a statement, a spokesperson for House Financial Services Chair French Hill said that “passing both the CLARITY Act and Anti-CBDC bill were key priorities for members of the House.” They added that “by combining both measures and sending them to the Senate, the House continues to advance both priorities.”

According to crypto journalist Eleanor Terret, the broad response among Capitol Hill sources was that the measure “really doesn’t change anything, as the Senate is working on its own bill which includes anti-CBDC language anyway.”

Notably, multiple US lawmakers, including Senator Cynthia Lummis, expect the bill to pass before the end of the month and reach President Donald Trump’s desk by year’s end. Some senators have raised concerns about the status of the upper chamber’s version of the bill, which has not been introduced yet, while House leaders have asked the Senate to pass the CLARITY Act.

“Republican and Democratic senators continue talks on the market structure legislation, which a group of leaders from several major crypto firms is set to meet tomorrow morning with Senate Banking Committee leadership in a roundtable, according to two industry invitees,” Terret reported on Tuesday night.

She noted that the meeting follows “more than a week of industry review of the committee’s latest approach to distinguishing securities from commodities, DeFi treatment, and other key issues.”

crypto, btc, btcusdt, bitcoin

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Senate Democrats’ DeFi gambit elicits outrage in crypto circles

Senate Democrats’ DeFi gambit elicits outrage in crypto circles

Senate Democrats’ opening gambit in negotiations over landmark crypto legislation has elicited a furious response from the crypto industry.The proposal would classify virtually every protocol in decentralised finance as a “digital asset intermediary” required to verify customer identities and adhere to anti-money laundering regulations.It would also require that websites offering access to DeFi protocols register as brokers and comply with a suite of new regulations, including customer protection standards, code audits, stress testing, disclosures regarding risk and protocol governance, and more. “This approach establishes a clear regulatory framework for decentralized financeplatforms by defining accountability, clarifying oversight, and preventing the misuse ofdecentralized protocols for illicit finance, sanctions evasion, or to bypass market guardrails,” according to a copy obtained by Politico. When it leaked earlier this week, it took the crypto industry by surprise, according to an industry source who has had conversations with legislative staff.“We had no idea that this was going to be the response,” said the source, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly about sensitive discussions. “They did not intend for this to be public.”Crypto attorneys and executives argue the policy was a nonstarter. Decentralised financial applications are designed to cut out middlemen, and forcing them to act as intermediaries is akin to a death sentence in many developers’ eyes. Moreover, anti-money laundering programs and customer screening cut against the crypto ideal of so-called permissionless finance, in which financial services are available to anyone with an internet connection — savers, traders, activists, dissidents, and criminals. “The disappointing proposal outlined by Senate Democrats would effectively ban decentralised finance, wallet development, and other applications in the United States,” Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger said in a statement. The Democrats’ proposal has little chance of becoming law. Crypto has found an ally in Republican lawmakers, who control both houses of Congress. President Donald Trump, a Republican, has launched several crypto companies over the past year. Nevertheless, it could derail talks to pass landmark crypto legislation, a priority for the president and congressional Republicans. Market structureIn July, the House of Representatives passed market structure legislation dubbed the Clarity Act, which would install the Commodity Futures Trading Commission as the crypto industry’s primary regulator. While the House bill drew significant bipartisan support, Senate Democrats have been leery.“It’s critical that any crypto regulation bill we pass does not have massive unintended consequences,” Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts, said in July. “Consequences that would reach far beyond the crypto market and take a tire iron to the $120 trillion golden egg that is America’s capital markets.”Senator Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina and the chair of the Banking Committee, initially set a September deadline for passing market structure legislation. While that deadline has come and gone, a dozen Democrats, many of them considered relatively crypto-friendly, signaled in September they were willing to negotiate when they published a six-page framework for the bill. “It is time to strengthen digital asset markets for investors and businesses through clear,consistent, and fair rules of the road,” they wrote. A new decentralisation test But that framework hardly touched on decentralised finance. This week’s proposal, on the other hand, deals squarely with DeFi. It grants the Treasury Department power to determine whether a protocol is “sufficiently decentralised.” A decentralised protocol would not be an intermediary — unless it features US-facing websites or someone receives “recurring revenues” from its use by third-parties. Those criteria would account for virtually every DeFi protocol today.The proposal also states that writing or publishing code is not a crime “absent deployment, control, or profit from the protocol.” It also allows the Treasury department to place protocols — or websites that offer access to DeFi protocols — on a “restricted list” if they are found to “facilitate” illicit finance or sanctions evasion. The department can also add protocols to the restricted list if they are found to pose a risk to “fair, orderly, and efficient markets, the stability of the U.S. financialsystem, or national security.” “Sadly, senate dems want to kill DeFi entirely — even the ones that call themselves pro crypto,” Uniswap founder Hayden Adams wrote on X.“No other conclusion if this is their policy stance.”According to the source, the proposal has varying levels of support among the 12 Democrats who signed September’s market structure framework. But it was largely led by Virginia Senator Mark Warner. “They have differing levels of saying they saw it, saying they actually read it, saying they didn’t really understand what was in it,” they said. “But Warner is leading. Warner has held the pen. He is the person who is pushing all this.”Warner and several other Democrats who signed the market structure framework did not immediately return DL News’ request for comment. The controversy appears to jeopardize the odds the Senate passes a market structure bill this year. Republicans have told Democrats they will not discuss the bill until the two sides schedule a vote, Politico reported Thursday. Scott did not immediately return DL News’ request for comment. The rift may also raise questions about the limits of crypto’s growing bipartisan clout. The industry spent an enormous amount of money in 2024 in an attempt to influence US congressional elections, according to watchdog group Public Citizen.It appears to have paid off. Market structure legislation passed the House with 71 Democrat votes in 2024; this year, it passed with 78. Crypto investor Nic Carter ruefully noted on X that crypto-aligned Super PACs had donated millions in the last election cycle to one of the Democrats leading market structure negotiations, Arizona Senator Reuben Gallego.But the industry hasn’t written Democrats off. “I don’t think this signals that no one’s gonna work with these Dems anymore,” the source said.“Everybody still wants to try to get to a productive place. … It’s just very disappointing that, even after all the advocacy we’ve already done, that this is what we get.”Aleks Gilbert is DL News’ New York-based DeFi correspondent. You can reach him at aleks@dlnews.com.
Share
Coinstats2025/10/12 02:00
Share