Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal questions his loyalty to Ethereum, citing lack of support from the Ethereum Foundation and community.Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal questions his loyalty to Ethereum, citing lack of support from the Ethereum Foundation and community.

Polygon CEO questions loyalty to Ethereum amid growing criticism of the Foundation

2025/10/21 17:05

Polygon Foundation CEO and founder Sandeep Nailwal is doubtful about his loyalty to Ethereum, the network he claims inspired him to start a career in blockchain. Nailwal made the remarks in a lengthy post on X late Monday, where he reflected on Ethereum Foundation’s treatment of Polygon, the Layer-2 scaling platform built atop it.

In his message, Nailwal said he had always viewed Ethereum as the foundation of his work in blockchain, but recent developments had forced him to reconsider his “moral loyalty” to the network. 

“I/we never got any direct support from the EF or the Ethereum CT community in fact, the reverse. But I have always felt moral loyalty towards Ethereum even if it costs me billions of dollars in Polygon’s valuation perhaps,” the Polygon CEO wrote.

Nailwal wrote his sentiments in support of Ethereum Geth core developer Péter Szilágyi, who had published a memo in May 2024 bashing the Ethereum Foundation’s leadership for “not appreciating developers enough to stick around.”

Polygon co-founder asks why Ethereum core developers are leaving?

Sandeep Nailwal believes the Ethereum community is dysfunctional because the foundation has supposedly been running “a shit show for quite some time.” He questioned why contributors are publicly expressing frustration with the project, although the network has brought in 16,000 new developers in the last 9 months, Cryptopolitan reported. 

“Why does it feel like every other week, someone with major contributions to Ethereum has to publicly question what they’re even doing here?” he asked. “Just go your own way already.”

The blockchain internet personality mentioned that he agreed with what Péter Szilágyi had written in his GitHub memo to EF last year. The Hungarian developer told his followers there was a “disconnect” between what the public had been saying and the behavior within the organization behind closed doors.

“I’ve often felt bad about Ethereum, about my role within the Geth team, at the Ethereum Foundation or even within the Ethereum ecosystem in general. This is not me resigning, at least not yet,” he jotted down.

Szilágyi insisted he had been openly discussing his frustrations with colleagues, including fellow developers Felix and Martin, but the conversations did as much as nothing. 

“I keep ending up back in the same original place over and over again,” he said, adding that he struggled to even “formulate what my problem is.”

Polygon boss says he's been 'questioning his loyalty' toward Ethereum, EF under scrutiny.Excerpt from Geth core developer Péter Szilágyi memo to EF. Source: GitHub.

One of Szilágyi’s pain points was about how EF handles compensation and recognition for its contributors. He said that while the Foundation publicly calls him a leader in the ecosystem, its internal actions do not reflect that status.

“Almost all the initial employees of the Foundation have left long ago as that was the only reasonable way to actually have a compensation proportional to the value being created,” Szilágyi propounded.

He accused the Foundation of taking advantage of developers’ commitment because it “overly abused the fact that some people were in this for principles, not for the money,” further citing Vitalik Buterin’s quote that “if someone’s not complaining that they are paid too little, then they are paid too much.”

Polygon still in the shadows of Ethereum

Nailwal also used his post to address Polygon’s decision to stick in line with Ethereum, but admitted the direction may have come at a financial cost. He estimated that if Polygon were to brand itself as a standalone Layer-1 network, it could be valued “two to five times higher” than it is today.

“Like think about it, Hedera Hashgraph, an L1, is valued higher than Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism and Scroll combined,” he reckoned.

He added that the Ethereum community undermines Polygon’s position, neither recognizing it as a true Layer-2 nor including it in the “Ethereum beta.” 

“They don’t seem to understand that Polygon PoS effectively hinged on Ethereum, while Katana, XLayer, and dozens of other chains in Polygon’s ecosystem are true L2s…When Polymarket wins big, it’s ‘Ethereum,’ but Polygon itself is not Ethereum. Mind-boggling,” Nailwal complained. 

Yearn Finance founder Andre Cronje also supported Nailwal’s and Szilágyi’s outcry of having zero support from EF. 

“So who is EF paying/supporting? While building on ETH I have burned over 700 ETH on deployments and ETH infra. I tried contacting EF, never a response, no BD outreach, no grants, 0 support, not even a retweet,” he continued, “If it isn’t the core builders, Peter & Geth, and it isn’t the loudest L2 supporters, Sandeep and Polygon, where is it going?”

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Fed Considers Active Role in Crypto Payments, Explores Master Account Model for Stablecoins

Fed Considers Active Role in Crypto Payments, Explores Master Account Model for Stablecoins

The post Fed Considers Active Role in Crypto Payments, Explores Master Account Model for Stablecoins appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 💹 Trade with pro tools Fast execution, robust charts, clean risk controls. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🚀 Smooth orders, clear control Advanced order types and market depth in one view. 👉 Create account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 📈 Clarity in volatile markets Plan entries & exits, manage positions with discipline. 👉 Sign up → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ⚡ Speed, depth, reliability Execute confidently when timing matters. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🧭 A focused workflow for traders Alerts, watchlists, and a repeatable process. 👉 Get started → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ✅ Data‑driven decisions Focus on process—not noise. 👉 Sign up → The Fed is pursuing an active role in shaping a crypto-enabled payments ecosystem, exploring a “payment account” model to connect firms to federal rails while modernizing infrastructure and policy. This positions the central bank at the center of a broader, ongoing payments revolution involving stablecoins, tokenized assets, and AI-driven transactions. Interoperable, modern payment rails are a priority: the Fed seeks to bridge traditional banking with crypto through a hybrid model that accommodates stablecoins and tokenized deposits. Regulators are pushing for real-time, 24/7 settlement, clearer crypto standards, and robust fraud detection to support crypto-linked deposits while maintaining financial stability. Discussion centers on a possible “payment account” or “skinny” master account granting eligible firms access to Fed settlement feeds to accelerate crypto integration. The Fed’s roadmap emphasizes secure, scalable rails and policy clarity for crypto, with interoperability and risk controls at the forefront—an evolving framework designed to keep pace with innovation in payments. What is the Fed’s approach to integrating crypto into U.S. payments? The Fed is pursuing an active role in crypto-enabled payments, exploring a “payment account” model to connect…
Share
2025/10/22 01:38
Share