In a recent development, Sam Bankman-Fried, co-founder of the defunct crypto exchange, FTX, which collapsed in 2022. has challenged the court’s decision in his case. According to Bloomberg, his lawyers filed an appeal on Tuesday, claiming he was apprehended and judged in a rush. For context, FTX was once a leading crypto exchange that went bankrupt in November 2022 due to allegations that its owners had embezzled and misused customer funds. Following the collapse, investigation, and court sittings, the authorities sentenced Bankman-Fried to 25 years in prison alongside other executives who received lesser punishments. He was also required to repay investors’ funds that were lost due to the crash. Bankman-Fried Files Appeal Bankman-Fried’s lawyers noted that due to the heat of the event, everyone, including the press, prosecutors, and legal authorities, was out to get him after the platform’s collapse. Hence, they are now pushing towards reversing his conviction and 25-year prison sentence.  “Sam Bankman-Fried was never presumed innocent. He was presumed guilty — before he was even charged,” they said.  Meanwhile, a Manhattan panel found SBF guilty of seven criminal counts, including fraud and conspiracy, at FTX. Additionally, a few other influential members of the crypto industry contributed to the investigation, identifying Bankman-Fried as the brain behind the company’s funds mismanagement. Moreover, there were three witnesses against Bankman-Fried, including FTX’s former engineering chief, Nishad Singh, Gary Wang, his co-founder, and Caroline Ellison, Bankman-Fried’s girlfriend. They also pleaded guilty and got minimal prison sentences when compared to SBF’s 25-year conviction. Bankman-Fried Wants Another Judge Currently representing Bankman-Fried in the case is Alexandra Shapiro, a top criminal appeals lawyer. Just this year, Shapiro has excelled in a case involving three executives apprehended for white-collar crimes and holds other success stories.  As part of the appeal, SBF’s lawyers want the case to be handled by another judge, stating that the eighty-year-old Judge Lewis Kaplan, who sat on the case earlier, has “repeatedly put a thumb on the scale to help the government and thwart the defense.” The team also argued that at one point, Judge Kaplan pressured members of the jury into a quick verdict, offering them free dinner and car service to stay late on the first day of the case examination. They added that Kaplan “continually ridiculed Bankman-Fried, criticized his demeanor, and signaled his disbelief of Bankman-Fried’s testimony.” The post FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried Challenges 25-Year Fraud Sentence in Appeal appeared first on CoinTab News.In a recent development, Sam Bankman-Fried, co-founder of the defunct crypto exchange, FTX, which collapsed in 2022. has challenged the court’s decision in his case. According to Bloomberg, his lawyers filed an appeal on Tuesday, claiming he was apprehended and judged in a rush. For context, FTX was once a leading crypto exchange that went bankrupt in November 2022 due to allegations that its owners had embezzled and misused customer funds. Following the collapse, investigation, and court sittings, the authorities sentenced Bankman-Fried to 25 years in prison alongside other executives who received lesser punishments. He was also required to repay investors’ funds that were lost due to the crash. Bankman-Fried Files Appeal Bankman-Fried’s lawyers noted that due to the heat of the event, everyone, including the press, prosecutors, and legal authorities, was out to get him after the platform’s collapse. Hence, they are now pushing towards reversing his conviction and 25-year prison sentence.  “Sam Bankman-Fried was never presumed innocent. He was presumed guilty — before he was even charged,” they said.  Meanwhile, a Manhattan panel found SBF guilty of seven criminal counts, including fraud and conspiracy, at FTX. Additionally, a few other influential members of the crypto industry contributed to the investigation, identifying Bankman-Fried as the brain behind the company’s funds mismanagement. Moreover, there were three witnesses against Bankman-Fried, including FTX’s former engineering chief, Nishad Singh, Gary Wang, his co-founder, and Caroline Ellison, Bankman-Fried’s girlfriend. They also pleaded guilty and got minimal prison sentences when compared to SBF’s 25-year conviction. Bankman-Fried Wants Another Judge Currently representing Bankman-Fried in the case is Alexandra Shapiro, a top criminal appeals lawyer. Just this year, Shapiro has excelled in a case involving three executives apprehended for white-collar crimes and holds other success stories.  As part of the appeal, SBF’s lawyers want the case to be handled by another judge, stating that the eighty-year-old Judge Lewis Kaplan, who sat on the case earlier, has “repeatedly put a thumb on the scale to help the government and thwart the defense.” The team also argued that at one point, Judge Kaplan pressured members of the jury into a quick verdict, offering them free dinner and car service to stay late on the first day of the case examination. They added that Kaplan “continually ridiculed Bankman-Fried, criticized his demeanor, and signaled his disbelief of Bankman-Fried’s testimony.” The post FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried Challenges 25-Year Fraud Sentence in Appeal appeared first on CoinTab News.

FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried Challenges 25-Year Fraud Sentence in Appeal

2025/11/05 01:15

In a recent development, Sam Bankman-Fried, co-founder of the defunct crypto exchange, FTX, which collapsed in 2022. has challenged the court’s decision in his case. According to Bloomberg, his lawyers filed an appeal on Tuesday, claiming he was apprehended and judged in a rush.

For context, FTX was once a leading crypto exchange that went bankrupt in November 2022 due to allegations that its owners had embezzled and misused customer funds. Following the collapse, investigation, and court sittings, the authorities sentenced Bankman-Fried to 25 years in prison alongside other executives who received lesser punishments. He was also required to repay investors’ funds that were lost due to the crash.

Bankman-Fried Files Appeal

Bankman-Fried’s lawyers noted that due to the heat of the event, everyone, including the press, prosecutors, and legal authorities, was out to get him after the platform’s collapse. Hence, they are now pushing towards reversing his conviction and 25-year prison sentence. 

Meanwhile, a Manhattan panel found SBF guilty of seven criminal counts, including fraud and conspiracy, at FTX. Additionally, a few other influential members of the crypto industry contributed to the investigation, identifying Bankman-Fried as the brain behind the company’s funds mismanagement.

Moreover, there were three witnesses against Bankman-Fried, including FTX’s former engineering chief, Nishad Singh, Gary Wang, his co-founder, and Caroline Ellison, Bankman-Fried’s girlfriend. They also pleaded guilty and got minimal prison sentences when compared to SBF’s 25-year conviction.

Bankman-Fried Wants Another Judge

Currently representing Bankman-Fried in the case is Alexandra Shapiro, a top criminal appeals lawyer. Just this year, Shapiro has excelled in a case involving three executives apprehended for white-collar crimes and holds other success stories. 

As part of the appeal, SBF’s lawyers want the case to be handled by another judge, stating that the eighty-year-old Judge Lewis Kaplan, who sat on the case earlier, has “repeatedly put a thumb on the scale to help the government and thwart the defense.”

The team also argued that at one point, Judge Kaplan pressured members of the jury into a quick verdict, offering them free dinner and car service to stay late on the first day of the case examination. They added that Kaplan “continually ridiculed Bankman-Fried, criticized his demeanor, and signaled his disbelief of Bankman-Fried’s testimony.”

The post FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried Challenges 25-Year Fraud Sentence in Appeal appeared first on CoinTab News.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

The post Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. American-based rock band Foreigner performs onstage at the Rosemont Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, November 8, 1981. Pictured are, from left, Mick Jones, on guitar, and vocalist Lou Gramm. (Photo by Paul Natkin/Getty Images) Getty Images Singer Lou Gramm has a vivid memory of recording the ballad “Waiting for a Girl Like You” at New York City’s Electric Lady Studio for his band Foreigner more than 40 years ago. Gramm was adding his vocals for the track in the control room on the other side of the glass when he noticed a beautiful woman walking through the door. “She sits on the sofa in front of the board,” he says. “She looked at me while I was singing. And every now and then, she had a little smile on her face. I’m not sure what that was, but it was driving me crazy. “And at the end of the song, when I’m singing the ad-libs and stuff like that, she gets up,” he continues. “She gives me a little smile and walks out of the room. And when the song ended, I would look up every now and then to see where Mick [Jones] and Mutt [Lange] were, and they were pushing buttons and turning knobs. They were not aware that she was even in the room. So when the song ended, I said, ‘Guys, who was that woman who walked in? She was beautiful.’ And they looked at each other, and they went, ‘What are you talking about? We didn’t see anything.’ But you know what? I think they put her up to it. Doesn’t that sound more like them?” “Waiting for a Girl Like You” became a massive hit in 1981 for Foreigner off their album 4, which peaked at number one on the Billboard chart for 10 weeks and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:26
Hyperliquid’s Buyback Delivers Profit as Other Crypto Tokens Face Losses

Hyperliquid’s Buyback Delivers Profit as Other Crypto Tokens Face Losses

The post Hyperliquid’s Buyback Delivers Profit as Other Crypto Tokens Face Losses appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 💹 Trade with pro tools Fast execution, robust charts, clean risk controls. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🚀 Smooth orders, clear control Advanced order types and market depth in one view. 👉 Create account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 📈 Clarity in volatile markets Plan entries & exits, manage positions with discipline. 👉 Sign up → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ⚡ Speed, depth, reliability Execute confidently when timing matters. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🧭 A focused workflow for traders Alerts, watchlists, and a repeatable process. 👉 Get started → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ✅ Data‑driven decisions Focus on process—not noise. 👉 Sign up → Hyperliquid’s token buyback succeeded with a 65% profit after spending $780 million on 34.41 million HYPE tokens, thanks to its revenue-generating perpetuals DEX model. In contrast, six other crypto projects lost $98 million on $321 million in buybacks due to weak fundamentals and artificial demand. Hyperliquid’s success: Generated $508.55 million profit from real utility in trading fees and platform benefits. Failed projects like Bonk and LayerZero saw losses of 57% and 31.5% respectively, highlighting buybacks’ inability to create value without strong revenue. Combined, seven projects spent $1.1 billion; only Hyperliquid profited, while others faced $98 million in losses with no underlying token utility. Discover how Hyperliquid’s buyback yielded 65% gains in crypto token buybacks, while others failed. Explore strategies for successful tokenomics in 2025. What Made Hyperliquid’s Buyback a Success in Crypto Token Buybacks? Hyperliquid’s buyback stands out as a rare win in the volatile world of crypto token buybacks, where the project spent $780 million to repurchase 34.41 million HYPE tokens, now valued at $1.28 billion for a 65.16% profit margin. This achievement stems from Hyperliquid’s robust model…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/05 04:10